[Winger]

ok

[Toxic]

3-1 Evt

[timw33]

toxic rd said:

3-1 Evt

Its over.

And I've got such a huge radio delay.... :evil:

[Dortmund]

Didn't Schneider play today? i must have missed the post

[Winger]

Dortmund said:

Didn't Schneider play today? i must have missed the post

dont think so

[itzabreeze]

Chiefs done.......


Yawn.

[Toxic]

4-1

[Dortmund]

Nevermind...I mis-read something on insidecollegehockey.com. It's on Thurs with the Finals on Sat. My bad....I'll go hang my head in shame.

[timw33]

itzabreeze said:

Chiefs done.......


Yawn.

Yeah, well lets make some space for Grabner on the Moose now.

[crazed_canucklehead]

toxic rd said:

You want me to describe me? Ok, i'm a elitist. I've said it before and i'll say it again, i'm a highly intellectual, self-centered guy who sees EVERYTHING in life from a different and unique point of view as compared to you, the norms of the world.

Dude, calling yourself intellectual is probably one of the most arrogant things you can do. It's okay to be motivated and antisocial, but don't think that you can patronize people and sincerely believe that you are smarter than them just because you know something they don't. This paragraph is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.

BTW, you said how you have to have thick skin to do what you do. What, does making a popular thread in an internet forum classify you as a genius? Buddy, isn't this thread supposed to have questions about the topic anyway? Give your head a shake.

[Vancouver_Canucks]

Grabner only have 1 assist in the series? Minus player aswell?

If so thats pretty damn pathetic.

[Dortmund]

timw33 said:

itzabreeze said:

Chiefs done.......


Yawn.

Yeah, well lets make some space for Grabner on the Moose now.

I don't think he'll go to the Moose. They already have 4 healthy bodies in the pressbox, with already personnel issues. If he does go anywhere it could be with the Salmon Kings in the playoffs. If the Moose weren't so good this year I'd say he'd be there but I think Raymond took his spot.

[timw33]

Vancouver_Canucks said:

Grabner only have 1 assist in the series?  Minus player aswell?

If so thats pretty damn pathetic.

Everett did check him tight, but thats not an excuse.

But now we get the kid playing against men now.

[Toxic]

crazed_canucklehead said:

toxic rd said:

You want me to describe me? Ok, i'm a elitist. I've said it before and i'll say it again, i'm a highly intellectual, self-centered guy who sees EVERYTHING in life from a different and unique point of view as compared to you, the norms of the world.

Dude, calling yourself intellectual is probably one of the most arrogant things you can do. It's okay to be motivated and antisocial, but don't think that you can patronize people and sincerely believe that you are smarter than them just because you know something they don't. This paragraph is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Well yes, if you take it;s connotation and not the ACTUAL meaning:

"An intellectual is a person who uses his or her intellect to work, study, reflect, speculate on, or ask and answer questions with regard to a variety of different ideas"

You really didnt need to post that, if you read the restof what i wrote you know that means nothing to me, and i never said i know more, i said i see things from a different point of view. Like you, you saw what i wrote in the normal sense, which is to explode and insult someone rather than rationally thinking through it, so thanks for making my point

[Dortmund]

Vancouver_Canucks said:

Grabner only have 1 assist in the series?  Minus player aswell?

If so thats pretty damn pathetic.

The series was like Chilliwack playing Vancouver. I'm surprised Spokane won games. Everett made Vancouver look average all year long. This team is by far the best team in the WHL. It's a little disappointing but it's not like Grabner's team was the favourite. Then I'd be pissed.

[-mb]

So does anybody have an idea of the whole ATO/Clear day roster thing? Also just a side note hear but Moose fans weren't too happy about Raymond coming to the Moose. It turned out pretty good for the Moose as Raymond has been having success with the team but there's only so much room on the Moose for Canucks prospects this season.

[Vancouver_Canucks]

timw33 said:

Vancouver_Canucks said:

Grabner only have 1 assist in the series?  Minus player aswell?

If so thats pretty damn pathetic.

Everett did check him tight, but thats not an excuse.

But now we get the kid playing against men now.

If he can't even rack up points against boys what makes him look promising playing against men?

We got the ******* Pavel Datysuk of the WHL as our prospect?

**** I hope we find out he was playing sick or injured.

[Vancouver_Canucks]

Dortmund said:

Vancouver_Canucks said:

Grabner only have 1 assist in the series?  Minus player aswell?

If so thats pretty damn pathetic.

The series was like Chilliwack playing Vancouver. I'm surprised Spokane won games. Everett made Vancouver look average all year long. This team is by far the best team in the WHL. It's a little disappointing but it's not like Grabner's team was the favourite. Then I'd be pissed.

Well shouldn't Grabner be dynamic enough to dominate the game by himself with his speed and talent? I mean if he is a 1st round draft pick and touted pretty highly with this organization then you should hope he shows some offensive stretches of brilliance.

Yes his team would suck but that doesn't mean Grabner would have to suck.

[Blister Soul]

Nice article about Shirokov. I'm really hoping he comes over next year, more so than Koltsov now that we have Salo signed.

[crazed_canucklehead]

toxic rd said:

crazed_canucklehead said:

toxic rd said:

You want me to describe me? Ok, i'm a elitist. I've said it before and i'll say it again, i'm a highly intellectual, self-centered guy who sees EVERYTHING in life from a different and unique point of view as compared to you, the norms of the world.

Dude, calling yourself intellectual is probably one of the most arrogant things you can do. It's okay to be motivated and antisocial, but don't think that you can patronize people and sincerely believe that you are smarter than them just because you know something they don't. This paragraph is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Well yes, if you take it;s connotation and not the ACTUAL meaning:

"An intellectual is a person who uses his or her intellect to work, study, reflect, speculate on, or ask and answer questions with regard to a variety of different ideas"

You really didnt need to post that, if you read the restof what i wrote you know that means nothing to me, and i never said i know more, i said i see things from a different point of view. Like you, you saw what i wrote in the normal sense, which is to explode and insult someone rather than rationally thinking through it, so thanks you making my point

No, it's not that I myself am angry at you. It's just that I think it's gutless to shun people who ask questions about something that you know. And it hasn't been just one time. It seems to me like as the year has progressed, you continue to think that people don't have to right to ask you (the person who I admit knows a lot about the topic) a couple of questions directly, as opposed to sifting through over a hundred pages to find the answer.