Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1071 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 11 March 2007 - 09:43 PM

The Big Luongo said:

Mason Raymonds team was eliminated 3-2 tonight in triple overtime . Mason Raymond had one assist and it was said that he had many good scoring chances and was the games 3rd star .


That's too bad. Even though it was expected they would have an early exit it would have been nice if they had at least a short playoff run.
0

#1072 User is offline   Millerdraft Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,933
  • Joined: 02-March 04

Posted 11 March 2007 - 09:47 PM

The Big Luongo said:

Mason Raymonds team was eliminated 3-2 tonight in triple overtime . Mason Raymond had one assist and it was said that he had many good scoring chances and was the games 3rd star .


Can he join the Moose now? Or does that kind of move make him ineligible to return to the Collegiate ranks? If it's anything like NCAA basketball, he'd be ineligible.

Edit: NVM Draft makes basketball players ineligible.
QUOTE (Tripwyre)
Can't spell Kesler without Selke.

QUOTE (VictorHedman @ Aug 23 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Slapyourself if you think Kesler will score 25+ goals, he just doesn't have the offensive skill.
0

#1073 User is offline   The Big Luongo Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 688
  • Joined: 04-November 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 09:53 PM

mball said:

The Big Luongo said:

Mason Raymonds team was eliminated 3-2 tonight in triple overtime . Mason Raymond had one assist and it was said that he had many good scoring chances and was the games 3rd star .


That's too bad. Even though it was expected they would have an early exit it would have been nice if they had at least a short playoff run.


Apparently Raymonds team did all they could and just fell short and the play by play guy said that Minnesota probably deserved to win this series .
0

#1074 User is offline   ModoExpress Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 11 March 2007 - 10:46 PM

Millerdraft said:

The Big Luongo said:

Mason Raymonds team was eliminated 3-2 tonight in triple overtime . Mason Raymond had one assist and it was said that he had many good scoring chances and was the games 3rd star .


Can he join the Moose now? Or does that kind of move make him ineligible to return to the Collegiate ranks? If it's anything like NCAA basketball, he'd be ineligible.

Edit: NVM Draft makes basketball players ineligible.
i don't think he has a contract with the nucks, so i would assume he cna't play for the moose.

rahimi has a contract and once his season is over, he'll come to the moose
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#1075 User is offline   Wadim Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 168
  • Joined: 13-August 03

Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:39 AM

Raymond can sign an amateur tryout contract which would allow him to play for the moose without being on the clear-day roster. It would likely end his college career though. Not sure if its a guaranteed loss of eligibility but he would be cutting his school year short if he left which would likely be a sign of him permanently leaving.
0

#1076 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,022
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 12 March 2007 - 07:42 AM

Collegate players cannot play pro hockey without losing their eligibility. Major Junior players can re-establish their amateur status by sitting out a year.
0

#1077 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,251
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 09:21 AM

Boudrias said:

Collegate players cannot play pro hockey without losing their eligibility. Major Junior players can re-establish their amateur status by sitting out a year.


Not if their team is eliminated from their junior season. Staal(marc) played for Hartford Wolfpack last season in the playoffs after Sudbury was eliminated. He's playing for Sudbury this year.

Oh and don't worry about Bourdon's stats because his equivalent junior comparison Staal stats are very simular:

Staal

51 GP 5 G 29 A 34 Pts +6 62 PIM


Bourdon

33 GP 4 G 15 A 19 Pts +22 65 PIM (17 in his last game :) )


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1078 User is offline   themcleanianone Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,222
  • Joined: 26-February 07

Posted 12 March 2007 - 11:49 AM

do bourdon and staal play in the same league, because if they did these are great numbers for bourdon, to be up there with staal who everyone talks about.

0

#1079 User is offline   Cooke_Hart Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,790
  • Joined: 08-July 03

Posted 12 March 2007 - 01:03 PM

No, Bourdon plays in the more offensive QMJHL while Staal plays in the tougher OHL. Bourdon's also expected to be a more offensive player.

I haven't been watching his games so I don't know why his numbers are down. Even offensive defenceman are often at the mercy of the forwards as far as helping the Dman put points on the board. However, with Bourdon's big boom boom I'm surprised he doesn't have more goals from PP time.

I wonder if his confidence is hurting from his time with the Canucks, or perhaps he still has some nagging injuries ...

Canucks
Tottenham
San Fran 49ers
---------------------------
Glutton For Punishment
0

#1080 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,251
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:51 PM

Cooke_Hart said:

No, Bourdon plays in the more offensive QMJHL while Staal plays in the tougher OHL. Bourdon's also expected to be a more offensive player.

I haven't been watching his games so I don't know why his numbers are down. Even offensive defenceman are often at the mercy of the forwards as far as helping the Dman put points on the board. However, with Bourdon's big boom boom I'm surprised he doesn't have more goals from PP time.

I wonder if his confidence is hurting from his time with the Canucks, or perhaps he still has some nagging injuries ...



I wouldn't call the OHL defensive by any means. More goals are scored in that league than any other, the goalies have some of the worst stats in terms of comparison to the other two leagues.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1081 User is offline   __xxccnineteen Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Joined: 15-June 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 02:54 PM

Dortmund said:

CCF4E said:

leo2892 said:

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
I found that strange too :?



This list obviously includes players who are rookies on their team because Colorado outside of Wolski and Stastny have a terrible crop of players. Pitts isn't amazing either beyound their current stars. I'm refering to junior/college/AHL type players.


Well they got LEtang.

so

Crosby
Malkin
Staal
Fleury
Letang

Letang coulld get 80 points in the NHL one day MAF is a potential allstar, Staal is a 41 goal scorer some day, Malkin could be Bure, and Crosby, well he PWNS ovechkin.

^me on the sig.
... VISIT MY WEBSITE AT...
[[THIS LINK]].
for more sigs walls logos' etc!
0

#1082 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 03:04 PM

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Dortmund said:

CCF4E said:

leo2892 said:

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
I found that strange too :?



This list obviously includes players who are rookies on their team because Colorado outside of Wolski and Stastny have a terrible crop of players. Pitts isn't amazing either beyound their current stars. I'm refering to junior/college/AHL type players.


Well they got LEtang.

so

Crosby
Malkin
Staal
Fleury
Letang

Letang coulld get 80 points in the NHL one day MAF is a potential allstar, Staal is a 41 goal scorer some day, Malkin could be Bure, and Crosby, well he PWNS ovechkin.


Posted Image

Ya, so it is a slow prospect day....

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1083 User is offline   Millerdraft Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,933
  • Joined: 02-March 04

Posted 12 March 2007 - 04:33 PM

Boudrias said:

Collegate players cannot play pro hockey without losing their eligibility.


Thought so but I wasn't positive. Thanks for verifying my suspicions. Too bad for Raymond though. Makes for a bit of a tough decision seeing as how well he's doing both academically (won one of the nation's academic awards) and hockey wise. My money's on another year of College, unfortunately, but what do I know? His team sucks and he may want out.
QUOTE (Tripwyre)
Can't spell Kesler without Selke.

QUOTE (VictorHedman @ Aug 23 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Slapyourself if you think Kesler will score 25+ goals, he just doesn't have the offensive skill.
0

#1084 User is offline   Cooke_Hart Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,790
  • Joined: 08-July 03

Posted 12 March 2007 - 04:33 PM

Well there's been talk of playing Letang as a forward ...

Canucks
Tottenham
San Fran 49ers
---------------------------
Glutton For Punishment
0

#1085 User is offline   Cooke_Hart Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,790
  • Joined: 08-July 03

Posted 12 March 2007 - 04:36 PM

Dortmund said:

Cooke_Hart said:

No, Bourdon plays in the more offensive QMJHL while Staal plays in the tougher OHL. Bourdon's also expected to be a more offensive player.

I haven't been watching his games so I don't know why his numbers are down. Even offensive defenceman are often at the mercy of the forwards as far as helping the Dman put points on the board. However, with Bourdon's big boom boom I'm surprised he doesn't have more goals from PP time.

I wonder if his confidence is hurting from his time with the Canucks, or perhaps he still has some nagging injuries ...



I wouldn't call the OHL defensive by any means. More goals are scored in that league than any other, the goalies have some of the worst stats in terms of comparison to the other two leagues.


The general consensus is that the Q is the weakest defensive league.

Like I say though, I haven't seen Bourdon in junior this year so I can't really comment on his numbers. It may mean something, it may mean nothing.

Canucks
Tottenham
San Fran 49ers
---------------------------
Glutton For Punishment
0

#1086 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 05:49 PM

Cooke_Hart said:

No, Bourdon plays in the more offensive QMJHL while Staal plays in the tougher OHL. Bourdon's also expected to be a more offensive player.

I haven't been watching his games so I don't know why his numbers are down. Even offensive defenceman are often at the mercy of the forwards as far as helping the Dman put points on the board. However, with Bourdon's big boom boom I'm surprised he doesn't have more goals from PP time.

I wonder if his confidence is hurting from his time with the Canucks, or perhaps he still has some nagging injuries ...


Hes being used as a shut-down d-man with Cape Breton, he was an offensive beast with Moncton because hes wa sbeing used in an offensive role, but cape breton has enough socring punch as is, what they didnt have was bruising shutdown guy, so they brought in Bourdon to mold him into that
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1087 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 06:17 PM

Any 1 got an action shot of Shirokov? I need a new sig
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1088 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,070
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 06:46 PM

toxic rd said:

Any 1 got an action shot of Shirokov? I need a new sig


Ooh! That's going to be naice!

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1089 User is offline   AK-47 Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,746
  • Joined: 08-December 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 06:48 PM

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Dortmund said:

CCF4E said:

leo2892 said:

Why is Calgary ranked 16th? Aside from Irving and Boyd, they don't have a lot of quality prospects.
I found that strange too :?



This list obviously includes players who are rookies on their team because Colorado outside of Wolski and Stastny have a terrible crop of players. Pitts isn't amazing either beyound their current stars. I'm refering to junior/college/AHL type players.


Well they got LEtang.

so

Crosby
Malkin
Staal
Fleury
Letang

Letang coulld get 80 points in the NHL one day MAF is a potential allstar, Staal is a 41 goal scorer some day, Malkin could be Bure, and Crosby, well he PWNS ovechkin.


Pittsburgh is gonna be scary talented in the next 3 years, how many tiems we play them next years anyone know ansyewre?

and curious: why choose number 41 goals? not 40 or 50? why 41

LOL

Malkin. Semin. Ovechkin. Kovalchuk.
RIP Alexei Cherepanov and Michael Jackson
AK ♚ 47
0

#1090 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 12 March 2007 - 06:48 PM

Simek, Shirokov and Raymond are impossible to find good action shots of, my sig choices are running low
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.