[Proposal] (Trade) better now and in the future. Van trades to help add leadership and grit in Proposals and Armchair GM'ing Posted January 14 On 1/11/2020 at 1:44 PM, RowdyCanuck said: Well problem with that is ristlo and Myers play the same style and need a more stay a home d partner like elder. Hughes is the future and we need a mean right handed D man to play with Hughes , like I said in theory that's almost perfect pairing , balance wise. Also Weber is good cause his cost controlled and the way he plays when his cap hit becomes a problem he will problem go on Ltir. Why against trading Brock ? I would say Forsberg is an up grade( forsberg can skate) also Forsberg is cost controlled too. buffalo is closer to minnie isn't it? I disagree that Forsberg is better than Brock. Brock now, arguable has a more complete game and has 43 points in 46 games. Also, don't think Forsberg is all that much "cost controlled". He has a cap hit of 6 mill for two more seasons. Not much of a difference between the two when talking about contracts. I don't understand the need/desire to trade Boeser. He has 43 points in 46 games. He has chemistry with Miller, Petterson, and Horvat allowing him to move between the top lines. We don't really have an over abundance of PPG wingers on this team. Some of you are putting way too much stock in to Hoglander and Podkolzin. The only thing I would trade Boeser for is a young top pairing dman, otherwise Im keeping him for the long haul. Also HELL NO to trading Pearson. He is on pace for 60 points, plays well with Horvat, has the ability to play physical and has a caphit of 3.75 for one more year. Keep BOESER Keep PEARSON Keep VIRTANEN If you want to move someone move Sutter, Baertschi, Goldobin, Leivo, MacEwan, etc.