SoTzuMe

Members
  • Content count

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

273 Excellent

About SoTzuMe

  • Rank
    Aces Star
  • Birthday 09/27/1988

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    zunto17@hotmail.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Waterloo, ON / North Vancouver, BC
  1. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Well, thinking a player's plus-rating is earned solely on his own is a little naïve. He takes risks, and the team backs him up when they need to. He's gotten good enough at timing his pinches and knowing when to jump up in the play that it's become a big asset to the team. Man, what an effort on the last goal. Unreal.
  2. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Not his strongest game, but, damn, what an effort on the winning goal. He's a high risk, high reward player.
  3. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    A breakdown of the Bieksa's ES TOI by defence partner so far this year: DAN HAMHUIS 73.13% KEITH BALLARD 11.73% ANDREW ALBERTS 7.74% ALEXANDER EDLER 5.48% AARON ROME 1.92% Clearly, since Bieksa can't have played almost 3/4 of his TOI in the past month, he must have played substantial time with Hamhuis prior to the team's turnaround. They were split for a bit when neither was playing well, but were promptly reunited.
  4. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    NAME (Corsi Rel) Kevin Bieksa (8.1) Dan Hamhuis (5.9) Alex Edler (11.7) Alberts (-23.3) Sami Salo (5.9) K Ballard (-20.1) Aaron Rome (0.5) If you knew what Corsi Rel was, you would realize it's completely moronic to list a set of percentages. Note that Bieksa has the highest QoC (Quality of Competition) among Vancouver defensemen as well. That means exactly what you think it means; he plays against the opponents' best.
  5. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Bieksa is now +1 on the year.
  6. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    *enters topic* *sees that retorts already exist for CANUCKLELION'S latest baseless rant* *gives +'s to Baggins and Sameer to offset CANUCKLELION'S -'s* *leaves*
  7. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Bieksa never hit the open market, so the market didn't prove anything. "I won." Hahaha. Could you be more of a baby?
  8. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Summary Paragraph 1: Cherry-pick games and state that games that he doesn't choose "don't count". Paragraph 2: Refers to prior seasons for no good reason and views year of improvement as a reason for criticism. Paragraph 3: Criticizes stat, but then proceeds to invent stat and assign his arbitrary value to Bieksa without justification. Paragraph 4: Another invented stat with arbitrary value assigned. Claims Bieksa can't play D and then displays that he doesn't understand how to judge NHL contracts.
  9. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    You think a team that was clearly the best team in the regular season and won 15 games in the playoffs wasn't good enough to win the cup? So only one team in any given year is good enough to win the cup. Brutal logic.
  10. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    They were clearly good enough to win a cup last year, so, like most of the time, your logic is clearly flawed.
  11. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    We've only played Buffalo once a year for a couple of years now. 6 divisional games * 4 teams = 24 4 non-divisional conference games * 10 teams = 40 1 non-conference game * 15 teams = 15 1 extra game against each Eastern Canadian team = 3 24 + 40 + 15 + 3 = 82 Hopefully with a new realignment, we get a home-and-home with every team.
  12. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Let's continue to make stuff up.
  13. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Let's make stuff up.
  14. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    That's assuming you think the team is going to be playing .500 hockey the rest of the year and miss the playoffs.
  15. Kevin Bieksa you are really...

    Because barely anyone agrees with you?