Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1221 User is offline   Rough Neck Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,225
  • Joined: 03-September 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 04:44 PM

Dortmund said:

Insidecollegehockey.com reports Raymond did sign with the Canucks.



He didn't sign with the Canucks. He signed with Manitoba, but we still own his rights. I think.
QUOTE (jaywins16 @ Dec 18 2008, 03:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow Brilliant comeback, why not just copy and paste what I write!

And no you are lost, if you dont like this topic dont come in here and waste your time!

QUOTE (Lost Canuck @ Dec 18 2008, 03:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow Brilliant comeback, why not just copy and paste what I write!

And no you are lost, if you dont like this topic dont come in here and waste your time!

R.I.P. Luc Bourdon

0

#1222 User is offline   CCF4E Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 04:45 PM

mball said:

CCF4E said:

But he may be on PTO or ATO with the Manitoba Moose and just left early


Correct me if I'm wrong but if Raymond signed with the Canucks why would he sign an ATO with the Moose?
But he didnt sign with the Canucks.......yet

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1223 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 04:51 PM

Rough Neck said:

Dortmund said:

Insidecollegehockey.com reports Raymond did sign with the Canucks.



He didn't sign with the Canucks. He signed with Manitoba, but we still own his rights. I think.


If you read the paragraph at the top it states:

Quote

Players who have signed with an American Hockey League team have agreed to an amateur tryout contract. An ATO allows an AHL team to sign a college player whose season is over after the league's trade deadline.


And since Raymonds signing is listed under the NHL section and not the AHL section I am assuming he signed with the Canucks and not the Moose. So from what I read on insidecollegehockey.com Raymond has a Canucks contract, not an ATO.
0

#1224 User is offline   The Internet Killer Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34
  • Joined: 25-December 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 04:56 PM

On a different note.

82 pages in 1 month ( 4weeks ).

Congrats to toxic rd for a great job. :D :D :D








Only 118 pages till the next Fatal Error :roll: :roll: :roll:
Hindsight is an exact science.
0

#1225 User is offline   __xxccnineteen Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Joined: 15-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 04:57 PM

mball said:

Rough Neck said:

Dortmund said:

Insidecollegehockey.com reports Raymond did sign with the Canucks.



He didn't sign with the Canucks. He signed with Manitoba, but we still own his rights. I think.


If you read the paragraph at the top it states:

Quote

Players who have signed with an American Hockey League team have agreed to an amateur tryout contract. An ATO allows an AHL team to sign a college player whose season is over after the league's trade deadline.


And since Raymonds signing is listed under the NHL section and not the AHL section I am assuming he signed with the Canucks and not the Moose. So from what I read on insidecollegehockey.com Raymond has a Canucks contract, not an ATO.



YAHHHH

^me on the sig.
... VISIT MY WEBSITE AT...
[[THIS LINK]].
for more sigs walls logos' etc!
0

#1226 User is online   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 05:19 PM

FLAHERTY GOT INJURED !!!

YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ELLIS SHOULD BE CALLED UP !!!

YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

VINCENT SHOULD BE ACTIVATED !!!

WAHOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1227 User is offline   CCF4E Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 05:25 PM

toxic rd said:

FLAHERTY GOT INJURED !!!

YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ELLIS SHOULD BE CALLED UP !!!

YAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

VINCENT SHOULD BE ACTIVATED !!!

WAHOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#1228 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 05:27 PM

Gnickers87 said:

Rough Neck said:

1 - Bourdon
2 - Raymond  
4 - Vincent  
5 - Butcher
6 - Fredhiem  
7 - Bliznak  

that was 05 for Canucks.


not a bad year, all those players could one day be NHL'ers. Bourdon and Raymond are the locks. Bliznak and Butcher would be 3rd-4th line energy players. Vincent will be hard pressed to make it here with all of our goalies. He could be an NHL backup though. Fredheim could be a 5th-6th defensemen


It would be fun to have Bliznak play for Vancouver. From Giants to Canucks (and probably some Moose/Salmon Kings in-between).

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1229 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 06:40 PM

Question about Raymond contract. Is it a two way?. Say the Canuck want to give Nazzy or **Insert top 6 forward here**.... say the last one ot two games of the year, if they are locked to win the Divison. Could the Nucks call up Raymond, or is he only on a one-way deal?

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1230 User is offline   Cooke_Hart Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,763
  • Joined: 08-July 03

Posted 16 March 2007 - 06:43 PM

Bliznak has a bad case of sucking though.

Canucks
Tottenham
San Fran 49ers
---------------------------
Glutton For Punishment
0

#1231 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 06:46 PM

itzabreeze said:

Question about Raymond contract. Is it a two way?. Say the Canuck want to give Nazzy or **Insert top 6 forward here**.... say the last one ot two games of the year, if they are locked to win the Divison. Could the Nucks call up Raymond, or is he only on a one-way deal?


I'm sure it is a two-way contract. It would only make sense.
0

#1232 User is online   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 06:52 PM

Before anyone freaks, Simek is out of the lineup with a day-to-day ankle injury
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1233 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 08:24 PM

Cooke_Hart said:

Bliznak has a bad case of sucking though.


QFT

Too many homers think he can actaully make the NHL.
Posted Image
0

#1234 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 08:32 PM

mball said:

itzabreeze said:

Question about Raymond contract. Is it a two way?. Say the Canuck want to give Nazzy or **Insert top 6 forward here**.... say the last one ot two games of the year, if they are locked to win the Divison. Could the Nucks call up Raymond, or is he only on a one-way deal?


I'm sure it is a two-way contract. It would only make sense.


I'm pretty sure that all entry level contracts are two way.
Posted Image
0

#1235 User is offline   jayRmichigan Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,632
  • Joined: 24-January 04

Posted 16 March 2007 - 09:21 PM

timw33 said:

mball said:

itzabreeze said:

Question about Raymond contract. Is it a two way?. Say the Canuck want to give Nazzy or **Insert top 6 forward here**.... say the last one ot two games of the year, if they are locked to win the Divison. Could the Nucks call up Raymond, or is he only on a one-way deal?


I'm sure it is a two-way contract. It would only make sense.


I'm pretty sure that all entry level contracts are two way.


Doesn't really matter anyways, because a one way contract just means that you get paid a set amount no matter what league you're playing in. I think he meant if Raymond's contract is with the Moose or the Canucks.

QUOTE (Dominator_Hasek @ Apr 12 2009, 07:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I just love abortion!
0

#1236 User is online   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 09:33 PM

BC wins 6-2. Schneider now goes into the Hockey East finals. And is prolly a god in Boston for knocking off BU
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1237 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 09:40 PM

toxic rd said:

BC wins 6-2. Schneider now goes into the Hockey East finals. And is prolly a god in Boston for knocking off BU


Awesome!

So if they win The HE finals, they go into the Frozen Four?
Posted Image
0

#1238 User is online   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 09:42 PM

timw33 said:

toxic rd said:

BC wins 6-2. Schneider now goes into the Hockey East finals. And is prolly a god in Boston for knocking off BU


Awesome!

So if they win The HE finals, they go into the Frozen Four?


Believe so, but theres 4 conferences so i dunno how it works, some clarify it for me
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1239 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 16 March 2007 - 10:12 PM

toxic rd said:

timw33 said:

toxic rd said:

BC wins 6-2. Schneider now goes into the Hockey East finals. And is prolly a god in Boston for knocking off BU


Awesome!

So if they win The HE finals, they go into the Frozen Four?


Believe so, but theres 4 conferences so i dunno how it works, some clarify it for me


I think this is how it works. Winner's of four regional playoffs go on to the Frozen Four. One team from each conference (East,West,Midwest,Northeast). So like you said if BC wins the East Finals they go to Frozen Four.
0

#1240 User is offline   Grabner Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,745
  • Joined: 18-August 06

Posted 16 March 2007 - 10:34 PM

toxic rd said:

Hrmmmmmmmmmm, who should get the Grabby Avatar, i was planning on giving it to Grabner, considering his bloody username is named after him


PICke MEee!! pikKEE mEE e Picke Mewewe!!111



...Raymond is comming. YES :!: :twisted:
0

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.