[-mb]

Schneids with the win!

4-1 win

31 Saves 1 GA

[Dortmund]

I hope MacIntyre is still slightly hurt because he's outplayed Flaherty all season and still doesn't get the majority of the starts.

Just look at the numbers:

Mac 2.21 .924% 2 SO 17 W 8 L 2 SL
Fla 2.53 .905% 1 SO 14 W 9 L 2 SL

the GP is skewed because Wade was out for 3 weeks.

[jayRmichigan]

Simek with no points in a 4-0 win.

[nazzy-luongo-19-1]

gonucksgo0420 said:

toxic rd said:

AmazingNuck said:

CSteele said:

i love this thread

[itzabreeze]

No points for either Hansen or Edler, but the Moose win again 3-0 agaist Pogge :twisted:

Edler did pick up a boarding penalty though, I'm so proud :twisted:

[CCF4E]

itzabreeze said:

No points for either Hansen or Edler, but the Moose win again 3-0 agaist Pogge :twisted:  

Edler did pick up a boarding penalty though, I'm so proud :twisted:

[one night]

Dortmund said:

I hope MacIntyre is still slightly hurt because he's outplayed Flaherty all season and still doesn't get the majority of the starts.

Just look at the numbers:

Mac  2.21 .924% 2 SO  17 W 8 L  2 SL
Fla   2.53  .905% 1 SO  14 W 9 L 2 SL

the GP is skewed because Wade was out for 3 weeks.

Wade got the shut out tonite 3-0 over the marlies.

[ModoExpress]

CCF4E said:

itzabreeze said:

No points for either Hansen or Edler, but the Moose win again 3-0 agaist Pogge :twisted:  

Edler did pick up a boarding penalty though, I'm so proud :twisted:

How is pogge doing... i'm curious?

everyone says he such hot s***

[itzabreeze]

ModoExpress said:

CCF4E said:

itzabreeze said:

No points for either Hansen or Edler, but the Moose win again 3-0 agaist Pogge :twisted:  

Edler did pick up a boarding penalty though, I'm so proud :twisted:

How is pogge doing... i'm curious?

everyone says he such hot s***

Average, although the kid still has a ton of time to develop. The Laffs were idiots for trading Rask.

His stats are:
11W 18L
892 S%
3.20GAA

Granted, the team is front of him I would say is poor. Yet, people always talk about all the great "kids" the Laffs have.....

[one night]

Bourdon got an assist tonite and was +2

[Grabner]

itzabreeze said:

No points for either Hansen or Edler, but the Moose win again 3-0 agaist Pogge :twisted:  

Edler did pick up a boarding penalty though, I'm so proud :twisted:

I like it.

I wonder if he's ever fought before, he looks so innocent.

[Blister Soul]

nazzy-luongo-19-1 said:

gonucksgo0420 said:

toxic rd said:

AmazingNuck said:

CSteele said:

i love this thread

[youneedhockey101]

timw33 said:

youneedhockey101 said:

i hope this is not a stupid question
but what should be our draft strategy?  should we draft the best player avaliable?  or draft the players that we need now?

for example, if a goalie is the best player when its our turn, do we draft the goalie (maybe later use him as trade bait) or pass on the goalie to get a forward?

Drafting a goalie would be stupid.

Well you have to adress your needs and we have no centres in the system so we really need a centre.

The talent level is pretty even for where we will be picking.

well, the player we draft this year might not even avaliable soon, and as soon as he is avaliable, the team might not even needs forward anymore (aka bourdon all over again)

[AllHeartNoTalent]

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?

Maybe that's a bad example, because of Schremp's supposed attitude problem, but: if we could acquire a young scoring forward prospect for a young defensive prospect, would you want us to?

[jayRmichigan]

AllHeartNoTalent said:

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?

Maybe that's a bad example, because of Schremp's supposed attitude problem, but: if we could acquire a young scoring forward prospect for a young defensive prospect, would you want us to?

I wouldn't mind that, because that way you would have a better idea of whether a player will turn out ok or not. But I'd be kinda scared to trade away our defensive prospects, because I don't think we're actually all that strong at defense. I mean right now Edler is the only one who I am above 90% sure will play in the NHL in the next couple of years. Bourdon could easily turn out to be a bust, none of us have ever seen Rahimi play so he could be a bust pretty easily too, and at this point I really can't see Koltsov playing for the Canucks next year.

But the Canucks will probably draft centers and forwards with their higher picks.

[vincetheprince]

how did raymond do yesterday?

[Boudrias]

Just as someone observed that Grabner was a bit of a perimeter and transition player I noticed that Simek was doing the same in a TV game a couple of weeks ago. Haven't seen enough of him to have a good opinion tho. Not unusal behavior for Euros and coaching has to focus on developing an all around game.

[Winger]

toxic rd said:

e again, tune in your TVU player to NESN and you can watch the 3rd period of the BC game and see Schneider

dammit i hate living in ontario

[Dortmund]

Well Ellis is at it again, his stint up with the Moose a couple weeks ago has done wonders for him. He's starting to understand how to compete very well at a professional level. He made 37 saves in a 3-1 win last night.

Raymond had no points last night as they played Wisconsin the defending NCAA champions. Also, we'll know real soon if he plans on jumping to pro as UMD will be done by Mar 11th.

[itzabreeze]

AllHeartNoTalent said:

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?

LMFAO.

Schremp sucks. Seriously, he is one of the most overrated prospects out their. Sure, he put up BIG #'s in the high scoring OHL. But look at his stats this year:

AHL 52Gp 13A 25Pts

and he was taken 25th Overall in the 2004 draft...

Hell, the Canucks Jannick Hansen who has taken freaking 287th OVEREALLin the 2004 draft has:

55Gp 9G 18A 27Pts

Not saying that Hansen will be a better player then Schremp, but come on....