Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1051 User is offline   ModoExpress 


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 01:40 PM

who is number 1?
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#1052 User is offline   Alexander Ovechkin 


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,087
  • Joined: 21-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:02 PM

CCF4E said:

Canucks rank 22 in terms of prospects according to The Hockey News


YIkes. Can i have a source?
0

#1053 User is offline   Canadian 


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,123
  • Joined: 09-May 03

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:15 PM

Alexander Ovechkin said:

CCF4E said:

Canucks rank 22 in terms of prospects according to The Hockey News


YIkes. Can i have a source?
Someone the other day went thru the latest HN magazine and posted all of the info regarding prospects in it. One such article/section was regarding the team-by-team analysis of prospects. Pittsburgh, and Nashville are at the top, and 22 sounds right for what Vancouver was.
IN LUONGO WE TRUST


0

#1054 User is offline   CCF4E 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:28 PM

SORRY, I MADE A MISTAKE, VANCOUVER IS IN FACT RANKED #24




Well heres how the teams ranked
1.Pittsburgh
2.Washington
3.Nashville
4.L.A.
5.Chicago
6.Boston
7.Anaheim
8.St. Louis
9.Montreal
10. NYR
11. Columbus
12. Phoenix
13. Florida
14. San Jose
15.Colorado
16.Calgary
17.NYI
18.Edmonton
19.Minny
20.Buffalo
21.Philly
22.Detroit
23.Dallas
24.Vancouver
25.Ottawa
26.Atlanta
27.New Jersey
28.Toronto
29.Carolina
30. Tampa Bay

Also, they ranked the top 75 prospects for the NHL
the Canucks had 3 in the top 75,
Bourdon-9
Schnieder-38
Grabner-64

Also, our top 10 prospects according to THN are
1.Luc Bourdon
2.Cory Schnieder
3.Michael Grabner
4.Alexander Edler
5.Juraj Simel
6.Mason Raymond
7.Jannik Hansen
8.Sergei Shirokov
9.Daniel Rahimi
10Julien Ellis

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1055 User is offline   thecupismine 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,360
  • Joined: 27-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:36 PM

CCF4E said:

SORRY, I MADE A MISTAKE, VANCOUVER IS IN FACT RANKED #24




Well heres how the teams ranked
1.Pittsburgh
2.Washington
3.Nashville
4.L.A.
5.Chicago
6.Boston
7.Anaheim
8.St. Louis
9.Montreal
10. NYR
11. Columbus
12. Phoenix
13. Florida
14. San Jose
15.Colorado
16.Calgary
17.NYI
18.Edmonton
19.Minny
20.Buffalo
21.Philly
22.Detroit
23.Dallas
24.Vancouver
25.Ottawa
26.Atlanta
27.New Jersey
28.Toronto
29.Carolina
30. Tampa Bay

Also, they ranked the top 75 prospects for the NHL
the Canucks had 3 in the top 75,
Bourdon-9
Schnieder-38
Grabner-64

Also, our top 10 prospects according to THN are
1.Luc Bourdon
2.Cory Schnieder
3.Michael Grabner
4.Alexander Edler
5.Juraj Simel
6.Mason Raymond
7.Jannik Hansen
8.Sergei Shirokov
9.Daniel Rahimi
10Julien Ellis


Well they're ratings of everything sounds about right. I think under Nonis though our drafting will improve a fair amount, because if you look at all of those players most were drafted by Nonis. I have confidence that he'll do even better this year, with the addition of a big center future first line center and depth in all the positions.
0

#1056 User is offline   -mb 


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:44 PM

I believe the rankings of the Canucks Top 10 were made by Steve Tambellini. Interesting that he has Simek at #5. I understand he had a solid camp, and was on fire at the beginning of the season but it appears he has slowed down significantly in the second half of the season.
0

#1057 User is offline   CCF4E 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:52 PM

mball said:

I believe the rankings of the Canucks Top 10 were made by Steve Tambellini.  Interesting that he has Simek at #5.  I understand he had a solid camp, and was on fire at the beginning of the season but it appears he has slowed down significantly in the second half of the season.
I dont think so, he commented on the top 5, and under the title is says"By Elliot Pap"

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1058 User is offline   leo2892 


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,582
  • Joined: 05-April 04

Posted 11 March 2007 - 02:59 PM

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
Proud Cody Hodgson fan since 2007.


Mike Keane is my hero.
0

#1059 User is offline   CCF4E 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 03:03 PM

leo2892 said:

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
I found that strange too :?

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1060 User is offline   Dortmund 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 03:23 PM

CCF4E said:

leo2892 said:

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
I found that strange too :?



This list obviously includes players who are rookies on their team because Colorado outside of Wolski and Stastny have a terrible crop of players. Pitts isn't amazing either beyound their current stars. I'm refering to junior/college/AHL type players.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1061 User is offline   ModoExpress 


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 03:25 PM

on the top 75 prospects

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#1062 User is offline   Dortmund 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 03:29 PM

ModoExpress said:

on the top 75 prospects  

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him



probally only because he's graduated to the AHL and is playing better competition than Schneider. I'm sure that could change as soon as Schneid turns pro.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1063 User is offline   timw33 


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 04:34 PM

Dortmund said:

ModoExpress said:

on the top 75 prospects  

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him



probally only because he's graduated to the AHL and is playing better competition than Schneider. I'm sure that could change as soon as Schneid turns pro.


Yep, we will see once Schnieder plays pro hockey.

So is that THN Future Watch magazine on stands now??
Posted Image
0

#1064 User is offline   CCF4E 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 04:55 PM

timw33 said:

Dortmund said:

ModoExpress said:

on the top 75 prospects  

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him



probally only because he's graduated to the AHL and is playing better competition than Schneider. I'm sure that could change as soon as Schneid turns pro.


Yep, we will see once Schnieder plays pro hockey.

So is that THN Future Watch magazine on stands now??
I'm assuming it is, because i subscribe to it

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1065 User is offline   timw33 


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 05:00 PM

CCF4E said:

timw33 said:

Dortmund said:

ModoExpress said:

on the top 75 prospects  

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him



probally only because he's graduated to the AHL and is playing better competition than Schneider. I'm sure that could change as soon as Schneid turns pro.


Yep, we will see once Schnieder plays pro hockey.

So is that THN Future Watch magazine on stands now??
I'm assuming it is, because i subscribe to it


Hmm, They didnt have it at Pharmasave, but I'll bet London Drugs has it.
Posted Image
0

#1066 User is offline   CCF4E 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 05:02 PM

BTW Eric Johnson is the #1 prospect

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1067 User is offline   Grabner 


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,745
  • Joined: 18-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 05:29 PM

Dortmund said:

ModoExpress said:

on the top 75 prospects  

why is pogge rated higher than schneider..?

pogge isn't doing so hot on the marlins.. d-mac owns him



probally only because he's graduated to the AHL and is playing better competition than Schneider. I'm sure that could change as soon as Schneid turns pro.


Exactly, the rankings are not solely based on potential. They also take into account how long before the player in question will make it to the NHL.
0

#1068 User is offline   Blister Soul 


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,849
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 06:34 PM

We don't get the HN or any good magazines in Templeton anymore, aside from Macleans and Time.

(2000th)

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee

Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1069 User is offline   timw33 


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 09:28 PM

So yeah, havent been able to find future watch 2007....

Anyone have ideas.
Posted Image
0

#1070 User is offline   The Big Luongo 


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 563
  • Joined: 04-November 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 09:34 PM

Mason Raymonds team was eliminated 3-2 tonight in triple overtime . Mason Raymond had one assist and it was said that he had many good scoring chances and was the games 3rd star .
0
  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.

Contact Us | Map & Parking | Sponsorship | Employment Opportunities | General Motors Place | Ownership | Privacy Policy | NHL.com Terms of Use