Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1171 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 15 March 2007 - 08:11 PM

toxic rd said:

Indeed, man do i hate the international transfer window rule, they should be able to go wherever they want once their season ends, Shirokov;s season could theoretically end in the next 2 weeks, but he wont be allowed to come over here until the summer


Yeah that definitly sucks.

But with any luck, he will be at camp (hopefully 10 pounds heavier)
Posted Image
0

#1172 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 15 March 2007 - 09:04 PM

MA Bernier has 2 goals tonight for the Salmon Kings.
Posted Image
0

#1173 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 15 March 2007 - 09:06 PM

I was just looking at the prospect rankings and I must've zoned out the past few months. Where did Patrick Kane come from? :shock:

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee

Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1174 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 15 March 2007 - 09:07 PM

The Imposter said:

I was just looking at the prospect rankings and I must've zoned out the past few months. Where did Patrick Kane come from?  :shock:


He's been there for a while actually.

He's one of like 6 guys who could easily go #1.
Posted Image
0

#1175 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 15 March 2007 - 09:36 PM

Ellis wins 6-3, Bernier had 2g 1a

S-Kings continue their march for a playoff spot
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1176 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 12:02 AM

Mike27 said:

6. Out of all the Canuck prospects who have a chance of turning pro next season, and possibly playing for the Moose next year, who are you most excited about? Brett - Winnipeg, MB  
I think it's difficult to narrow it down to one player because sometimes expectations exceed development. I think next year, the Canucks have a good crop of young players coming in, probably the biggest and the brightest that they've had in their time here, but we've had success. Guys have developed: Nathan McIver's developed, Mike Brown's developed, Jannik Hansen's developed. It's up to them to a certain point. They have some decent guys coming next year: Mason Raymond, the kid that plays in Brandon (Simak), maybe Luc Bourdon, Daniel Rahimi, who we might possibly see at the end of the year. I think they have a good crop of prospects, but there's not one guy in particular. They have Corey Schneider coming in from Boston College, which is a high-profile prospect. But I think you've got to be careful not to put too much expectations and see where guys play out.  

Interesting answers, he is expecting Raymond and Schneider to turn pro next year.............


who are you talking about?.

I highly doubt both of them will turn Pro next year. Although, I do think Raymond will leave school early....

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1177 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,866
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 16 March 2007 - 07:58 AM

Why does everyone assume that the Moose will take all these juniors and college players onto their roster going into playoffs? Their team is pretty much set now. They are playing solid hockey and lead their conference. Pending injuries I don't see any significant moves.
0

#1178 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 08:45 AM

Boudrias said:

Why does everyone assume that the Moose will take all these juniors and college players onto their roster going into playoffs? Their team is pretty much set now. They are playing solid hockey and lead their conference. Pending injuries I don't see any significant moves.


Well if a player like Grabby or Bourdon gets eliminated early I can see them coming and playing for the Moose.

Bourdon >>>>>>>>> Coloumbe, McIvar, Fortunus, ok all Moose D
Grabby >>>>>>>>>> Reid ok almost all Moose snipers besides Jaff/Moran


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1179 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 08:57 AM

itzabreeze said:

Mike27 said:

6. Out of all the Canuck prospects who have a chance of turning pro next season, and possibly playing for the Moose next year, who are you most excited about? Brett - Winnipeg, MB  
I think it's difficult to narrow it down to one player because sometimes expectations exceed development. I think next year, the Canucks have a good crop of young players coming in, probably the biggest and the brightest that they've had in their time here, but we've had success. Guys have developed: Nathan McIver's developed, Mike Brown's developed, Jannik Hansen's developed. It's up to them to a certain point. They have some decent guys coming next year: Mason Raymond, the kid that plays in Brandon (Simak), maybe Luc Bourdon, Daniel Rahimi, who we might possibly see at the end of the year. I think they have a good crop of prospects, but there's not one guy in particular. They have Corey Schneider coming in from Boston College, which is a high-profile prospect. But I think you've got to be careful not to put too much expectations and see where guys play out.  

Interesting answers, he is expecting Raymond and Schneider to turn pro next year.............


who are you talking about?.

I highly doubt both of them will turn Pro next year. Although, I do think Raymond will leave school early....


Moose GM
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1180 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 11:42 AM

toxic rd said:

itzabreeze said:

Mike27 said:

6. Out of all the Canuck prospects who have a chance of turning pro next season, and possibly playing for the Moose next year, who are you most excited about? Brett - Winnipeg, MB  
I think it's difficult to narrow it down to one player because sometimes expectations exceed development. I think next year, the Canucks have a good crop of young players coming in, probably the biggest and the brightest that they've had in their time here, but we've had success. Guys have developed: Nathan McIver's developed, Mike Brown's developed, Jannik Hansen's developed. It's up to them to a certain point. They have some decent guys coming next year: Mason Raymond, the kid that plays in Brandon (Simak), maybe Luc Bourdon, Daniel Rahimi, who we might possibly see at the end of the year. I think they have a good crop of prospects, but there's not one guy in particular. They have Corey Schneider coming in from Boston College, which is a high-profile prospect. But I think you've got to be careful not to put too much expectations and see where guys play out.  

Interesting answers, he is expecting Raymond and Schneider to turn pro next year.............


who are you talking about?.

I highly doubt both of them will turn Pro next year. Although, I do think Raymond will leave school early....


Moose GM


The Moose GM said that....... when?

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1181 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 11:43 AM

itzabreeze said:

toxic rd said:

itzabreeze said:

Mike27 said:

6. Out of all the Canuck prospects who have a chance of turning pro next season, and possibly playing for the Moose next year, who are you most excited about? Brett - Winnipeg, MB  
I think it's difficult to narrow it down to one player because sometimes expectations exceed development. I think next year, the Canucks have a good crop of young players coming in, probably the biggest and the brightest that they've had in their time here, but we've had success. Guys have developed: Nathan McIver's developed, Mike Brown's developed, Jannik Hansen's developed. It's up to them to a certain point. They have some decent guys coming next year: Mason Raymond, the kid that plays in Brandon (Simak), maybe Luc Bourdon, Daniel Rahimi, who we might possibly see at the end of the year. I think they have a good crop of prospects, but there's not one guy in particular. They have Corey Schneider coming in from Boston College, which is a high-profile prospect. But I think you've got to be careful not to put too much expectations and see where guys play out.  

Interesting answers, he is expecting Raymond and Schneider to turn pro next year.............


who are you talking about?.

I highly doubt both of them will turn Pro next year. Although, I do think Raymond will leave school early....


Moose GM


The Moose GM said that....... when?


The moose gm said that whole thing. It was ask-a-moose with Craig Heisinger
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1182 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 12:14 PM

New Avatar :lol: :lol: :lol:

I also have a Grabby one, and more to come, including a Luc Bourdon 1 for Breeze
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1183 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 01:35 PM

MASON RAYMOND TURNING PRO

RAYMONG WILL FORGO HIS LAST 2 YEARS OF COLLEGE EILIGIBILITY AND BEGIN SKATING WITH THE MANITOBA MOOSE AS EARLY AS SUNDAY
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1184 User is offline   Winger Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: 19-January 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:15 PM

toxic rd said:

MASON RAYMOND TURNING PRO

RAYMONG WILL FORGO HIS LAST 2 YEARS OF COLLEGE EILIGIBILITY AND BEGIN SKATING WITH THE MANITOBA MOOSE AS EARLY AS SUNDAY


he's not finishing the semester or has it already ended?
0

#1185 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:16 PM

CSteele said:

toxic rd said:

MASON RAYMOND TURNING PRO

RAYMONG WILL FORGO HIS LAST 2 YEARS OF COLLEGE EILIGIBILITY AND BEGIN SKATING WITH THE MANITOBA MOOSE AS EARLY AS SUNDAY


he's not finishing the semester or has it already ended?


Hes' not finishing
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1186 User is offline   Winger Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: 19-January 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:17 PM

kind of odd
0

#1187 User is offline   Cooke_Hart Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,763
  • Joined: 08-July 03

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:18 PM

I see you're excited.

How old is Koltsov? I found it strange that he wasn't included in the Hockey News future watch.

Speaking of that mag it would probably make more sense to publish post trade deadline with the updates in it. i.e. Nillson and O'Marra in Edmonton as opposed to NY Islanders.

Also: In their reflection on their past rankings of 5 years ago (02') and 10 years ago (97') they were laughably bad. Just goes to show you how much a guessing game this whole prospect thing is.

Canucks
Tottenham
San Fran 49ers
---------------------------
Glutton For Punishment
0

#1188 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:19 PM

CSteele said:

kind of odd


Not really, Grabner could begin his pro hockey career once the Chiefs are bounced and Mason is 2 years older
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1189 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:19 PM

RAYMOND IS COMING!!!!

RAYMOND IS COMING!!!!

RAYMOND IS COMIGN!!!!!!!
Posted Image
0

#1190 User is offline   Winger Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 744
  • Joined: 19-January 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 02:20 PM

Cooke_Hart said:

I see you're excited.

How old is Koltsov? I found it strange that he wasn't included in the Hockey News future watch.  

Speaking of that mag it would probably make more sense to publish post trade deadline with the updates in it. i.e. Nillson and O'Marra in Edmonton as opposed to NY Islanders.

Also: In their reflection on their past rankings of 5 years ago (02') and 10 years ago (97') they were laughably bad. Just goes to show you how much a guessing game this whole prospect thing is.


in the next issue they have a segment on the prospects who were traded
0
  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.

Contact Us | Map & Parking | Sponsorship | Employment Opportunities | General Motors Place | Ownership | Privacy Policy | NHL.com Terms of Use