Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#1981 User is offline   AmazingNuck Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,991
  • Joined: 27-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 04:31 PM

What about Rahimi? Is there any chance he could make the Canucks or the Moose next year?
Henrik, without Daniel, stat track: 9gp 3g 7a 1 6PIM
0

#1982 User is offline   Grabner Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,745
  • Joined: 18-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:11 PM

AmazingNuck said:

What about Rahimi? Is there any chance he could make the Canucks or the Moose next year?


He will be for sure on the Moose next season, he might come over this season after his playoffs are over.
0

#1983 User is offline   VaNuCkZ Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,110
  • Joined: 03-March 07

Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:18 PM

Would you guys trade up in the Draft by trading Naslund if he waives his NTC?
0

#1984 User is offline   Grabner Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,745
  • Joined: 18-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:19 PM

Canucks92 said:

Would you guys trade up in the Draft by trading Naslund if he waives his NTC?


How?
Where?
Why?
When?
Who?
0

#1985 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:46 PM

Canucks92 said:

Would you guys trade up in the Draft by trading Naslund if he waives his NTC?


In this draft???

Are you nuts???

And Naslund WILL play his final season, then we will go from there.
Posted Image
0

#1986 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 05:59 PM

My thoughts

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Morrison-Raymond/UFA
Cooke-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Linden-Cowan/Green

Ohlund-Koltsov
Bieksa-Salo
Krajicek-Mitchell
Fitzhatrick/Edler as 7th

Luongo
Sabby/Mac

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1987 User is offline   Alexander Ovechkin Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,087
  • Joined: 21-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:03 PM

The Imposter said:

My thoughts

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Morrison-Raymond/UFA
Cooke-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Linden-Cowan/Green

Ohlund-Koltsov
Bieksa-Salo
Krajicek-Mitchell
Fitzhatrick/Edler as 7th

Luongo
Sabby/Mac


I like. But the defence doesn't really change.
0

#1988 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:05 PM

We should try to cut down on the number of lineup projections in the Prospect thread.

Save it for other threads.
Posted Image
0

#1989 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:08 PM

Alexander Ovechkin said:

The Imposter said:

My thoughts

Sedin-Sedin-Pyatt
Naslund-Morrison-Raymond/UFA
Cooke-Kesler-Hansen
Burrows-Linden-Cowan/Green

Ohlund-Koltsov
Bieksa-Salo
Krajicek-Mitchell
Fitzhatrick/Edler as 7th

Luongo
Sabby/Mac


I like. But the defence doesn't really change.


Well Bourdon should spend time in the AHL. Edler could probably be the 6th but I still think Krajicek is good. Our D have worked very well throughout the season. Koltsov should provide some more offense. Fitzhatrick's decent defensively, much better than Tremblay.

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#1990 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:10 PM

Yes, Lineup projections are not needed here
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1991 User is offline   thecupismine Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,360
  • Joined: 27-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:12 PM

toxic rd said:

Yes, Lineup projections are not needed here


Agreed, I want to read more talk about prospect performance, not what the entire Canucks lineup is going to look like next year!


Vancouver Canucks GM in CDC Fantasy Playoff Pool

Kostitsyn-Backstrom-Koivu-Franzen
Pronger-Lidstrom-Backman
Huet
0

#1992 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:13 PM

thecupismine said:

toxic rd said:

Yes, Lineup projections are not needed here


Agreed, I want to read more talk about prospect performance, not what the entire Canucks lineup is going to look like next year!


100% Agree
Posted Image
0

#1993 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 07:43 PM

Spokane game has just started.
Posted Image
0

#1994 User is offline   :Unknown Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,665
  • Joined: 21-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:09 PM

timw33 said:

Spokane game has just started.


Go Grabner . . .

Score some Goalz! 8) .

QUOTE(sopelslidrox)
This forum is full of panic stricken bandwagoning Mental-midgets.
0

#1995 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:17 PM

Bliznak with an assist.

Spokane down 1-0, outshot 12-4 in the 1st.
Posted Image
0

#1996 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:44 PM

timw33 said:

Bliznak with an assist.

Spokane down 1-0, outshot 12-4 in the 1st.



Spokane down 4-0, 15-4


Grabner still injured? He hasn't gone this many games without seeing the scoring sheet all season.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#1997 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:54 PM

Bliznak just got his 2nd assist of the night

Playing with Mhacek and McArdle, a very good line
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#1998 User is offline   youneedhockey101 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,119
  • Joined: 08-June 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:58 PM

Dortmund said:

timw33 said:

Bliznak with an assist.

Spokane down 1-0, outshot 12-4 in the 1st.



Spokane down 4-0, 15-4


Grabner still injured? He hasn't gone this many games without seeing the scoring sheet all season.


doh!

Come on, Grabner!
Calgary Flames: If you want quality hockey, dont be a Flames fan
Post #1000 at Sun Oct 29 2006 11:15

To grammar lover: come back to this site when this site become a grammar site
0

#1999 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:59 PM

Dortmund said:

timw33 said:

Bliznak with an assist.

Spokane down 1-0, outshot 12-4 in the 1st.



Spokane down 4-0, 15-4


Grabner still injured? He hasn't gone this many games without seeing the scoring sheet all season.


I had a thought a few pages back about questioning if Grabs is in fact injured. Remember, before the playoffs started he was out the last 5 games with the "flu". I had a thought that it could have been a "cover up" as he may have had in fact had a injury.

Do I think he actally has one?. No. A couple of people suggest Grabner has "given up", or just wants to turn Pro and say the hell with junior. Maybe he and the Canucks have a deal for him to join the Moose after his season is over, I don't know. But whatever the case, his play for a #1 draft pick and one of the so called "best players in the whl" as been extremely alarming.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#2000 User is offline   chiefs20167 Icon


  • Salmon Kings Star
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 56
  • Joined: 26-December 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 09:11 PM

Grabner isn't injured, just non exisitant this series. Granted Everett (Irving in particular) has his number but wow. With the occasional hits he makes it's like he's not even dressed for the games.

This being Game 5 tonight, I seriously doubt that he'll get things going before the series is over. That's too bad.

If it is a case of wanting to turn Pro and throw away the WHL it really doesn't look good. If it's just a slump, will he even be able to get out of it with the Moose (or Canucks)? I don't know.
0

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.