JoshuaGuy

Members
  • Content count

    1,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,017 Revered

About JoshuaGuy

  • Rank
    Canucks Prospect
  • Birthday 12/14/1979

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Prince George
  • Interests
    Car Audio
    Home Audio
    Canucks hockey
    Photography
    My German Shepherd
    Movies

Recent Profile Visitors

4,638 profile views
  1. Keep a good grip on those sticks tonight boys..
  2. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    Rule 56, Interference, 56.2: A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who deliberately knocks a stick out of an opponent’s hand, or who prevents a player who has dropped his stick or any other piece of equipment from regaining possession of it. This doesn’t specify it has to be a 2 hand downward motion, does it? So far your argument is “it’s not called because it’s not called” as far as I can tell.
  3. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    Lol. Context man!
  4. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    the farcical rape scenario was as a tad much I suppose. It’s absurd but so is saying he should just hold his stick harder. Where the hell is a ref supposed to draw that line and why do we think it’s okay for the ref to be the one drawing that line.
  5. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    Alright. What I’ve gathered from these interactions is questioning the conventional wisdom is not your, or riffraffs thing. It was an obvious hyperbole. Have a good day.
  6. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    No argument here.
  7. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    If it were called and called consistently from the beginning, players just wouldn’t do it. I don’t deny grey areas exist, I just don’t like them.
  8. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    Anyway, like I said, don’t really care. Didn’t change the outcome of the game I just would like to see the obvious disparity in officiating. Let’s see Edler flick the stick out of Forsbergs hands away from the puck next game.
  9. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    According to written law though, which in my experience doesn’t have grey areas written in them. “Okay sir, you definitely raped her but in your defense she wasn’t squeezing her knees together very tightly. I don’t know if her legs are injured or if she just has the leg strength of a 5 year old but she should’ve squeezed harder.” Nope.
  10. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    The puck wasn’t anywhere near him though. How he grips his stick when puck isn’t in play is no ones business. It was enough force to send it 15 feet in the air. Maybe he was in the middle of readjusting his grip? Shouldn’t matter. It’s not a legal play. Injured hand? Shouldn’t matter ... not a legal play.
  11. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    I’m not talking about humans though, I’m talking about rules put in place. I can understand extenuating circumstances but when it comes to following every day law/rules, it should be black and white. Theft is theft, assault is assault and the penalties should be dealt accordingly.
  12. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    You as well!
  13. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    I don’t like grey areas. Not just hockey related, I like rules to be black and white.
  14. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    So if I just lightly cross checked your face, you’re okay with that? I mean it’s technically against the rules but I was somewhat gentle. I am not disagreeing that Tanev should maybe hold his stick, but aside from that it’s illegal to knock his stick out of his hands as per official nhl rule book.
  15. [PGT] Vancouver Canucks vs. Winnipeg Jets

    Rule 56, Interference, 56.2: A minor penalty shall be imposed on a player who deliberately knocks a stick out of an opponent’s hand, or who prevents a player who has dropped his stick or any other piece of equipment from regaining possession of it.