Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 285
  • 286
  • 287
  • 288
  • 289
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#5711 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,022
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 18 April 2008 - 07:13 AM

View PostAll Highlight Reel, on Apr 17 2008, 09:02 PM, said:

I know that above post of mine was an O Rly ? That we've been discussing worriedly for the past million posts but I can't help reiterating it as it will be on the back of my mind till we get a new GM and that in conjunction with the draft and off-season. Jeff Carter seems like he would take more to get if he is what a new GM would genuinely pursue. I hope we can avoid giving up the #10 draft pick in any scenario of pursuit that presents itself.


I was surprised to read that some thought we could get Carter for Edler. I don't think we could get him for Edler, Bieska + our #1 pic. The way he is playing he is becoming more unattainable at a cost that the Canucks could afford. Nonis put a very positive twist on his team assessment the other day. While I would agree that it was better than 3 years ago it is nowhere near being competitive in the next two seasons. If he was canned for not pulling the trigger with TB for Richards, then I dispair at the future of the franchise. That deal would have stripped the club and left Richards playing with himself!

Building through the draft is the only option Van has until it has enough talent to deal with. I do not think they have reached that point yet. Realistically you could not assume that the club has a clear assessment of Edler, Bourdon, Raymond, Jaffrey, Scnieder(?) or even Bieska. The laughable reality is that if Canuck management had been realistic they would have blown the team up at the end of '03 and started rebuilding then. Three years of cellar dwelling would have restocked the team with serious talent.
0

#5712 User is offline   falcon Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,269
  • Joined: 16-October 07

Posted 18 April 2008 - 11:26 PM

View PostBoudrias, on Apr 18 2008, 07:13 AM, said:

I was surprised to read that some thought we could get Carter for Edler. I don't think we could get him for Edler, Bieska + our #1 pic. The way he is playing he is becoming more unattainable at a cost that the Canucks could afford. Nonis put a very positive twist on his team assessment the other day. While I would agree that it was better than 3 years ago it is nowhere near being competitive in the next two seasons. If he was canned for not pulling the trigger with TB for Richards, then I dispair at the future of the franchise. That deal would have stripped the club and left Richards playing with himself!


I don't think it would go as far as Edler Bieksa + a top 10 pick, maybe a combination of any two and some throw-ins.

Quote

Building through the draft is the only option Van has until it has enough talent to deal with. I do not think they have reached that point yet. Realistically you could not assume that the club has a clear assessment of Edler, Bourdon, Raymond, Jaffrey, Scnieder(?) or even Bieska. The laughable reality is that if Canuck management had been realistic they would have blown the team up at the end of '03 and started rebuilding then. Three years of cellar dwelling would have restocked the team with serious talent.


Well given the attention span of Canucks fans, GM place would be empty after a couple of years of bottom dwelling. Either that or we fire another 5 GM's in the process because "no playoffs is unacceptable", and all of them labeled "fired because he had no balls" because they wouldnt' blow the 1st round away for Satan at the deadline.
0

#5713 User is online   Sanford Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,576
  • Joined: 23-December 07

Posted 20 April 2008 - 12:52 PM

Cody Hodgson just helped team Canada beat finland, He scored the winning goal, it was a 2-1 game.
0

#5714 User is offline   Carpe Diem Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,414
  • Joined: 19-January 03

Posted 20 April 2008 - 02:01 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 17 2008, 07:08 PM, said:

Well that was the 26th pick in a draft where after the first 7, and players from the 10-60 could go at ANY position, it was just the kind of draft that it was.

In this draft, it is much deeper after 7 and there will be guys that are clearly a level above the guys in the 14+ spots.


What I should say is that we will have the option of Boedker, Wilson or Hodgson, and if they are all taken, that means one of the Filatov, Bogosian, Schenn, Pietrangelo, or Doughty have fallen right into our laps somehow.


With Beach free-falling, there is a chance that all 8 of those players (+ Stamkos) would have been picked.
0

#5715 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,937
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 20 April 2008 - 06:13 PM

I'd be very surprised at this point if Hodgson was available to us at 10 considering how well he's played at the world U-18 juniors.

That being said I'd like to see us go for Knuble. If we could go for Carter at the same time, all the better, but going after Knuble would def be a good idea by the new GM. I'd go as far as our 10th, Bieksa, Edler, and Schneider for Knuble and Carter.
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#5716 User is offline   Canadian Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,293
  • Joined: 09-May 03

Posted 20 April 2008 - 06:20 PM

View PostPsycho_Path, on Apr 20 2008, 06:13 PM, said:

I'd be very surprised at this point if Hodgson was available to us at 10 considering how well he's played at the world U-18 juniors.

That being said I'd like to see us go for Knuble. If we could go for Carter at the same time, all the better, but going after Knuble would def be a good idea by the new GM. I'd go as far as our 10th, Bieksa, Edler, and Schneider for Knuble and Carter.

Holy overpayment batman!
~~~IN LUONGO WE TRUST~~~
Posted Image
0

#5717 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,022
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 21 April 2008 - 07:15 AM

View Postfalcon, on Apr 19 2008, 12:26 AM, said:

I don't think it would go as far as Edler Bieksa + a top 10 pick, maybe a combination of any two and some throw-ins.
Well given the attention span of Canucks fans, GM place would be empty after a couple of years of bottom dwelling. Either that or we fire another 5 GM's in the process because "no playoffs is unacceptable", and all of them labeled "fired because he had no balls" because they wouldnt' blow the 1st round away for Satan at the deadline.


Sad but true. TO fills the stands every year and seem to do well with mediocrity. It could become the in thing!
0

#5718 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 22 April 2008 - 04:42 PM

I wish Jarmo Kekalinen was our Director of Scouting :(
Posted Image
0

#5719 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,312
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 22 April 2008 - 04:59 PM

I watched that special again

That has to be one of the most successful drafts for any team in recent memory, they got every player they targeted, plus a diamond in the rough (Palushaj) all the while GETTING more picks than they entered with

I stand in awe both of Jarmo, and the deals Larry Pleau made
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#5720 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 22 April 2008 - 05:55 PM

View PostToxic, on Apr 22 2008, 04:59 PM, said:

I watched that special again

That has to be one of the most successful drafts for any team in recent memory, they got every player they targeted, plus a diamond in the rough (Palushaj) all the while GETTING more picks than they entered with

I stand in awe both of Jarmo, and the deals Larry Pleau made



And Jarmo just speaks with such confidence and just sounds like a guy who gets it.

Too bad, Markus Naslund agent just became our GM.

Rookie GM who will want to make a splash, bye bye prospects.

Bye bye top 10 pick.
Posted Image
0

#5721 User is offline   Gnickers87 Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12,101
  • Joined: 27-January 06

Posted 22 April 2008 - 06:08 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 22 2008, 05:55 PM, said:

And Jarmo just speaks with such confidence and just sounds like a guy who gets it.

Too bad, Markus Naslund agent just became our GM.

Rookie GM who will want to make a splash, bye bye prospects.

Bye bye top 10 pick.


Maybe we should start a "Who do we trade our 1st Round Pick For" thread :lol:

This post has been edited by Gnickers87: 22 April 2008 - 06:09 PM

QUOTE (cphil19 @ Feb 3 2009, 09:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Lolz at loser Canucks. Thank god I'm an Isles fan.


...err what?
0

#5722 User is offline   jayRmichigan Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,640
  • Joined: 24-January 04

Posted 22 April 2008 - 07:13 PM

You have to give Gillis some credit. He's a smart guy, who's been around the sport for years. Obviously I don't know his style of management, so I can't exactly say he's not going to make a big splash, but I seriously doubt he'll do anything stupid.
0

#5723 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 22 April 2008 - 07:50 PM

View PostjayRmichigan, on Apr 22 2008, 07:13 PM, said:

You have to give Gillis some credit. He's a smart guy, who's been around the sport for years. Obviously I don't know his style of management, so I can't exactly say he's not going to make a big splash, but I seriously doubt he'll do anything stupid.



Yeah, I know, just a little reactionary.

Especially since Aquilini is hypocrite.

"Extensive experience is neccesary"

So he gets the guy with no GM'ing experience.

But I hope this means that we will never overpay severely for UFA's and the scouting staff gets overhauled after the draft, get rid of the alumni guys who seldom successful picks (Keep Gradin, Payne, Euro Scouts, FIRE THE SLOVENIA SCOUT!!!)
Posted Image
0

#5724 User is offline   Hinkil Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,407
  • Joined: 30-May 07

Posted 22 April 2008 - 11:11 PM

did he qualify that as gm'ing experience? cos he has experience with FAs and all that jazz...
0

#5725 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 23 April 2008 - 06:28 AM

Being a GM is more than just signing Free Agents.

I just hope Gilles can be successful in all aspects of his job and does not gut the organization.



BTW, MG says they will be having "different" draft ideas moving forward.


Is looking at draft records and the results, will evaluate them, scouting is a concern, not enough high end players.

Pretty much means Delorme/Snepts/Smyl will be canned.



Quote

“Coming from where I’ve come from, I’m hoping to bring a different perspective in terms of player relations, I’m hoping to bring different ideas to the draft table and player development

This post has been edited by timw33: 23 April 2008 - 03:50 PM

Posted Image
0

#5726 User is offline   All Highlight Reel Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,593
  • Joined: 03-November 07

Posted 25 April 2008 - 12:38 PM

I trust there will be no 'in between' with MG, he'll either be amazing or we'll be driven into a drunken comatose state for the next few years trying to recover.
I'll cautiously learn towards amazing for now... but if I have to bite my words - I doubt I'll even be in the state to be on this sub-forum anyway.
GO CANADA GO!!!
0

#5727 User is offline   nucks&bombers Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,312
  • Joined: 29-April 07

Posted 25 April 2008 - 12:39 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 23 2008, 08:28 AM, said:

Being a GM is more than just signing Free Agents.

I just hope Gilles can be successful in all aspects of his job and does not gut the organization.



BTW, MG says they will be having "different" draft ideas moving forward.


Is looking at draft records and the results, will evaluate them, scouting is a concern, not enough high end players.

Pretty much means Delorme/Snepts/Smyl will be canned.


If he fires Gradin I will kill something.
"You know its funny, when it rains it pours they got money for wars but can't feed the poor"
0

#5728 User is offline   Psycho_Path Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,937
  • Joined: 18-September 06

Posted 25 April 2008 - 07:04 PM

He doesn't seem unintelligent enough to do something as dumb as fire Gradin. He's gotten us most of our better prospects (especially in the later rounds) lately.
Favorite Game: Rock Band 2
0

#5729 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Assistant to Regional Manager
  • Posts: 26,718
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 25 April 2008 - 07:53 PM

View Postnucks&bombers, on Apr 25 2008, 11:39 AM, said:

If he fires Gradin I will kill something.



Gradin has bought himself about 2 more seasons with the Edler pick alone.

Rahimi was a pretty good one too, especially since there weren't too many players we passed on that would've been way better.




On another note, I have been reading "Future Greats and Heart Breaks" by Gare Joyce, a book where he spends a year as a scout and gets to sit in on Columbus' scouting meetings, prospect interviews, and does a whole year scouting players.

Very very interesting, shows how the scouting process works and how they make the master list.

A lot more goes into drafting than taking the player with the best stats.



And CSS, ISS, CSB, Redline and Mckeen's rankings mean NOTHING.

Zip. Zero. Nadda.

They could care less what these services say.
Posted Image
0

#5730 User is offline   nucks&bombers Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,312
  • Joined: 29-April 07

Posted 25 April 2008 - 10:46 PM

View Posttimw33, on Apr 25 2008, 08:53 PM, said:

Gradin has bought himself about 2 more seasons with the Edler pick alone.

Rahimi was a pretty good one too, especially since there weren't too many players we passed on that would've been way better.




On another note, I have been reading "Future Greats and Heart Breaks" by Gare Joyce, a book where he spends a year as a scout and gets to sit in on Columbus' scouting meetings, prospect interviews, and does a whole year scouting players.

Very very interesting, shows how the scouting process works and how they make the master list.

A lot more goes into drafting than taking the player with the best stats.



And CSS, ISS, CSB, Redline and Mckeen's rankings mean NOTHING.Zip. Zero. Nadda.

They could care less what these services say.


try convincing the CDC zombie level inteligence masses of that.
"You know its funny, when it rains it pours they got money for wars but can't feed the poor"
0

  • (391 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 285
  • 286
  • 287
  • 288
  • 289
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.