Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#2911 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 05:54 PM

Bourdon finishes the game with no points +1 and 1 Shot with 4 Hits.
Cape Wins and now leads series 3-1.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#2912 User is offline   ModoExpress Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 06:05 PM

i hear eller is some hot s***.. danish right? is he gonna go in the the 2nd round or first
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#2913 User is offline   AK-47 Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,746
  • Joined: 08-December 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 07:05 PM

we should draft Eller

we got lucky with our first danish pick

why not pick another one

Malkin. Semin. Ovechkin. Kovalchuk.
RIP Alexei Cherepanov and Michael Jackson
AK ♚ 47
0

#2914 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 08:53 PM

View PostAK-47, on Apr 25 2007, 07:05 PM, said:

we should draft Eller

we got lucky with our first danish pick

why not pick another one



And he is having a great season in the Swedish Elite League (might be SEL Jrs) but its not some no name Danish club.

I would love to get a North American with size (Sutter or Veillieux) + a skilled Euro Centre (Backlund, Anderson, Eller or Moller)
Posted Image
0

#2915 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,253
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 09:23 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 25 2007, 05:33 PM, said:

I don't think we'll get a crack at Couture, but it all depends on the needs of other teams.

CGY might not pass on Sutter though...

Vellieux's stock has been regressing for the last little while, but I would not mind a 6'5 centre with our 2nd rounder.
Sutter ftw, with one of the euro centres with our 2nd rounder (Backlund, Eller, Moller)




Plante or Hickey could be a solid D man to pick up as well in the 2nd. Who knows what this year is going to do. Could be a 99 Draft but then it could be a draft with a whole wack of late bloomers.

Just my wishlist for top 3 picks

1st Couture/Sutter/Moller
2nd Vellieux/Plante/Backlund
2nd Mahachek/Hickey/Eller


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#2916 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 09:26 PM

View PostDortmund, on Apr 25 2007, 09:23 PM, said:

Plante or Hickey could be a solid D man to pick up as well in the 2nd. Who knows what this year is going to do. Could be a 99 Draft but then it could be a draft with a whole wack of late bloomers.

Just my wishlist for top 3 picks

1st Couture/Sutter/Moller
2nd Vellieux/Plante/Backlund
2nd Mahachek/Hickey/Eller



We have one second rounder (LA 34th)

Unless LA wants our 2nd round next year which is quite possible.
Posted Image
0

#2917 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 09:42 PM

I want that 2nd rounder back for Sopel.....
Posted Image
0

#2918 User is offline   Grabner Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,746
  • Joined: 18-August 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 10:30 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 25 2007, 09:42 PM, said:

I want that 2nd rounder back for Sopel.....


While were at it...why not get back that 2nd rounder for Noronen. ;)
0

#2919 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 25 April 2007 - 10:57 PM

8:44 of Ice Time for Edler tonight. I was kind of surprised to see Edler as physical as he was tonight. That's usually not his style, but I like what I see :P

Just imagine if he could gain about 10 pounds or so...

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#2920 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,022
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 26 April 2007 - 08:37 AM

I want some Canadian tough forwards with size! Canucks will lose against Anaheim because they are not physically tough enough.
0

#2921 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,987
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 April 2007 - 12:26 PM

View Post-mb, on Apr 24 2007, 08:03 AM, said:

Well... the Sedins set that whole play up, and it was Ohlunds shot from the point. Not to mention Henrik scored the most important goal of the game when he tied it up.

And Bulis has been playing better than he has all season.



We would not have been in that position if they were scoring and defending in Ohlunds case like it needs to be in the playoffs in lieu of choking. Henrik passes to his brother with an open net, that should tell you something. They are more concerned about how they themselfs look instead of the team. Enough said.
0

#2922 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,987
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 April 2007 - 12:30 PM

View PostGrabner, on Apr 24 2007, 10:00 PM, said:

If someone offered it to us, would you guys trade both of our top two picks for a top 15 pick and a late second rounder...?



NO, #34 pick could be a guy like Velleux
0

#2923 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,987
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 April 2007 - 12:40 PM

View Postitzabreeze, on Apr 25 2007, 04:15 PM, said:

Raymond, Rahimi in, Grabner out.

Raymond playing with Schultz. Appearently, Edler will be playing with Fitz tonight. Dear God NO.



Check the +/- for Edler and Fitz. Try to give Fitz credit once in a while he is not that bad, been there for us all year.
0

#2924 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,987
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 April 2007 - 12:59 PM

View PostDortmund, on Apr 25 2007, 09:23 PM, said:

Plante or Hickey could be a solid D man to pick up as well in the 2nd. Who knows what this year is going to do. Could be a 99 Draft but then it could be a draft with a whole wack of late bloomers.

Just my wishlist for top 3 picks

1st Couture/Sutter/Moller
2nd Vellieux/Plante/Backlund
2nd Mahachek/Hickey/Eller



Good list, but I would like to get the Defencman from Prince George in the later rounds he is 6'5' and weighs 237lbs. just for when the Salami comes into our end.
0

#2925 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 26 April 2007 - 12:59 PM

View Postone night, on Apr 26 2007, 12:40 PM, said:

Check the +/- for Edler and Fitz. Try to give Fitz credit once in a while he is not that bad, been there for us all year.



A +/- does really mean f*** all to me. He is what he is. He is what his role is, a medeocor 7th defenceman at best. I just feel bad for Edler for putting a 20 year old kid who played in the WHL less then 12 months ago throwing him into a Playoff game against one the the top 2 teams in the league, setting him up in a situation where he could fail and cripple his confidence.

Anyways, with that said Fitz does look better then Sopel at this point.... :P

Bye Bye in the off-season to you!.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#2926 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,987
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:00 PM

View PostDortmund, on Apr 25 2007, 09:23 PM, said:

Plante or Hickey could be a solid D man to pick up as well in the 2nd. Who knows what this year is going to do. Could be a 99 Draft but then it could be a draft with a whole wack of late bloomers.

Just my wishlist for top 3 picks

1st Couture/Sutter/Moller
2nd Vellieux/Plante/Backlund
2nd Mahachek/Hickey/Eller



Good list, but I would like to get the Defencman from Prince George in the later rounds he is 6'5" and weighs 237lbs. just for when the Salami comes into our end.

This post has been edited by one night: 26 April 2007 - 01:01 PM

0

#2927 User is offline   Rinslet Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,283
  • Joined: 08-November 06

Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:30 PM

View Postone night, on Apr 26 2007, 01:00 PM, said:

Good list, but I would like to get the Defencman from Prince George in the later rounds he is 6'5" and weighs 237lbs. just for when the Salami comes into our end.

We don't need another defenceman. We have so many defensive prospects as it is.
0

#2928 User is offline   ModoExpress Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:36 PM

how did u guys think edler played last night?

i thought he did well, did way better than sopel and fitz. I hope stays and sopel sits
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#2929 User is offline   Rinslet Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,283
  • Joined: 08-November 06

Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:39 PM

View PostModoExpress, on Apr 26 2007, 01:36 PM, said:

how did u guys think edler played last night?

i thought he did well, did way better than sopel and fitz. I hope stays and sopel sits

Edler played okay. Fitz played okay. Both of them definitely did better than Sopel, but I guess they're playing well with the minutes given to them. If you give Edler more than 10-15 minutes right now, you might see him make more mistakes.
0

#2930 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 26 April 2007 - 01:41 PM

Rahimi:

Posted Image

This post has been edited by toxic rd: 26 April 2007 - 01:41 PM

QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. MSN/Bing

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.