Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1961 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:55 PM

Psycho_Path said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


How bout this

Sedin/Sedin/Pyatt
Nazzy/Kesler/Raymond
Cooke/Morisson/Cowan
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X

With the X i'd take Fitzpatrick. Very capable as the 7th D

Give Grabner a year in the AHL to develope his defensive game at a higher level. I'd like to see Hansen in the lineup, but I think it makes more sense to have Pyatt with the Sedins and Raymond would look really good on that 2nd line. Cowan has been solid. I see no reason not to re-sign him.


Raymond will not be a Regular next season.

Try something like

D. Sedin (3.575) H.Sedin (3.575) Pyatt (1.1 million)
Nazzy (6) Mo (3.2) UFA???
Cooke (1.5) Kesler (1.3) Hansen (450)
Burrows (475) Linden (625) Cowan (475)


Bieksa (550) Mitchell (3.5)
Ohlund (3.5) Salo (3.5)
Edler (550) Krajicek (625)

7th D-man: 450,000

Luongo: (6.500)
Backup: Pylon (450,000)

Also, I doubt BOTH Bourdon AND Edler will be in the lineup as a regular. Bourdon may have a better camp then Edler (or Edler may have a better camp then then Bourdon.....) Thus, the "kid" who has the best camp will take the roster spot.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1962 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,937
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:56 PM

timw33 said:

Psycho_Path said:

lfergs said:

Sedin/Sedin/Hansen (has very good vision which th Sedins say they want).
Nazzy/Kesler/Grabner (I prefer Kes' on the wing, but ohwell)
Cooke/Morisson/Raymond
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Bourdon
Mitchell/Kraijeck
Salo/Edler
X
to me those top three lines look very good.


How bout this

Sedin/Sedin/Pyatt
Nazzy/Kesler/Raymond
Cooke/Morisson/Cowan
Burrows/Rypien/Linden

Ohlund/Koltsov
Mitchell/Bieksa
Salo/Edler
X

With the X i'd take Fitzpatrick. Very capable as the 7th D

Give Grabner a year in the AHL to develope his defensive game at a higher level. I'd like to see Hansen in the lineup, but I think it makes more sense to have Pyatt with the Sedins and Raymond would look really good on that 2nd line. Cowan has been solid. I see no reason not to re-sign him.


Where the hell is Bieksa??

Bourdon will be AHL.

Sopel WANTS to sign here.


Whoops. Didn't really look at the D. I'd use Bieksa instead of Bourdon. Give him a year in the AHL. Use for callups. My bad on that 1.

Trade Krajicek.
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#1963 User is offline   youneedhockey101 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,119
  • Joined: 08-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:02 AM

i thought raymond is a LW? is he?
Calgary Flames: If you want quality hockey, dont be a Flames fan
Post #1000 at Sun Oct 29 2006 11:15

To grammar lover: come back to this site when this site become a grammar site
0

#1964 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:02 AM

Psycho_Path said:

Whoops. Didn't really look at the D. I'd use Bieksa instead of Bourdon. Give him a year in the AHL. Use for callups. My bad on that 1.

Trade Krajicek.


So who would you want as the D pairing then?

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1965 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:03 AM

youneedhockey101 said:

i thought raymond is a LW?  is he?

Raymond played mostly LW. Although he can play RW and centre :twisted:

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#1966 User is offline   youneedhockey101 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,119
  • Joined: 08-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:19 AM

what i want is
Sedins Sedins Carter
Naslund Morrison Pyatt
Raymond Kesler (UFA player, Hansen or Grabner if he is ready)
Burrows Green Linden

and good to know that raymond is flexible on his position though!

The reason i have those lines is due to the recent signing of sami salo, carter will sure wants to come back and plays with the sedins. He probably would not demand much, so we can most likely afford him.

Pyatt is not going to make the same mistake like carter did, he will sign for a reasonable raise
Calgary Flames: If you want quality hockey, dont be a Flames fan
Post #1000 at Sun Oct 29 2006 11:15

To grammar lover: come back to this site when this site become a grammar site
0

#1967 User is offline   g_bassi13 Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,405
  • Joined: 11-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 12:23 AM

youneedhockey101 said:

what i want is
Sedins Sedins Carter
Naslund Morrison Pyatt
Raymond Kesler (UFA player, Hansen or Grabner if he is ready)
Burrows Green Linden

and good to know that raymond is flexible on his position though!

The reason i have those lines is due to the recent signing of sami salo, carter will sure wants to come back and plays with the sedins.  He probably would not demand much, so we can most likely afford him.

Pyatt is not going to make the same mistake like carter did, he will sign for a reasonable raise

A team without Cowan is hardly a team at all.
Posted Image
Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads.
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image
0

#1968 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:15 AM

Ellis = re-assigned to Victoria

He's gonna get a real chance to prove himself in the playoffs now
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1969 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,253
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:17 AM

toxic rd said:

Ellis = re-assigned to Victoria

He's gonna get a real chance to prove himself in the playoffs now



Poor poor Vincent, I wonder what they'll do with him. Bridges is a local boy and if Schneider turns pro......bye bye I would assume.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1970 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:19 AM

Dortmund said:

toxic rd said:

Ellis = re-assigned to Victoria

He's gonna get a real chance to prove himself in the playoffs now



Poor poor Vincent, I wonder what they'll do with him. Bridges is a local boy and if Schneider turns pro......bye bye I would assume.


Manitoba will prolly dump Groumet-Morris if Schneider turns pro, so Schneider will play for the Moose

Vincent will either get plenty of R&R or loaned to some other ECHL team that needs him
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1971 User is offline   platinum_edge Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 100
  • Joined: 12-March 07

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:26 AM

Anybody that has Hansen on the top 2 lines for next year hasn't watched him play. I've seen pleanty of Moose games this year, and this kid is not ready to play big time minutes in the big leagues. He's capable, he's good, he shows time where he looks like he can be great but he really isn't ready.

If he gets 3rd or 4th line minutes playing with Linden I'd be happy. I don't want a spot with the Sedins wasted on a developing prospect where they need a cup before Luongos contract ends.

I can see both Raymond and Hansen playing 3rd or 4th line, while Edler will fill out our defence.
0

#1972 User is offline   youneedhockey101 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,119
  • Joined: 08-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:57 AM

g_bassi13 said:

youneedhockey101 said:

what i want is
Sedins Sedins Carter
Naslund Morrison Pyatt
Raymond Kesler (UFA player, Hansen or Grabner if he is ready)
Burrows Green Linden

and good to know that raymond is flexible on his position though!

The reason i have those lines is due to the recent signing of sami salo, carter will sure wants to come back and plays with the sedins.  He probably would not demand much, so we can most likely afford him.

Pyatt is not going to make the same mistake like carter did, he will sign for a reasonable raise

A team without Cowan is hardly a team at all.


Sedins Sedins Carter
Naslund Morrison Pyatt
Raymond Kesler (UFA player, Hansen or Grabner if he is ready)
Burrows Linden Cowan

How about this fourth line instead?
Calgary Flames: If you want quality hockey, dont be a Flames fan
Post #1000 at Sun Oct 29 2006 11:15

To grammar lover: come back to this site when this site become a grammar site
0

#1973 User is offline   The Internet Killer Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34
  • Joined: 25-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 10:42 AM

Canadian said:

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop


I like the idea of trying Koltsov on the wing, but he would have to spend sometime in the AHL to learn the position and that could be a problem.

Linden may or may not retire and that could take some teaking.

Maybe trade Krajicek for a high pick or an upgrade winger/center.

And make the #6 defence spot a dedicated training spot ,ie. Bourdon comes up for 5 games and then returns to the Moose and is replaced by Edler for 5games who then returns to the Moose and is replaced by Rahimi for 5 games (if he is close to ready for the NHL) then back to Bourdon for 5 games, etc.

This allows the defensive prospects to get the ice time they need in the AHL and to learn the speed of the NHL.

Just a few thoughts.
Hindsight is an exact science.
0

#1974 User is offline   Millerdraft Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,938
  • Joined: 02-March 04

Posted 30 March 2007 - 01:10 PM

platinum_edge said:

Anybody that has Hansen on the top 2 lines for next year hasn't watched him play. I've seen pleanty of Moose games this year, and this kid is not ready to play big time minutes in the big leagues. He's capable, he's good, he shows time where he looks like he can be great but he really isn't ready.

If he gets 3rd or 4th line minutes playing with Linden I'd be happy. I don't want a spot with the Sedins wasted on a developing prospect where they need a cup before Luongos contract ends.  

I can see both Raymond and Hansen playing 3rd or 4th line, while Edler will fill out our defence.


I wanna see Raymond and Hansen play on a line together for the rest of this year/playoffs and a quarter to a half of next year. At that point I'd call the both of 'em up together and put 'em on a line with Kesler. That'd work well as Kesler and Hansen had somethin' goin' last preseason.
QUOTE (Tripwyre)
Can't spell Kesler without Selke.

QUOTE (VictorHedman @ Aug 23 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Slapyourself if you think Kesler will score 25+ goals, he just doesn't have the offensive skill.
0

#1975 User is offline   vincetheprince Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 407
  • Joined: 12-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 01:17 PM

The Internet Killer said:

Maybe trade Krajicek for a high pick or an upgrade winger/center.


Deadline is over but I think a 4th is the most we would get for him.

Next year's lines

Sedin Sedin Pyatt
Naslund UFA(Gomez hehe) Raymond or Hansen
Cooke Morrison Linden
Burrows Kesler Cowan

Ohlund-Koltsov
Bieksa-Mitchell
Salo-Edler
Krajicek

Luongo
Cheap Backup(or MaCintyre)

Grabner Simek(Maybe another year in the WHL) and Raymond or Hansen(which ever one doesnt crack the canucks roster) Bourdon Schneider Rahimi all go to Moose
EDIT:Where does Sopel go? I say we dont sign him
0

#1976 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,937
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 01:33 PM

vincetheprince said:

The Internet Killer said:

Maybe trade Krajicek for a high pick or an upgrade winger/center.


Deadline is over but I think a 4th is the most we would get for him.

Next year's lines

Sedin Sedin Pyatt
Naslund UFA(Gomez hehe) Raymond or Hansen
Cooke Morrison Linden
Burrows Kesler Cowan

Ohlund-Koltsov
Bieksa-Mitchell
Salo-Edler
Krajicek

Luongo
Cheap Backup(or MaCintyre)

Grabner Simek(Maybe another year in the WHL) and Raymond or Hansen(which ever one doesnt crack the canucks roster) Bourdon Schneider Rahimi all go to Moose
EDIT:Where does Sopel go? I say we dont sign him


I actually like this idea kinda better than the one i posted for forwards
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#1977 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,937
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 01:34 PM

itzabreeze said:

Psycho_Path said:

Whoops. Didn't really look at the D. I'd use Bieksa instead of Bourdon. Give him a year in the AHL. Use for callups. My bad on that 1.

Trade Krajicek.


So who would you want as the D pairing then?


I'd changed it in my post (though i suppose i should have bolded the change)
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#1978 User is offline   The Internet Killer Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 34
  • Joined: 25-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 02:43 PM

vincetheprince said:

The Internet Killer said:

Maybe trade Krajicek for a high pick or an upgrade winger/center.


Deadline is over


Wow I missed that !!!!!!!!!!!!

And Bourdon is playing in jr. and hopfully head to a few games in Vancouver in a thing called the memorial cup. So unavalible.

Koltsov is a playoff race in the RSL. Also unavalibe

And Kesler is injured. Again unavalible.

Now read this very carefully!!! The thread is prospects and the talk was about next years lines.

So I have to ask.

Have you been eating to many jelly beans out of your jar ????
Hindsight is an exact science.
0

#1979 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,253
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 03:08 PM

To make Toxic's life easier here is a little playoff update for all that don't want to go through pages to find out


Simek

GP 2 G 1 A 1 +1 Brandon is up 3-1


Fuller

GP 4 G 1 A 4 +4 Prince George won 4-0

Grabner

GP 4 G 0 A 1 Even Spokane tied 2-2

Bliznak

GP 4 G 1 A 2 +2 Vancouver up 3-1


Bourdon


GP 4 G 0 A 3 +3 Cape won 4-0 most of Cape Breton's goals were scored on the Powerplay so his +3 doesn't do him justice as his partner is +3 but other Dmen are -1 on the team.




Russian Prospects were updated 2 pages back. So that's your junior report.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1980 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 04:26 PM

The Internet Killer said:

Canadian said:

I'd like to see:

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Cooke-Mo-Koltsov
Naslund-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Cowan/Linden-Linden/Cowan
Rypien

Ohlund-Sopel
Mitchell-Bieksa
Krajicek-Salo
Tremblay

Try Koltsov as a winger (speed, offensive, etc)
Have Edler and Bourdon on the Moose to develop


I like the idea of trying Koltsov on the wing, but he would have to spend sometime in the AHL to learn the position and that could be a problem.

Linden may or may not retire and that could take some teaking.

Maybe trade Krajicek for a high pick or an upgrade winger/center.

And make the #6 defence spot a dedicated training spot ,ie. Bourdon comes up for 5 games and then returns to the Moose and is replaced by Edler for 5games who then returns to the Moose and is replaced by Rahimi for 5 games (if he is close to ready for the NHL) then back to Bourdon for 5 games, etc.

This allows the defensive prospects to get the ice time they need in the AHL and to learn the speed of the NHL.

Just a few thoughts.


Koltsov will never come here unless he has a one way deal.

He will not accept playing in the AHL.
Posted Image
0

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.