ChuckNORRIS4Cup

Well I wouldn't be trying to keep him tbh, if he stays he stays, but if you can move him that helps a trade in anyway you move him. Props to him being a multi sport athlete, but that's not enough for me to want to hang onto him at 29, maybe if he was still 23 I would have an approach more like you and Rupe, but at his age his window has basically closed, I just wouldn't be against moving him at all.

Yeah I just don't know what he was meaning...

Still don't like seeing Springer in between Guerrero and Hernandez, I noticed this happened a few games ago and see it's still happening, Vlad/Teo were a nice combo I wouldn't of split them up, Springer hasn't had a hit in 3 straight games could be 4 if he doesn't get one today, I don't understand this splitting up a good combo that was doing good.

Sorry I don't follow... What do you mean by break? I think I know what you mean like break up two fighting or something....

I was on a horse once and only once, never again. I was 7 or 8 years old, we were up near Timothy Lake area not sure exactly where, but there was this horse ranch that took people on tours through the woods, my parents thought it would be good for me and my friend to try something different. I was already against it didn't want to do it, finally was convinced to do it, but about halfway through our tour, we were going downhill towards this creek all the other horses walked through it fine but for some reason the horse I had didn't. All of a sudden the horse stops, leans up on his front legs lifting his whole back end which already being on a downhill slope caused me to flip over the top of it's head and down to the rocks, it hurt and I was pissed because I didn't want to do it to begin with and then that happened. Never wanted to be on a horse ever again.

Or Shatkins sells it to them I will throw in Davis, he just hasn't had the opportunity here with the guys we have, I believe a fresh start and opportunity would do wonders for him, and with his speed he could really excel if given the opportunity to play everyday

Not straight up definitely no value, but that's why I suggested using him as throw in basically in a package deal to maybe help persuade the other team involved maybe

When I searched Darlin Clementine it suggested Darling Clementine, and it showed a movie from 1947, so I was like I guess that's what he's implying but I'm not that old so not really sure...

Depends on Dickerson, because if he becomes healthy enough there is absolutely no room for Davis and it's going to be interesting with the rest of the OF then as well, although I do like that pinch runner option with speed, but not enough imo to keep him because if they have to rely on his bat at any time, that could be bad and I wouldn't want that. The bat is the issue, especially when you're trying to win, you need a catcher who can hit and move the lineup back to the top and keep it going, that's what wins you playoff games, and he isn't good enough for that and why he needs to be moved.

I'd move Davis if they can, he isn't amounting to anything imo, and I really don't like Jansen, I want him gone, although their value isn't high, maybe throw them into a deal to get a little more.

Yeah same here on prospects but did hear or see that same thing you have mentioned regarding them, this management props did help fill them by the sounds of it. This looks like a good place to start https://www.mlb.com/prospects/bluejays

Anytime you can make the lineup more deadly it's always interesting what if, but like you said they really don't need another bat they didn't need another bat in the off season when signing Springer imo, just pitching, pitching, pitching, that's all I want to see acquired going forward, but if it's a package like you're proposing and losing a weaker bat for that replacement as long as a pitcher is available sure. Wow he's 41 and hitting .299 pretty impressive actually at his age.

This is from yesterday and for anyone who followed this trade, I didn't.

Definitely early on in the season, he played horrible, fumbling the puck on his stick many times, couldn't make a pass, he did improve as the season went on, but it wasn't enough for me to go , he definitely didn't impress me enough this season, so if he wants out I don't care he didn't impress me enough.

What I tend to believe is our means of transportation are fueling the stronger mutations, which is prolonging it more. The more people who travel seem to either bring back, or bring a virus to a community, and the more they do that the more chances of it mutating into a stronger virus. I tend to believe this is what helped trigger the Spanish Flu, they were at war WW1, they were traveling and spreading the virus from other countries and making it worse, it wasn't until WW1 was over the following year the Spanish Flu finally went away after it weakened. I'm starting to lean towards after the war eneded the virus wasn't traveling as much now, and it just stayed in communities until it weakened and wasn't able to mutate with other strains of viruses anymore. With saying this though and if some of my logic is kind of correct, that wouldn't be good for us, because our means of transportation are way more advanced then in 1918, and if we keep this up this virus could linger for way longer because of our transportation.

This may help.... https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants

I don't 100% agree with that, I believe looking back at history, Spanish Flu with no vaccine it eventually weakened and life went back to normal but with a big hit sadly with how many died, it was definitely a strong virus like the one we're dealing with now a days, but it eventually weakened to not be serious enough. Sars another example of a virus that wasn't as strong to start, but again weakened and went away without a vaccine, Mers another virus like Sars that went away without a vaccine. The trend does show they do eventually weaken enough and go away even without a vaccine, they didn't rely on a vaccine to stop it in the past, so I do believe it will weaken eventually it's just when really.

Or maybe they will eventually mutate into weaker and weaker ones like in the past without vaccines.....

Schmidt and Eriksson for OEL done deal

Good for you thumbs up. Yes hopefully by then things are looking good, we just have to keep an eye on this delta variant I believe first, and hopefully that will be the end of these bad mutations, as long as no other ones mutate we could be good, but that's still up in the air literally.

@Pears One down one more to go

I tried doing some looking at what the limit is, looks like in 2015 the IOC set the limit to 10nmol/L. The athlete's total testosterone level in serum must remain below 10 nmol/L throughout the period of desired eligibility to compete in the female category. But then in 2018 the IAAF separate from Olympics though, set this new rule. The regulations, proposed by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) in 2018, state that women must have a blood testosterone level of 5 nmol/L or less at all times in order to compete. Doctors measure testosterone in nanomoles per litre (nmol/l) and the reported “normal” healthy range in males is anywhere from 9.2 to 31.8 nmol/L. It is about ten times lower in females, with “normal” levels considered to be between 0.3 and 2.4 nmol/L. Despite these lower levels in women, testosterone circulates in the blood at higher concentrations than oestrogen, the typical female hormone. But it is difficult to know what is the right level of testosterone, and these ranges are often not agreed on by experts from different societies, countries or laboratories. Now my question is what were these athletes nmol/L? It must of been pretty high...