Linden16Mclean1fan

Members
  • Content count

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

43 Neutral

About Linden16Mclean1fan

  • Rank
    K-Wing Regular

Contact Methods

  • ICQ 157537700

Profile Information

  • Location Surrey
  • Interests HOCKEYHOCKEY
  1. Michael Gillis is grossly overrated

    That's how it works in the business. If you're the guy who comes in to re-build a team, more often or not you won't get to reap the success for the foundation that you built. You are usually fired before it happens. It's the next guy that gets the credit because he is also the next guy that makes that move that puts you over the top. That's what Gillis did. He could have easily blow this team after it failed to make the playoffs 2 out of 3 years. It looked like the window of this core of players has closed. The GM can always ask to do that to make "his own team". Moves that he didn't make might as well be considered the moves that he did. He re-signed the twins, kept Kesler, Burrows, Salo, Bieksa, found a way to keep his star (at the time) long-term. He kept them instead of moving them. Credit to him for that. He was able to fit every piece of the puzzle together. If they didn't fit, he found a piece that did. That's what a good GM does. I don't understand how someone can find fault with that. Sacrificing the future? You know what he was brought in to do? Make this team a winner now and that's what he has done. Again, he could have blown up the team and got more draft picks and younger players. You know why he can't because the owners and fans don't allow it. Canuck fans don't want to win another 5-6 years for prospects to round out. We've already been doing that with the Sedins, Keslers, Burrows, Bieksa, etc. It's their time now, the only way to see the fruits of our patience is to stick with these guys and find the extra pieces that put the team over the top and that's exactly what Gillis has been doing.
  2. Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?

    Let's break this down (maybe again??):
  3. Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?

    You know he won't be around on Monday when they announce the 3 stars for the month. 15 goals (including 2 shorties, hat tricks and a minimum 3 multiple goal games)in January should secure him the first star. Still haven't looked at his plus/minus for the month. Damn it, I don't want that guy on my TEAM!! This thread should be a lesson for all those idiots who like to play gypsy look into their "magic crystal ball" and make bold statements. The guy has got the single most unpopular post in the history of CDC. Goodnight, Clutch. Too bad you don't have an eye for talent.
  4. Burrows v. Auger: Case Closed?

    This has nothing to do with the topic but does Auger look like Mr. Bean/Rowan Atkinson in that picture or what?
  5. Burrows? Do We Really Need Him?

    Anyone ripping Burrows or accusing the Canucks of try to replace Daniel with Burrows is an idiot anyways. Why bother listening to him/her? No one in his right mind thinks Burrs is a superstar first liner. Not even Burrs, look at the contract he just signed. Bottomline though, he works well with the twins and he's the 2nd most successful player to play on that line. The twins may not need him but he sure does mean more than 20 goals for the Canucks.