Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#721 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 12:01 PM

itzabreeze said:

AllHeartNoTalent said:

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?


LMFAO.

Schremp sucks. Seriously, he is one of the most overrated prospects out their. Sure, he put up BIG #'s in the high scoring OHL. But look at his stats this year:

AHL 52Gp 13A 25Pts

and he was taken 25th Overall in the 2004 draft...

Hell, the Canucks Jannick Hansen who has taken freaking 287th OVEREALLin the 2004 draft has:

55Gp 9G 18A 27Pts

Not saying that Hansen will be a better player then Schremp, but come on....



The biggest late sleeper pick of the past few years seems to be Brett Sterling, he's tearing up the AHL making Schremp's 1st round pick even worse. Sterling(5th rounder) has 44 G 32 A for 76 pts.....College players seem to be coming more and more into their own the past few years. That's why I and other are getting so excited for Raymond.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#722 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 01:45 PM

Prospect games for Saturday!:

FYI, I'll start with NCAA kids because this is their last game of the Reg. NCAA season for THEM. Playoff's start next weekend, appearently Raymond's team does get to play in the Playoffs, yet they have a very poor record.

Wisconsin @ Minnesota-Duluth (Raymond)

Posted Image

New Hampshire @ Boston College (Schneider)
Posted Image

Moose @ Marlies.....again (Elder, Hansen, & Friends)
Posted Image

Salmon Kings @ Falcons (Ellis)


Posted Image

Québec Remparts @ Cape Breton (Bourdon)
Posted Image

Cheifs @ Everett (Grabtastic )


Posted Image

Moose Jaw @ Wheat Kings (Simek)

Posted Image

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#723 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 01:49 PM

March 2, 2007
http://www.uscho.com...3/02/bc-unh.php

BC Dominates Third Ranked New Hampshire
by Christina Coleman/USCHO Arena Reporter

DURHAM, N.H. — The ninth ranked Boston College Eagles defeated No. 3 New Hampshire Friday Night, 4-1, spoiling Senior Night at the Whittemore Center. Boston College improved to 21-11-1, 17-8-1 in Hockey East while New Hampshire fell to 23-8-2, 18-6-2 in league play.

Nathan Gerbe scored twice for BC and goaltender Cory Schneider had 31 saves on the night. The scoring didn’t start until near the end of the first period. Boston College would start it off at 16:04 when junior Matt Greene scored off a Benn Ferriero rebound for his fourth goal of the season to make a 1-0 game.

UNH’s Jerry Pollastrone had the chance to score on a breakaway but Schneider made the save on the bid. BC would increase it’s lead to 2-0 when they were on the man advantage late in the first. Nathan Gerbe got his first goal of the night after goalie Kevin Regan faced a flurry of shots, but was unable to stop Gerbe’s. Brock Bradford and Brian Boyle were credited with the assists.

In the second period the Wildcats would try and dig themselves out of a two goal deficit. Junior Matt Fornataro would have his shot go off the post seven minutes into the period. Midway through the second frame Trevor Smith and Jerry Pollastrone would set up Chris Murray to score his eighth goal of the season and make it a one goal game. That would be the only goal scored in the period.


The third period had two goals scored, both empty nets by Boston College. New Hampshire called a timeout with 1:04 left and then decided to pull Regan. Just seven seconds later Gerbe would get his second of the game. Regan stayed on the bench and the face off returned to the Boston College end. BC won the faceoff and Ferriero would get the goal to seal the win and make it a 4-1 final.

“I thought the difference tonight was we got terrific goaltending from Cory Schneider and our special teams was successful. We had one goal and we killed a penalty late in the period. They had the puck really moving very well but we were in good passing lines and we had a great block from Mike Brennan,” said BC head coach Jerry York.

“Obviously we are disappointed with our loss and I thought we had our chances and it was a 2-1 hockey game and we obviously couldn’t get it tied up. Told the team at least we got back battling and if there’s any consolation to the game we take something positive out of it. We gotta get down there tomorrow and get a spilt,” UNH’s Dick Umile said.

The hockey east playoffs are beginning to shape up after some of tonight’s games. Last Saturday New Hampshire clinched the number one spot in the playoffs and with tonight’s win Boston College is now the number two seed.

Providence was able to receive the 8th spot after beating Merrimack 7-2. They will travel up to Durham to face UNH in a best of three game series next week. Boston College will host Northeastern in a three game series as well.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#724 User is offline   thecupismine Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,360
  • Joined: 27-August 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 02:24 PM

Dortmund said:

itzabreeze said:

AllHeartNoTalent said:

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?


LMFAO.

Schremp sucks. Seriously, he is one of the most overrated prospects out their. Sure, he put up BIG #'s in the high scoring OHL. But look at his stats this year:

AHL 52Gp 13A 25Pts

and he was taken 25th Overall in the 2004 draft...

Hell, the Canucks Jannick Hansen who has taken freaking 287th OVEREALLin the 2004 draft has:

55Gp 9G 18A 27Pts

Not saying that Hansen will be a better player then Schremp, but come on....



The biggest late sleeper pick of the past few years seems to be Brett Sterling, he's tearing up the AHL making Schremp's 1st round pick even worse. Sterling(5th rounder) has 44 G 32 A for 76 pts.....College players seem to be coming more and more into their own the past few years. That's why I and other are getting so excited for Raymond.


I think Schremp is overated, but at the same time his development has been stunted by playing with the Wike Bars. Edmonton and pits share the same minor league team, meaning it will be stacked with more talented youngsters. That leaves less room for error, and being Schremp's first season in the AHL, he's going to make mistakes. However, they won't let him continue to play, which is stupid because if he doesn't get time to play how is he ever supposed to develop? Glad am I happy that the Canucks were smart enough to get their own minor league affiliate, not like the stupid Oilers. Their prospects growth will be majorly stunted because Pits has a lot of young talent as well and they'll be too many players fighting for too little spots.
0

#725 User is offline   __xxccnineteen Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Joined: 15-June 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 02:51 PM

Bourdon is sal/ohlund mixed? Beast with offence? :o

^me on the sig.
... VISIT MY WEBSITE AT...
[[THIS LINK]].
for more sigs walls logos' etc!
0

#726 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 03:09 PM

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Bourdon is sal/ohlund mixed? Beast with offence? :o



I'd be satisfied if he just became Luc Bourdon and not anyone else. He could be Salo, He could be Ohlund but I think his skating is superior to both just needs to learn the game and develop.


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#727 User is offline   Jester@wraiths.ca Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9,621
  • Joined: 03-August 05

Posted 03 March 2007 - 03:35 PM

thecupismine said:

Dortmund said:

itzabreeze said:

AllHeartNoTalent said:

Along the lines of filling needs, given the depth we have on our current roster and with our prospects at defense, what does everyone think of the possibility of swapping a defensive prospect for an offensive prospect? Grabner's been showing well, but he's still realistically a couple of years away. If we could aquire, say, a Robbie Schremp for a Luc Bourdon, would you do it?


LMFAO.

Schremp sucks. Seriously, he is one of the most overrated prospects out their. Sure, he put up BIG #'s in the high scoring OHL. But look at his stats this year:

AHL 52Gp 13A 25Pts

and he was taken 25th Overall in the 2004 draft...

Hell, the Canucks Jannick Hansen who has taken freaking 287th OVEREALLin the 2004 draft has:

55Gp 9G 18A 27Pts

Not saying that Hansen will be a better player then Schremp, but come on....



The biggest late sleeper pick of the past few years seems to be Brett Sterling, he's tearing up the AHL making Schremp's 1st round pick even worse. Sterling(5th rounder) has 44 G 32 A for 76 pts.....College players seem to be coming more and more into their own the past few years. That's why I and other are getting so excited for Raymond.


I think Schremp is overated, but at the same time his development has been stunted by playing with the Wike Bars. Edmonton and pits share the same minor league team, meaning it will be stacked with more talented youngsters. That leaves less room for error, and being Schremp's first season in the AHL, he's going to make mistakes. However, they won't let him continue to play, which is stupid because if he doesn't get time to play how is he ever supposed to develop? Glad am I happy that the Canucks were smart enough to get their own minor league affiliate, not like the stupid Oilers. Their prospects growth will be majorly stunted because Pits has a lot of young talent as well and they'll be too many players fighting for too little spots.


And Schremp is supposed to be in the minors to improve the defensive aspects of his game, not worry about scoring. He has the offensive flair of most 2 young players combined, but he really realllly needs to work on the defense.
Mattias Weinhandl: 2nd in SEL scoring 07/08, 2nd in playoff scoring 07/08. 3rd in WC scoring in 08 & 09 only behind established NHL stars, 16 pts in 12 games in 08/09 KHL playoffs (leader had 19 pts in 21 games). Invited to 2010 Swedish Olympic team camp. He deserves another shot in the NHL................Currently LEADS the KHL in scoring, 28 points in 21 games
0

#728 User is offline   __xxccnineteen Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Joined: 15-June 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 03:35 PM

Dortmund said:

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Bourdon is sal/ohlund mixed? Beast with offence? :o



I'd be satisfied if he just became Luc Bourdon and not anyone else. He could be Salo, He could be Ohlund but I think his skating is superior to both just needs to learn the game and develop.


Well, I have hope :D

^me on the sig.
... VISIT MY WEBSITE AT...
[[THIS LINK]].
for more sigs walls logos' etc!
0

#729 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 04:33 PM

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later

2. We do NOT have great defensive depth, other than Edler Rahimi and Bourdon there's really nobody, Koltsov wont be considered a prospect this off-season to me, and we have NOTHING on the right side of our defensive depth chart. Fredheim can be a good, but its too early. And for the record, Patrick Coulombe is a fringe prospect right now
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#730 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 03 March 2007 - 04:50 PM

toxic rd said:

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later


Meaning the audio will not be available? I'm assuming this isn't a case of you not being willing to share but rather restrictions put upon by CDC?
0

#731 User is offline   ModoExpress Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:32 PM

toxic rd said:

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later

2. We do NOT have great defensive depth, other than Edler Rahimi and Bourdon there's really nobody, Koltsov wont be considered a prospect this off-season to me, and we have NOTHING on the right side of our defensive depth chart. Fredheim can be a good, but its too early. And for the record, Patrick Coulombe f*cking sucks, face it, he's more useless than Chad Brownlee


those are some heavy words man...
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#732 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:41 PM

ModoExpress said:

toxic rd said:

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later

2. We do NOT have great defensive depth, other than Edler Rahimi and Bourdon there's really nobody, Koltsov wont be considered a prospect this off-season to me, and we have NOTHING on the right side of our defensive depth chart. Fredheim can be a good, but its too early. And for the record, Patrick Coulombe f*cking sucks, face it, he's more useless than Chad Brownlee


those are some heavy words man...


Its true though, Coloumbe is a useless midget.

I can't believe someone said they want to trade for Scremp, didn't he just feed points off of Corey Perry in Junior?

And we need a centre with size, where Scremp is under 6'.

And we don't need a little hotdogger.
Posted Image
0

#733 User is offline   Locke Lamora Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 414
  • Joined: 09-September 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:45 PM

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Dortmund said:

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Bourdon is sal/ohlund mixed? Beast with offence? :o



I'd be satisfied if he just became Luc Bourdon and not anyone else. He could be Salo, He could be Ohlund but I think his skating is superior to both just needs to learn the game and develop.


Well, I have hope :D


I think Bourdon could be better than Ohlund or Salo. He's meaner than both, faster than both, and while his shot may never reach Salo velocities, he's got some real offensive skills.

As long as the Canucks don't rush him and allow him to work on his hockey I.Q., he is going to be a force. :twisted:
0

#734 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:49 PM

Locke Lamora said:

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Dortmund said:

CanuckCrazy19 said:

Bourdon is sal/ohlund mixed? Beast with offence? :o



I'd be satisfied if he just became Luc Bourdon and not anyone else. He could be Salo, He could be Ohlund but I think his skating is superior to both just needs to learn the game and develop.


Well, I have hope :D


I think Bourdon could be better than Ohlund or Salo. He's meaner than both, faster than both, and while his shot may never reach Salo velocities, he's got some real offensive skills.

As long as the Canucks don't rush him and allow him to work on his hockey I.Q., he is going to be a force. :twisted:


Everyone just keeps going after his hockey sense....christ almighty.

How does a guy with terrible hockey sense become a +22 in about 30 games?
Posted Image
0

#735 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:57 PM

timw33 said:

Its true though, Coloumbe is a useless midget.


Pretty harsh and definitely not true. He's what 22? Give him a break, just because he is 5'9 doesn't mean he won't amount to anything in the NHL.

timw33 said:

I can't believe someone said they want to trade for Scremp, didn't he just feed points off of Corey Perry in Junior?



Schremp scored 145 points last season without Perry. Compared to 90 points the year before with Perry. Seems to me like Schremp thrived the with more icetime, rather than simply feeding off of top players.

timw33 said:

And we need a centre with size, where Scremp is under 6'.


Adding Schremp now may not be a bad idea. Well not just Schremp, any young centre with some promise. The centre we draft this year will need to develop. Look at a guy like Spezza. Drafted 2nd overall, ripped it up in the OHL and AHL and it took him about 3-4 years to get where he is today.

I'm not saying we should trade our current prospects for Schremp or anybody else for that matter. But if Nonis gets an offer in which a young centre comes our way don't be surpised. In no way will the centre we draft this year solve our prospect situation. Nonis has done a great job so far but it will take a few more years of solid drafting and developing players before we have great depth.
0

#736 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:59 PM

^^^

Spezza owned in the AHL.
Schremp far from owns in the AHL.
Posted Image
0

#737 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 05:59 PM

ModoExpress said:

toxic rd said:

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later

2. We do NOT have great defensive depth, other than Edler Rahimi and Bourdon there's really nobody, Koltsov wont be considered a prospect this off-season to me, and we have NOTHING on the right side of our defensive depth chart. Fredheim can be a good, but its too early. And for the record, Patrick Coulombe f*cking sucks, face it, he's more useless than Chad Brownlee


those are some heavy words man...


Coulombe has had a horrible season with the Moose. Sure he had a pretty damn good camp but now with the Moose now he usually finds himself in the pressbox each game... :twisted:

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#738 User is offline   Dortmund Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,217
  • Joined: 09-July 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 06:04 PM

itzabreeze said:

ModoExpress said:

toxic rd said:

1. The Jannik Hansen interview will not be available to anyone, if you want it you can read Part 1 on CDC, ill post the full typed out interview later

2. We do NOT have great defensive depth, other than Edler Rahimi and Bourdon there's really nobody, Koltsov wont be considered a prospect this off-season to me, and we have NOTHING on the right side of our defensive depth chart. Fredheim can be a good, but its too early. And for the record, Patrick Coulombe f*cking sucks, face it, he's more useless than Chad Brownlee


those are some heavy words man...


Coulombe has had a horrible season with the Moose. Sure he had a pretty damn good camp but now with the Moose now he usually finds himself in the pressbox each game... :twisted:



He also didn't make the clear day roster, I hope that means he goes to Victoria. It's a waste of any sort of development if he sits in the press box


Thanks to mr7 for the sig
0

#739 User is offline   ModoExpress Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,872
  • Joined: 01-October 06

Posted 03 March 2007 - 06:12 PM

Coulombe should change to forward position...

hes useless on D...

hes too small and can get pushed around by most nhl forwards
QUOTE (EdHardy @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Samuelsson> Sundin
0

#740 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 03 March 2007 - 06:15 PM

timw33 said:

^^^

Spezza owned in the AHL.
Schremp far from owns in the AHL.


I wasn't comparing Schremp to Spezza. I was just making a point that the player we draft won't be stepping in right away to centre guys like Grabner, Raymond ect. It may be 3-4 years down the road before we even see "The Centre" play in the NHL.
0

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.