-
Posts
3,721 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Gallery
Everything posted by VIC_CITY
-
So a Vancouver Canuck can't travel to Burnaby?
-
Is that even possible at the moment? How would we get out from under a contract? I suppose we could mutually terminate Palmu's contract? I don't know if there's anyone else?
-
I'm pretty sure players are free to travel where ever they like (within reason) without the assistance of an AHL demotion.
-
Any word on whether we're in on any of the top college free agents?
-
[Speculation] Stecher might be on the market
VIC_CITY replied to HerrDrFunk's topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I get the intrigue but is Tryankin better defensively than Stetcher? Because he isn't better offensively and he isn't going to come much cheaper. IMO if we cut Stetcher, it will either be to plug Rafferty in or another lower salary or if it were a clear upgrade and I'm not sure Tryamkin is an upgrade. Sure, he's bigger but that doesn't necessarily mean better. Troy is also a favorite in the dressing room and amungst the fans. -
Assuming your math adds up (I'm far too lazy for that), thanks for doing that. I think your projections are spot on, save a few hundred K. Assuming guys are willing to sign for a bit of a hometown discount. I'm hoping we can get Jake for $2.5 though. Josh Leivo money. I'm assuming you left Leivo off your team? I was curious and very skeptical that we'd be able to re-sign everyone without trading significant prospects/picks. We'd definitely need to retain money at the minimum. It would be a godsend if we sent Loui down and eventually terminated his contract, but it's not something you can count on.
-
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I would love to get rid of Baertschi's contract but not at the expense of Woo. He's a gamer and we don't have anyone else like him in our system. Miles Wood would be nice, but is he that much of an improvement on Roussel that he would be worth giving but Woo for? Not for me. Prospects I'd consider trading: Lockwood Palmu Perron Brisebois Gadjovich Utunen Teves Jasek McDonough Chatfield Focht Karlsson Sautner Malone Tryamkin -
[Report] Isles looking for Defensive Forward
VIC_CITY replied to Provost's topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Motte or Schaller and decent return don't go in the same sentence. Motte might get you a late round pick but I doubt Schaller is worth anything, especially at his salary. -
-
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I'm not saying he can't play in the league, but he isn't even a star in the KHL, a league that is slightly better than the AHL. It would be unrealistic for us to expect him to be anything but a 3rd pairing defenseman at this point. -
[Signing] Oilers re-sign Darnell Nurse
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
What if you didn't have to actually live in Edmonton though? I mean, it could be a lot worse. They have all those banners in the rafters, one of the most storied histories in the NHL for an expansion team, which includes arguably the greateast hockey player of all time. They also have arguably the best player in NHL currently. Maybe you don't have to kill yourself afterall Monty. But don't let me get in the way of your suicide -
[Signing] Oilers re-sign Darnell Nurse
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
That's surprising. You'd think Nurse would have got less AAV for a player friendly term like that. If I'm an Oilers fan, this deal has me worried in the long term. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
I think our fan base generally overrates Tryamkin. He's a # 6-7 NHL defenseman. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
He's a pending UFA that would be a depth pick up. I don't think we're talking any serious assets here. Maybe the rights to Tryamkin or Lockwood and a 6th rounder gets it done? I like him too but there's no way we're trading with Edmonton. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Rick Dhaliwal actually reported the opposite. He said Jim made a call to Simmonds' agent, but no offer was made. He went onto say they were interested in both Simmonds and Ferland but went with Ferland because he was cheaper and younger. He also said Benning has been a big Simmonds fan since his days im Boston when his Bruins would play the Flyers. I'd take Rick's word over Lebrun, especially in this market. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
For the most part, I would agree with your first statement and I think Benning is on the same page. If we see any trades, I think they will be of the depth variety. As far as getting rid of a bad contract goes, that would be if Ferland isn't still on LTIR. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Well, for starters Simmonds is still an every day NHL player, whereas Bailey and MacEwen are not and have never been. Plus Simmons track record, experience (including playoffs) and leadership give him the edge, even though he's not the player he used to be. Unfortunately I don't think MacEwen or Bailey will have much of an NHL career ahead of them. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Do you mean his contract? $5M is definitely steep. Like a previous poster mentioned, this is likely in case Ferland ends up back on LTIR and if that happens, NJ would need to eat salary to bring it down to $3.5M. No one is going to take on that salary at full value. As far as the price goes, it can't be much more than a C prospect and late round pick. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
He's likely better than Schaller, MacEwen and Bailey. Even if he's our 13th forward, you need depth in a playoff run. There's bound to be injuries. He also plays a playoff style game. If the cost was minimal, it wouldn't be a bad acquisition. -
[Speculation] Canucks interested in Wayne Simmonds
VIC_CITY replied to -Vintage Canuck-'s topic in Trades, Rumours, Signings
Unfortunately not. Lockwood isn't enough to entice a team to take on Baertschi's contract, nevermind the cost of acquiring Simmons. Lockwood alone for Simmons might be enough if Lockwood is willing to sign in NJ. Maybe send a 6th or 7th round pick NJ's way as well. But we're going to have to give up at least a 3rd round pick or a B prospect to get rid of Baertschi's contract. I'd probably rate Lockwood as a C prospect at best. My 2 cents. -
Well, Dubas did you and Alf a solid last night. What other teams need a goalie? Edmonton and SJ (no thanks - divisional rivals). Chicago could be a player with both their goalies heading to UFA. I'd prefer sending Demko out east though. Perhaps Detroit? Jimmy Howard is a UFA..not sure who they plan on using as a starter? They could be a good target. What about Ottawa?