Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1941 User is offline   Rough Neck Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,283
  • Joined: 03-September 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:55 PM

timw33 said:

Canucks92 said:

Just a quick quest, when you sign a player to a contract but he doesnt play for the team on a regualr basis, does it go against the cap or does the organization pay for it?


Example please.


Fitzpatrick, Edler, Chouinard

I think we still pay, because, Chouinard has been scratched and is playing in the minors but we still are playing him 1.1 mil.
QUOTE (jaywins16 @ Dec 18 2008, 03:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow Brilliant comeback, why not just copy and paste what I write!

And no you are lost, if you dont like this topic dont come in here and waste your time!

QUOTE (Lost Canuck @ Dec 18 2008, 03:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow Brilliant comeback, why not just copy and paste what I write!

And no you are lost, if you dont like this topic dont come in here and waste your time!

R.I.P. Luc Bourdon

0

#1942 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:58 PM

Rough Neck said:

timw33 said:

Canucks92 said:

Just a quick quest, when you sign a player to a contract but he doesnt play for the team on a regualr basis, does it go against the cap or does the organization pay for it?


Example please.


Fitzpatrick, Edler, Chouinard

I think we still pay, because, Chouinard has been scratched and is playing in the minors but we still are playing him 1.1 mil.


Yeah, because Chewy is on a 1 way, it does not count against the cap but the team still pays him 1.1M.

Fitzpatrick gets all of his 525K because he is on a 1 way.

Edler gets paid PER game and counts against the cap PER game.

So if he plays only a quarter of the season, he gets 1/4 of his 550K salary and that same amount counts against the cap.



Can someone start posting those Koltsov amazing goals, assists movies in the Koltsov/Krajicek threads and the defence for next year threads.
Posted Image
0

#1943 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,311
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:26 PM

Yay, Simek with a goal to put the Wheaties up 2-0 in the 2nd period of play
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1944 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:30 PM

toxic rd said:

Yay, Simek with a goal to put the Wheaties up 2-0 in the 2nd period of play


Awesome.

Hiroshima probably has a hard-on right now.
Posted Image
0

#1945 User is offline   leo2892 Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,583
  • Joined: 05-April 04

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:37 PM

Let Green, Bulis, Santala, Smolinski, etc. etc. walk.

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Kesler-Prospect
Cooke-Morrison-Cowan/Linden
Burrows-Rypien-Cowan/Linden

Looks like there's room for only one prospect to crack the roster next season. :(
Proud Cody Hodgson fan since 2007.


Mike Keane is my hero.
0

#1946 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,311
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:39 PM

leo2892 said:

Let Green, Bulis, Santala, Smolinski, etc. etc. walk.

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Kesler-Prospect
Cooke-Morrison-Cowan/Linden
Burrows-Rypien-Cowan/Linden

Looks like there's room for only one prospect to crack the roster next season.  :(


Not if Linden retires and Pyatt asks for too much
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1947 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:43 PM

leo2892 said:

Let Green, Bulis, Santala, Smolinski, etc. etc. walk.

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Kesler-Prospect
Cooke-Morrison-Cowan/Linden
Burrows-Rypien-Cowan/Linden

Looks like there's room for only one prospect to crack the roster next season.  :(


I think we should put Kesler back on RW.

Need a decent centre for that line.
Posted Image
0

#1948 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,311
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 07:59 PM

Simek 1g 1a so far as Brandon is up 5-1
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1949 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 08:00 PM

toxic rd said:

Simek 1g 1a so far as Brandon is up 5-1


Nicely done Simek.
Posted Image
0

#1950 User is offline   Canadian Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,283
  • Joined: 09-May 03

Posted 29 March 2007 - 08:16 PM

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop
~~~IN LUONGO WE TRUST~~~
Posted Image
0

#1951 User is offline   Lambchops Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,730
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:22 PM

Canadian said:

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop
Koltsov is a defenceman

Creditz to lovekesler for my 'frick-frack'ian sig!
Backstrom-Dumont-Bergeron
Langkow-Plekanec-Rolston
Visnovsky-Spacek
Kuba-Babchuk
Huet
Vokoun
0

#1952 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:23 PM

Lambchops said:

Canadian said:

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop
Koltsov is a defenceman


He understands that.

He is suggesting maybe try this guy as a forward seeing as how we have a our top 6 almost set and Koltsov has great offensive insticts, speed, skill, passing, etc.
Posted Image
0

#1953 User is offline   lfergs Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,045
  • Joined: 24-July 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:54 PM

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.
0

#1954 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:57 PM

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


Too many prospects..

Keep Pyatt.
Hansen yeah.

Grabner AHL.
Posted Image
0

#1955 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:19 PM

timw33 said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


Too many prospects..

Keep Pyatt.
Hansen yeah.

Grabner AHL.


I for one would be very surprised if Hansen played as a regular next season. I would give him another year with the Moose with maybe a few call ups here and there before he steps in full time.

The only current prospects who may have a chance at getting some solid ice time in the NHL next season are Edler, Bourdon and maybe Raymond. Kolstov is now a longshot because of the Salo deal but he should be able to step in as a regular if that's what it came to. Either way don't expect a mob of prospects to lead the Canucks to the cup next season. Young guys will be eased in to the system as they become NHL ready.
0

#1956 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:21 PM

mb said:

timw33 said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


Too many prospects..

Keep Pyatt.
Hansen yeah.

Grabner AHL.


I for one would be very surprised if Hansen played as a regular next season. I would give him another year with the Moose with maybe a few call ups here and there before he steps in full time.

The only current prospects who may have a chance at getting some solid ice time in the NHL next season are Edler, Bourdon and maybe Raymond. Kolstov is now a longshot because of the Salo deal but he should be able to step in as a regular if that's what it came to. Either way don't expect a mob of prospects to lead the Canucks to the cup next season. Young guys will be eased in to the system as they become NHL ready.


Indeed.

I really want to see Koltsov on this team though.

I can see Hansen on the team next year, he was the absoloute FINAL cut last training camp.
Posted Image
0

#1957 User is offline   :Unknown Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,665
  • Joined: 21-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:33 PM

timw33 said:

Lambchops said:

Canadian said:

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop
Koltsov is a defenceman


He understands that.

He is suggesting maybe try this guy as a forward seeing as how we have a our top 6 almost set and Koltsov has great offensive insticts, speed, skill, passing, etc.


Call me crazy but I for one like that idea.

He is a smallish player with good offensive skills, sounds like a perfect new age forward to me.

QUOTE(sopelslidrox)
This forum is full of panic stricken bandwagoning Mental-midgets.
0

#1958 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,936
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:37 PM

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


How bout this

Sedin/Sedin/Pyatt
Nazzy/Kesler/Raymond
Cooke/Morisson/Cowan
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X

With the X i'd take Fitzpatrick. Very capable as the 7th D

Give Grabner a year in the AHL to develope his defensive game at a higher level. I'd like to see Hansen in the lineup, but I think it makes more sense to have Pyatt with the Sedins and Raymond would look really good on that 2nd line. Cowan has been solid. I see no reason not to re-sign him.
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#1959 User is offline   streifel15 Icon


  • Salmon Kings Star
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 73
  • Joined: 19-February 07

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:42 PM

Psycho_Path said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


How bout this

Sedin/Sedin/Pyatt
Nazzy/Kesler/Raymond
Cooke/Morisson/Cowan
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X

With the X i'd take Fitzpatrick. Very capable as the 7th D

Give Grabner a year in the AHL to develope his defensive game at a higher level. I'd like to see Hansen in the lineup, but I think it makes more sense to have Pyatt with the Sedins and Raymond would look really good on that 2nd line. Cowan has been solid. I see no reason not to re-sign him.


i like it
0

#1960 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:48 PM

Psycho_Path said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


How bout this

Sedin/Sedin/Pyatt
Nazzy/Kesler/Raymond
Cooke/Morisson/Cowan
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X

With the X i'd take Fitzpatrick. Very capable as the 7th D

Give Grabner a year in the AHL to develope his defensive game at a higher level. I'd like to see Hansen in the lineup, but I think it makes more sense to have Pyatt with the Sedins and Raymond would look really good on that 2nd line. Cowan has been solid. I see no reason not to re-sign him.


Where the hell is Bieksa??

Bourdon will be AHL.

Sopel WANTS to sign here.
Posted Image
0

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. MSN/Bing

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.