Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: 2009/2010 Prospects Thread - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2009/2010 Prospects Thread The ONLY "Official" one in existence

#901 User is online   jayRmichigan Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,632
  • Joined: 24-January 04

Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:44 PM

sirwilliam said:

Don't crucify me if this has been posted already... but I think it's interesting that Raymond's current numbers are comparable to Stastny's from last year.  

It'd sure be nice to have a rookie like that on our team next year or the year after.


Maybe ...








BUTT!!!!

QUOTE (Dominator_Hasek @ Apr 12 2009, 07:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I just love abortion!
0

#902 User is offline   CCF4E Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:51 PM

mball said:

toxic rd said:

WOW, best PM ever!:

From Alexander Ovechckin

Do you know what sarcasm is?

If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing? :lol:

But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.

Thanks.


LOL! :lol:

Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.

Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
OMG :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I think hes thinking of McHiver(sp) the goaltender we had last year....

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#903 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 08:58 PM

CCF4E said:

mball said:

toxic rd said:

WOW, best PM ever!:

From Alexander Ovechckin

Do you know what sarcasm is?

If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing? :lol:

But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.

Thanks.


LOL! :lol:

Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.

Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
OMG :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I think hes thinking of McHiver(sp) the goaltender we had last year....


Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#904 User is offline   __xxccnineteen Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,634
  • Joined: 15-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 09:38 PM

toxic rd said:

CCF4E said:

mball said:

toxic rd said:

WOW, best PM ever!:

From Alexander Ovechckin

Do you know what sarcasm is?

If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing? :lol:

But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.

Thanks.


LOL! :lol:

Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.

Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
OMG :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I think hes thinking of McHiver(sp) the goaltender we had last year....


Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar

haha AO is an idiot

^me on the sig.
... VISIT MY WEBSITE AT...
[[THIS LINK]].
for more sigs walls logos' etc!
0

#905 User is offline   hiroshima Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 16-January 07

Posted 07 March 2007 - 09:39 PM

simek get a injury in tonights game,hopefully nothing serious
0

#906 User is offline   CCF4E Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,913
  • Joined: 31-August 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:00 PM

toxic rd said:

CCF4E said:

mball said:

toxic rd said:

WOW, best PM ever!:

From Alexander Ovechckin

Do you know what sarcasm is?

If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing? :lol:

But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.

Thanks.


LOL! :lol:

Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.

Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
OMG :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I think hes thinking of McHiver(sp) the goaltender we had last year....


Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar
Yea i wasnt sure about the name...wow i butchered it :lol: :lol:

QUOTE (Rough Neck @ Aug 5 2007, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
:unsure: I got a boner from looking at a guy.. :unsure:

Props to S.Bernier for the Siggy
0

#907 User is offline   hiroshima Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 16-January 07

Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:04 PM

hopefully nothing serious.
0

#908 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:45 PM

Ellis loses 2-1 in OT to Stockton
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#909 User is offline   one night Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,592
  • Joined: 10-February 05

Posted 07 March 2007 - 10:45 PM

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.



What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.
0

#910 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:08 PM

one night said:

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.



What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.


Based on his offensive skills and the highlights I have seen from the RSL I honestly think Kolstov would be much better on the PP than Krajicek. I like Krajicek but Kolstov was meant to quarterback a PP.
0

#911 User is offline   VintageNaslund Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 13,077
  • Joined: 25-February 07

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:41 PM

grabner is amazing rite now with the chiefs
0

#912 User is offline   Blister Soul Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,889
  • Joined: 19-June 06

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:49 PM

CCF4E said:

toxic rd said:

CCF4E said:

mball said:

toxic rd said:

WOW, best PM ever!:

From Alexander Ovechckin

Do you know what sarcasm is?

If so then why would you think i put the Saborin thing? :lol:

But yeah i think McIver is okay but not as decent as Saboruin. So if you could remove me in your sig.

Thanks.


LOL! :lol:

Man, AO is a nice guy, but that's just too funny. It's kinda sad in a way. Can't believe he wouldn't go back and figure it out.

Anyways, AO if you're out there, McIver is a defenseman. You're thinking of Drew MacIntyre.
OMG :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I think hes thinking of McHiver(sp) the goaltender we had last year....


Wrong again, his name was Rob McVicar
Yea i wasnt sure about the name...wow i butchered it :lol: :lol:


Lol. Just. Lol.

Sig courtesy of Ømr7Ø

salome she's undressed to the nines
and although a few pounds fatter
she got pavlov's bells on her ankles and wrists
she coming at you with a platter
~ Bill Mallonee


Bill Mallonee Music
0

#913 User is offline   itzabreeze Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,502
  • Joined: 15-January 06

Posted 08 March 2007 - 12:36 AM

mball said:

one night said:

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.



What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.


Based on his offensive skills and the highlights I have seen from the RSL I honestly think Kolstov would be much better on the PP than Krajicek. I like Krajicek but Kolstov was meant to quarterback a PP.


But he's not going to be on the ice for just the PP only. Krajicek and him are both young D-man, that obviously are still developing. The question's remain that they both have PRO'S/CONS to them...

Kolstov Pro's:
-Great on the PP
-Good Speed
-Great skill with the puck

Krajicek Pro's:
-Cheap Salary
-Good Speed
-Humble, good in the room
-Many "good skills", that still need time to develop but does have a promising future ahead.

Kolstov Cons:
-More expensive (Were talking ATLEAST 1.1-1.3 Million to get him to NA)
-May/May not be a team "player", can be cocky and at times has been known to have an ego.
-Weak in down-low coverage
-The Unknown, how much has he REALLY improved since we last saw him, seeing 2-3 highlights doesn't really tell you s*** all.
-He could be expendable with the emergence of Bourdon,Edler, (pending a solid camp), and then if we resign Krajicek

Krajicek Cons:
-Weak down low (on coverage and needs to bulid up upper body strength)
-Was supposed to be a PP specialist but we have seen LITTLE of that, and don't say he hasn't been given the opportunity because he has.
-He could be expendable with the emergence of Bourdon,Edler, (pending a solid camp), and then if we sign Kolstov.


Kolstov Overall Impression: With the quotes that he has said "I want to play in the NHL next season", and how his game has improved (supposibly), I would be happy to see him on the roster, and up until last month would have said that he WOULD be on the roster in 2007-2008. BUT, the way Nonis talked about him, "we know someone's going to score when he's on the ice, we're just not sure what team", I don't know where he ranks currently on the Canucks "scouting department/future plans".



Krajicek Overall Impression:
I feel that he is a good quality player for his salary (625,000), and that their is alot of potential in him. I wonder is Nonis will go with him or Kolstov, because I don't believe their is going to be room for BOTH as one of the kids (Bourdon or Edler) WILL make the team out of camp and will be put in larger role getting 13-12 min of ice a game (a Nonis quote on how he wants to develop Luc ect ect).

Anyways, their is definitely lots of questions to be answered for next season.

- They say that everything happens for a reason - I'm still waiting - They say the good die young - I guess that's why you were chosen -
0

#914 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 08 March 2007 - 12:40 AM

Well if we can get a good young forward for them..
Posted Image
0

#915 User is offline   carrotshirt Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 674
  • Joined: 19-September 06

Posted 08 March 2007 - 01:25 AM

one night said:

carrotshirt said:

The Imposter said:

carrotshirt said:

Sounds like Koltsov's team in the RSL only has 2 regular season games left, then I'd assume there's some kind of playoffs after that, but does anyone know if he could come over to the Canucks when he's done there?


No, I don't even think we have a contract with him. Plus, we have plenty of d-men at the moment.


Yes we do have plenty of D men right now, but wouldn't it be nice if one of them wasn't Lukas? Koltsov sounds like he would be waaay better on the PP than Kraijeck.



What reason do you have to think Koltsov is waaay better, besides a bunch of kiddies here on CDC.


Gonna have to go with -mball here. From the video's I've seen, he has excellent puck control and passing, and will actually shoot. Last game was the first good shot Kraijeck took. He's had plenty of nice opportunities, with a good screen and an open lane, but he always passes off. How can you be an offensive defenceman that never shoots? I'd like to see Koltsov in a 'Nucks jersey. Obviously I can't say he'd definatley be better than Kraijeck until that happens, but it sure looks to be the case.
You are.
0

#916 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,866
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 08 March 2007 - 07:31 AM

A lot of what happens on the back end will depend on whether Salo and Sopel are resigned. You have to figure with the options Nonis has that he will trade some dmen for forward depth.
0

#917 User is offline   -mb Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 02-February 07

Posted 08 March 2007 - 08:37 AM

Great job breeze on the comparison. I was simply talking about the PP though. It's impossible to evaluate a player after seeing 2-3 highlights but you can see somethings. And from what I saw, his skating, passing and shooting looked great.

Anyways, like you said questions will be answered if and when Kolstov comes over.
0

#918 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 08 March 2007 - 10:08 AM

:evil:
Bjorkloven won their 2nd round series 2-1
So now if they get knocked out, he comes right to Manitoba
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

#919 User is offline   Wadim Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 168
  • Joined: 13-August 03

Posted 08 March 2007 - 12:42 PM

If Koltsov comes over and is used properly by Vigneault (No more then Krajicek's ES minutes + pretty mucht the full 2 of every powerplay) Then I'm sure that fans will LOVE Koltsov's cockiness. He scores highlight reel goals and he celebrates like mad. Notice how no one complains about Ovechkin? Cockiness for hockey players is a great thing since it means they're boasting with confidence.
0

#920 User is offline   Toxic Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Mod Alumni
  • Posts: 6,233
  • Joined: 25-June 06

Posted 08 March 2007 - 02:07 PM

Plus in such a great defensive system, Koltsov will either fix his mistakes by being surrounded by so many defensively responsible players, or his gaffs wont be as bad, considering 5 other players are on the ice who can easily make up for it, 5 including some goalie we have
QUOTE (Dave Chappelle)
You know why my show is good? Because the network officials say you're not smart enough to get what I'm doing, and every day I fight for you. I tell them how smart you are. Turns out, I was wrong. You people are stupid.
0

  • (387 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.