How swede it is

It's not that bad. All they need is a 40% PP to negate the 60%PK.

Actually, it's hold...hold...hold....pass...hold...hold...hold....pass....hold....hold...hold..pass.....retrieve puck from own end and start over....

Isn't he the guy that injured 2 of our players a while back, or am I thinking of some other big body forward?

Nope...not yet...we can still tie Mtl. and we would have the first tie breaker.

Me too.

Met Trevor when he was an 18 yr rookie. Here he is holding my daughter. Great guy, easy to talk to.

Wife and I got ours last week. Woke up with fever and aches, but they went away by the end of the day.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Wearing (insert 1 of 29 players) old number 15.

Perhaps the fact that he was down on the ice earlier and recovered quite quickly after the whistle had something to do with the non stoppage. On another note, regarding the penalty on Roussel when the Hab's player fell. All games are watched back in the NHL offices, and they call when a goal is scored that the ref's don't see. So why can't they call in instances like that when it was clearly not a penalty.

He also sounds a lot like Greg Millan, who I couldn't stand.

They will still have 4 games in hand. But if we win both, they will be trying to catch us.

The Maple Leafs say hi!!

He Butt-ended him....just as bad

I give every player the same consideration. If a player has potential and the tools to do the job. But only plays to that potential when he feels like it, that irritates me. I don't care if a player fails, but at least give 100%. Let's just hope he's a slow learner, and is finally learning what it take to be successful every game.

Only 3 teams can win on a given night (barring 3pt games). So as long as we win some games, we will pick up points on some. There is always hope, until we are mathematically eliminated.

He's got the tools, but just like me he can't seem to find the one he needs when he needs it.

Current Injuries: Jacob Markstrom: 1 game - upper body (Feb. 22) I think it must be a sunburned neck from the red light being on for so long.

Definitely in the top 30. Not elite yet, a ways to go before that happens.

It's not just about the seating arrangement. It's also about everything else, concession, washrooms, entering, exiting. Crowds will form. Not saying it's a totally bad idea, just that no one thinks of the other stuff that goes on at games. I'd love to get back to going to games. Just wouldn't want to be there with that one person that infects everyone else, and so on and so on.

And to have only 18 pts.... that's amazing

I'm dissapointed that they lost, but not mad. Sometimes the better team wins. 17 games in 34 days including 4 back to backs. Vegas 15 games in 33 days, only 2 back to backs. The future is bright.

Agreed...most teams go with 1 guy during the playoff run. Unless, like you said, something happens to that guy.

Totally agree. How hard can it be to schedule 1 game a day in each arena. Not like any thing else is being scheduled.

I'm in total agreement with you on Vegas. Whenever somebody says they were an expansion team I get a bit upset. How many expansions teams (after going to 12 teams) made it to the Stanley Cup their first year? NONE! Okay, the Blues did their first 3 years. But that was when all expansions teams were in the same division. Their worst showing since inception is last year or perhaps this year. But come on they were not an "expansion team" in the true sense of the word. 1st yr team sure. New team sure. The worst part is, they won't lose a player to Seattle. If Seattle benefits from the draft like Vegas did, I can see a Seattle - Vegas Conference final sooner than later.

The other difference was Horvat was on our side of the red line!!!