Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Orcasfan

Members
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

1,597 profile views

Orcasfan's Achievements

Junior Prospect

Junior Prospect (1/14)

128

Reputation

  1. Saying that OJ went through the same surgical procedure (micro discectomy) as Edler does not mean that they had exactly the same injury! A micro discectomy is essentially a laproscopic procedure where they go in and shave a disc that is protruding. There can be a huge difference, case to case, depending (as always) on the severity of the injury ( how much protrusion, any tearing,etc). From the brief description, it could totally be caused by improper weight training (very common!). There is no reason to think that he won't be healed within 4-6 weeks. However, if he were my patient, I would suggest that he continue to be careful in how much he challenges his low back in training for a further few weeks.. He's a young athlete...with all that fabulous growth hormone still flooding his system! He'll be fine. Btw, I think Edler had been carrying his low back injury for a while before he had the surgery. So, without knowing any of his medical details, that could point to a developing chronic situation, perhaps causing more damage.
  2. It seems that the narrative describing OJ's development as "disappointing", is based on false assumptions (otherwise known as "fake news"). These anxious and disappointed people stress the "fact" that players drafted after him are doing very well. Check it out. In fact, there are only 3 players, from the first round, who were chosen after OJ who have done anything noteworthy at all....Tkachuk, Sergachev and McAvoy. That's it, folks! All the others are either wallowing away in Juniors, or are struggling in the AHL. Most of them still in Juniors. It looks like the 2016 draft, outside of the top 10, may have been one of the weaker ones in recent history. Though, really, it is too early to tell. The reality of the Draft is that every year you are going to see this kind of situation play out, even, sometimes benefitting the Canucks. Given how successful Boeser has been in his rookie year, does it mean that all the players chosen before him in the 2015 draft, who haven't done so well, are busts?
  3. First off, they are both still valuable players. I do agree that, as a centre, Henrik has been showing his age/wear more than Daniel. One option would be to play Henrik on the wing (a playmaking winger!). Has this ever been tried before? How about a 3rd line next year of the twins, plus Sutter in the centre?
  4. I agree...a very promising pick by JB. I could care less about his so-called PCS, but, obviously, our European scouts had tabbed him for Benning to have a close look at in those international tournaments. By the way, I think he dropped so much because of his relatively poor showing at the U18's. Goes to show that NHL teams tend to place too much emphasis on that one tournament.
  5. Yeah, I'm disappointed that Canucks Army has gone so far in their love affair with stats analysis. They seem to be using their new PCS ratings as the be-all and end-all when it comes to how they rate these draft prospects. Using their model, there is no apparent need for any skilled scouting! There are just so many flaws in the usefulness of this type of analysis, that it becomes more of a distraction, rather than an aid. I know this is difficult for those would-be sports journos over at CA to hear - but there is no real substitute for the eyes of a good scout!
  6. Great pick! Definitely seemed like his skill-set is just what this team needs...more skilled scorers! And with size and determination! He was undoubtedly the BPA at 23. I would have liked to add Jeremy Roy too, but not at 23. For some of you who are concerned about the college commitment...remember there have been some great players who have gone the NCAA route - Toews, Parise, Schneider, etc. It doesn't always mean that they stay the full 4 years. And most (even those from Minnesota) fulfill their draft commitment with the team that drafted them. In this case, I would imagine the kid will leave ND after a couple of years. I am not overly impressed with Konecny, unlike some others. I have no doubts that Boeser will turn out to be the more impressive prospect.
  7. I wouldn't be so sure of "Benning's vision", just yet. For one thing, when he and Linden make a general reference to the characteristics they want to improve the team with, they are not necessarily referring to the player they choose at #6, but more likely they are speaking about their overall drafting direction. So, I think we will get a very good prospect at #6...and I don't know who that will be! However, I think that they will look to fill a particular need with this pick...a player that could slot into the team within a couple of years. If the pick was later in the draft (say 15-30), then, I imagine they would go with the conventional BPA, because there is no telling just how that pick would develop over a few years. But, even with this draft, a pick at #6 has a very good chance of becoming an impact player. Personally, I think they will choose a C or a LW - yes, that translates as most likely, Ritchie, Nylander, Draisaitl or Ehlers. Of course, it would also include Dal Cole, Reinhart or Bennett, if any of them fell to #6 (unlikely). Actually, I am starting to appreciate Ritchie more lately, but I have a feeling that the Islanders will pick him up to play on the left side of Tavares. We'll see in a month!
  8. This could be the last chance for several years (at least) for this team to draft at this level. Benning and Linden have said that they want the player they pick at #6 to be the "cornerstone" of the team for years to come. Obviously, whoever is chosen will be skilled, talented, etc. (unless they really mess up!). So, the question is ...if you were going to build your future team, which position would you fill first? Of course, you need to take into consideration the players available in this draft. In my book you look for that sure-fire #1 D, or your next 1st line C. And, looking at the current Canucks and the up-coming prospects, that is exactly the approach to use.(How many times have the Canucks tried to acquire that guy through trades? No team is going to trade away that guy! ) Now, the only D prospective draftee who could perhaps fill that #1 D position is Ekblad. I think he will be taken by Edmonton, Calgary or Florida. It is unlikely he will be still available at #6. So, let's look at the centres available. Obviously, Reinhart tops the list, but, without an amazing trade, will not be around at #6. That leaves Draisaitl and Nylander (both of whom play C and wing). If either of those guys are still available for our pick, I think that's who Linden/Benning will go for. They both have the definite potential to be your #1 C for years to come. They bring some different tools to the table, so, the Combine will probably be the determining factor (especially the interviews). Henrik has been the best Canuck ever. Certainly has been the "cornerstone" of this team for the past 7-8 years. We need to get his potential replacement on the team in the next couple of years so that he can be that player's mentor. Draisaitl is supposed to be the most NHL-ready player of the draft (according to some scouts). Nylander could be ready for the 2015 season. Think about it... By the way, I haven't mentioned Horvat because I don't see him being on the same level as Draisaitl or Nylander. I think he will make a fine replacement for Kesler as our #2 C.
  9. Just a couple of points...You guys do realize that this year was Ehlers' first year in NA, don't you? For anyone (European or Russian) to come over to NA and have the season that Ehlers did their FIRST year speaks volumes! And, as the year progressed, and his adjustment to the ice and to the game grew, so did his performance. This guy is an incredible talent. And as far as the idea that his numbers are inflated due to playing with Drouin...I think some people were saying the same thing about Drouin (playing with McKinnon!). If the Canucks choose Ehlers, I expect he will be playing another season in Juniors. Probably without Drouin. That will be fun to watch!
  10. Exactly! This is a total classless cop-out by a coach who knows he's lost his job! AV would never have passed the buck like this. Age has nothing to do with it, you guys. It has everything to do with coaching and luck (injuries). Look at Detroit - they an "aging" team, with a core that is older than the Canucks. Yet, again, they are in the playoff mix (and taking it to Boston!).
  11. I don't agree that hiring Linden is just a PR stunt. I think the owners looked at the situation down in Denver and decided to replicate it. Sakic has the same job description, and seems to be doing very well...despite having no prior GM experience! Both Sakic and Linden have always been students of the game, and it was always just a matter of time before they took management positions. I think Linden will do very well. Look how well Gillis did...who also had no GM/management experience!
×
×
  • Create New...