StraightFlush

Members
  • Content count

    433
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

142 Good

About StraightFlush

  • Rank
    Comets Regular

Recent Profile Visitors

932 profile views
  1. He didn't play the full year sadly. Didn't wanna protect the kids, couldn't skate..... did he actually do something useful in the four? Months he got paid to "play" for Vancouver? the people that are all like "oh he played his heart out gave it every shift..." Blah blah. you got nothing but disgust and remorse from me. remorse for me having to type this, and disgust that you probably think you are still correct in your poor judgement. *im agreeing with drummerboy by the way. I wanted to quote people who thought Prust "did a good job", but found it easier to quote someone not spewing rainbows and unicorns out the thing Prust sat on for most of the year.
  2. Of course he will score. He will actually try to there, just like he's done every other time he has "gone back to Arizona" seriously this ain't his first pay check rodeo. Look at his stats *edit* yes I looked at his stats . He always goes back to the desert.
  3. Not quite a big gritty forward. No thanks
  4. It's more likely he signs on as one of the Lions cheerleaders
  5. I thought it was a really stupid idea for Schroeder to try arbitration, as if he's proved anything except that he can't handle the nhl. Now he has had to be all like "aw gee pa, I never meant nothing by it I was foolin. " Not 100% sure how arbitration works when the player is placed on waivers cause you know, 99% of the time the players actually deserve a raise, but if possible, if I was Minnesota, I'd let him walk. No TQ for joo! If if they are stuck with him, well then benning was right. Gee golly shucks
  6. This is bad. Very thumbs down
  7. Harder and faster I can do...but deeper? ......wait what are we talking about?
  8. No....no....that's exactly what leafs fans deserve. In the end, you get what you pay for and those fans seem to have no issues with paying crazy ticket prices to see said ahl team. Way better off watching the jays or Argos play. At least if those teams lose you don't end up saying to yourself...."man I just spent $500 on two tickets, and $60 on six watered down beer that came in a plastic cup, with a straw". (I did that btw, live in Edmonton so I paid to see the nucks play in rexall. I learned my lesson. Waste of $600. Even Vancouver played terrible)
  9. He will be in Utica. The only reason he was on the Canucks last year was so they could have a bigger hand in how he developed. Canucks would have had no say if he was still in juniors, and who knows what kind of bad habits he would have or could have picked up.
  10. He will be in Utica. The only reason he was on the Canucks last year was so they could have a bigger hand in how he developed. Canucks would have had no say if he was still in juniors, and who knows what kind of bad habits he would have or could have picked up.
  11. Yeah I am interested too. you know , about things that make the Canucks a better , long term team. why do people feel the need to post baseless rumours and "start conversation "? where is the pimp slap button, cause people need one.
  12. One a day keeps the doc..... no wait thats not right is it?
  13. Schroeder ? He's still in the nhl?
  14. Heh I wonder how many people are like..."didn't that guy play for St. Louis in the 70's?"
  15. Oh close your butt cheeks Nancy, all I'm saying is "contend" is a pretty strong word, and to use it with the word "Buffalo" you may as well say..... "With one or two more pieces, Toronto can contend for the cup". Or "With one or two more pieces, Vancouver can contend for the cup." they may be getting better, but to call them contenders, even with two more pieces, is a little far fetched seeing as they haven't even made the playoffs in....how long?