Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

1994_fan

Members
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1994_fan

  1. Oh wait, search bar wasn't working properly... I see a whole bunch of posts.
  2. Oh finally a Dalibor Dvorsky post! Yes I think this guy would be good for the nucks
  3. How come no one here is considering Dalibor Dvorsky as the guys the nucks should pick? Seen some of the analyst reference him as "200 ft" player currently playing in SHL against men and holding his own. Has "smarts" is "quick" and is a C.. kind of what the nucks are looking for, no? Oh and he's 6'1 and 200lbs already.... so? What gives? Even if he were to spend 1-2 years refining, still seems better than some of the NAM center options around when the nucks will pick. Anyway, let's hear it
  4. What if instead of Miller or Boeser, it's Horvat for Fiala, Boldy and a pick. Bo is the Center Minni needs ... after reading about the possible 'team relation' problems. I think it's him that's lost the room. haven't posted in 4 years so don't jump me for not tagging
  5. long time not posting... so don't light me up with gasoline for not using the right format SO as of today the nucks are not in the play off, does that mean we don't give TB our conditional 1st round pick?
  6. Thanks for starting this.... and taking the initial wave of fire grenades I certainly enjoy the draft and the weeks heading into it, and just like with Netflix I can't just drop it once I've sat 10 hours straight consuming all the new episodes of my fav series. So, with that in mind let's begin brain storming about 2017 Based on http://www.draftsite.com/nhl/mock-draft/2017/ the Canucks have the following 3 picks (and yeah the exact order will change). But for the purpose of this discussion let's say that we fall within 5 spots of these. 1st round - 3 - 12 OA 2nd round - 33 - 43 OA 3rd round - 64 - 74 OA *there's the CBJ 2nd round pick... but I'm not totally sure* It would be luck and only luck that we land the 1st overall, thus I'm not counting on landing P. Nolan. Which prospects look interesting near the 1st 3 picks the Canucks have? These are mine: A. Vesalainen - RW 6.3 skating is his distinction http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=222125 has rep Finland and playing with older kids N. Hague - D 6.6 size OHL kid invited last 2 years to national team http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=253977 M. Rasmussen - C 6.5 local boy, with size at key position http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=286738 good numbers H. Leufuenius - C 6.2 http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=264220 seems like he's been dominant the last 3 years I'm hoping that we can snag at least 2 of these kids next year. Please share what prospects you think we should keep our eyes on.
  7. Has anyone else under the impression that Gaunce gets no love from any media source, or on these boards? The guy is having an awesome start for this 1st Utica season and gets a footnote of a mention. I like Bo and Shink but this kid is solid too. Another one like him is Cassels, barely gets a mentioned before this year.
  8. John Garrett has become more of a fan than a true reporter. However we can't fault him for that; he's paid to follow this team. I too, thought his conspiracy idea was more something a fan tends to feel and express. Having said all that, I do find it hilarious that currently (after game 13) Daniel Sedin (yes that goon) is leading the Canucks in penalty minutes and his goon brother tie for 3rd with Kassian and behind Sestito. So, perhaps there's something to be said about Garrett's theory??
×
×
  • Create New...