Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community
2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence
#895
Posted 07 March 2007 - 07:35 PM
It'd sure be nice to have a rookie like that on our team next year or the year after.

"Alain Vigneault: "The twins don't back down."
#896
Posted 07 March 2007 - 07:41 PM
sirwilliam said:
It'd sure be nice to have a rookie like that on our team next year or the year after.
Just do it, Lou. "Life is too important to take seriously."
#898
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:26 PM
itzabreeze said:
Ill have it fer ya tomorrow mornin
#899
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:28 PM
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
#900
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:35 PM
toxic rd said:
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
LOL!
Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.
Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
#901
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:44 PM
sirwilliam said:
It'd sure be nice to have a rookie like that on our team next year or the year after.
Maybe ...
BUTT!!!!
#902
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:51 PM
mball said:
toxic rd said:
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
LOL!
Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.
Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
#903
Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:58 PM
CCF4E said:
mball said:
toxic rd said:
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
LOL!
Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.
Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar
#904
Posted 07 March 2007 - 09:38 PM
toxic rd said:
CCF4E said:
mball said:
toxic rd said:
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
LOL!
Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.
Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar
haha AO is an idiot
#906
Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:00 PM
toxic rd said:
CCF4E said:
mball said:
toxic rd said:
From Alexander Ovechckin
Do you know what sarcasm is?
If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing?
But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.
Thanks.
LOL!
Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.
Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
#908
Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:45 PM
#909
Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:45 PM
carrotshirt said:
The Imposter said:
carrotshirt said:
No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.
Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.
What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.
#910
Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:08 PM
one night said:
carrotshirt said:
The Imposter said:
carrotshirt said:
No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.
Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.
What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.
Based on his offensive skills and the highlights I have seen from the RSL I honestly think Kolstov would be much better on the PP than Krajicek. I like Krajicek but Kolstov was meant to quarterback a PP.







MultiQuote









Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.