Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#871 User is online   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 06 March 2007 - 11:02 PM

toxic rd said:

Grabner said:

Any update on the Grabinator?


no pts. in a 6-2 loss


And a -1.

Too bad.

At least they still have a game against Portland.
Posted Image
0

#872 User is offline   chiefs20167 Icon


  • Salmon Kings Star
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 56
  • Joined: 26-December 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 12:16 AM

timw33 said:

toxic rd said:

Grabner said:

Any update on the Grabinator?


no pts. in a 6-2 loss


And a -1.

Too bad.

At least they still have a game against Portland.


:(
Grabby didn't have any breakaway opportunities tonight, not saying that would have changed things though. Couple passes were broken up by the defense or were off by teammates.

There were a couple shots from the front or side of the net but only saw a few that got through to Irving.

Grabby did have a couple nice hits both open ice and along the boards.

Maybe this weekend will be better, more then.
0

#873 User is offline   zwillyc Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 827
  • Joined: 05-January 04

Posted 07 March 2007 - 12:23 AM

toxic rd said:

Grabner said:

Any update on the Grabinator?


no pts. in a 6-2 loss


Does this guy score against anyone other than Portland?
From some guy sitting 2 rows behind me at a David Copperfield show in Vegas:

"Hey David, can you make my wife disappear?"
0

#874 User is online   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 12:54 AM

chiefs20167 said:

timw33 said:

toxic rd said:

Grabner said:

Any update on the Grabinator?


no pts. in a 6-2 loss


And a -1.

Too bad.

At least they still have a game against Portland.


:(
Grabby didn't have any breakaway opportunities tonight, not saying that would have changed things though. Couple passes were broken up by the defense or were off by teammates.

There were a couple shots from the front or side of the net but only saw a few that got through to Irving.

Grabby did have a couple nice hits both open ice and along the boards.

Maybe this weekend will be better, more then.


Good to hear.

Do you have season tix to the chiefs?
Posted Image
0

#875 User is offline   Victorious Secret Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,311
  • Joined: 15-March 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:26 AM

Any news on Simek?
Posted Image
COD: MW2 [PSN: Revitalize]
0

#876 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:56 PM

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#877 User is online   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:58 PM

toxic rd said:

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?


I was thinking of doing a podcast too, I brought it up earlier in the thread.

But you should do a pilot episode.
Posted Image
0

#878 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 01:59 PM

timw33 said:

toxic rd said:

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?


I was thinking of doing a podcast too, I brought it up earlier in the thread.

But you should do a pilot episode.


Indeed, ill try and get opne working by the end of the week
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#879 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 03:06 PM

Schneiders new mask:

Posted Image
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#880 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 07 March 2007 - 04:16 PM

toxic rd said:

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?


Would definitely be worth it. I think outsiders would find it interesting to hear about the prospects rather than simply read reports.
0

#881 User is offline   youneedhockey101 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,119
  • Joined: 08-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 04:18 PM

mball said:

toxic rd said:

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?


Would definitely be worth it. I think outsiders would find it interesting to hear about the prospects rather than simply read reports.


i would listen to this for sure! thanks for doing this!
Calgary Flames: If you want quality hockey, dont be a Flames fan
Post #1000 at Sun Oct 29 2006 11:15

To grammar lover: come back to this site when this site become a grammar site
0

#882 User is offline   MrTubesteak Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 598
  • Joined: 14-July 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 04:20 PM

toxic rd said:

Im thinking of doing a weekly prospects podcast

Anyone think it would be worth it?


Might be interesting. However, I do like reading updates as opposed to listening to them. If there was a transcript of the podcast, that would be cool too.

Speaking of which, any word on the transcript of the Hansen interview?
0

#883 User is online   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 05:12 PM

Sutter is 21 on ISS.
Backlund 29.
Moller 25.
Hamill 18.
Posted Image
0

#884 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 05:17 PM

So for this draft how many 2nds do we have?

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#885 User is offline   carrotshirt Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 673
  • Joined: 19-September 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 05:22 PM

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?
You are.
0

#886 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 05:24 PM

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#887 User is offline   carrotshirt Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 673
  • Joined: 19-September 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 06:00 PM

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.
You are.
0

#888 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 06:11 PM

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.


Actually, the russian league's regular season is finished, all 52 games have been played for each team, Omsk now goes into the playoffs
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#889 User is offline   CCF4E Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 06:34 PM

timw33 said:

CCF4E said:

Hes in 06 :D


He is? where?
One of the Swedish Elite Teams, Byrnas I think,

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#890 User is offline   Tact Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,466
  • Joined: 13-May 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 06:36 PM

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.


Krajicek doesn't even play on the PP...

Ohlund - Bieksa
Sopel - Salo
0

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.