Canucks Community: Official: New Canucks Jerseys Thread - Canucks Community
Official: New Canucks Jerseys Thread August 29th, 12:30pm
#2203
Posted 20 August 2007 - 02:50 PM
NumbNucks, on Aug 20 2007, 01:25 PM, said:
Regardless of what the colours are its WONT look like a leafs of lightening jersey as we have DIFFRENT LOGO'S!!!! May be a new flash but LOGO'S are featured on every teams jersey.

#2204
Posted 20 August 2007 - 02:57 PM
unr3al, on Aug 20 2007, 02:43 PM, said:
guy, thats not the new jersey, thats the practice jersey they've been using this past few seasons. Naslund is in sweden, i doubt hes worn the jersey yet. its just an old picture of him at practice


1987-2008
R.I.P
#2205
Posted 20 August 2007 - 02:58 PM
Curtis Sanford, on Aug 20 2007, 05:02 PM, said:
Seriously??? PLEASE tell me you are joking.. like making fun of the people that come in here and ask questions that have been answered so many times over the past months.
And yes i know people dont want to read the WHOLE thread but like not even 2 pages back that was addressed for the thousanth time!!
No, The home jerseys will be DARK, confirmed LEAGUE WIDE, canucks cant just decide to use white as home because any visiting team will be white. Luongo is possibly wearing a blank jersey, If not then he is wearing the AWAY jersey, and yes they WOULD have the away jerseys at a photo shoot because it is a press photo shoot and would have to have people in BOTH types of jersies.

#2206
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:00 PM
This post has been edited by tzunino: 20 August 2007 - 03:06 PM
#2207
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:06 PM
Untouchable, on Aug 20 2007, 11:25 AM, said:
how would Naslund already wear the jersey and pose?
its a practice jersey. they're not marketing the practice jersey, they just put a picture of naslund. its soo obvious its the pracitce jersey.


1987-2008
R.I.P
#2209
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:12 PM
ezhik drochit, on Aug 20 2007, 03:08 PM, said:
http://www.trevorlow.../nux_leaked.gif
Yeah, we have all seen the comparaison between the 2
#2210
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:17 PM
snake1944, on Aug 20 2007, 02:57 PM, said:

Ya I agree. But my point remains that the home and away can be potentially be different. This whole thing is really quite annoying but I can't stop looking.
#2212
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:32 PM
NEW LOGO...(quickly pisspoorly done, but it helps explain a lot when all these "cellphone" leaks come into play as to why the logo looks blue and white)

I'm cresting it up as we speak, but the silver/grey is actually shiny metallic silver so it appears white under certain conditions while the lighter blue is shiny as well looking dark. Luomgo's sneak peak is right, but the homes are still primarily dark navy blue...
This post has been edited by RichardPeterNuss: 20 August 2007 - 03:34 PM
#2213
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:34 PM
RichardPeterNuss, on Aug 20 2007, 03:32 PM, said:
NEW LOGO...(quickly pisspoorly done, but it helps explain a lot when all these "cellphone" leaks come into play as to why the logo looks blue and white)

I will paypal you $1 if this is correct
#2215
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:45 PM
xtr3m, on Aug 20 2007, 11:54 AM, said:

This mask is almost the same as the one from the NHL 08 pic.
http://media.xbox360...mg_4684755.html
Someone had pointed out he was wearing that helmet a long time ago, can't remember when and I don't want to search for it. But as someone just pointed out, he changed the cage to blue, and it's blue in the video game, the only difference is the "1" and "V" on the chin.
This post has been edited by T-Linden: 20 August 2007 - 03:46 PM
#2217
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:48 PM
T-Linden, on Aug 20 2007, 03:45 PM, said:
http://media.xbox360...mg_4684755.html
Someone had pointed out he was wearing that helmet a long time ago, can't remember when and I don't want to search for it. But as someone just pointed out, he changed the cage to blue, and it's blue in the video game, the only difference is the "1" and "V" on the chin.
the only thing that looks changed on there is the blue cage.
good observation though as it looks like the logo's on the side of the helmet are gone.
And they aren't showing the top logo on the helmet so that could be changed aswell.
EDIT- actually I don't think the cage changed colors at all
This post has been edited by Vancouver_Canucks: 20 August 2007 - 03:55 PM
#2218
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:48 PM
RichardPeterNuss, on Aug 20 2007, 03:32 PM, said:
NEW LOGO...(quickly pisspoorly done, but it helps explain a lot when all these "cellphone" leaks come into play as to why the logo looks blue and white)

I'm cresting it up as we speak, but the silver/grey is actually shiny metallic silver so it appears white under certain conditions while the lighter blue is shiny as well looking dark. Luomgo's sneak peak is right, but the homes are still primarily dark navy blue...
Where did you see it (and I hope you used your own eyes?) If you are referring to the leaked draft hat logo, you have the white and silver reversed and there is no black.
#2219
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:52 PM
snake1944, on Aug 20 2007, 10:06 PM, said:
its a practice jersey. they're not marketing the practice jersey, they just put a picture of naslund. its soo obvious its the pracitce jersey.
Yup, it's so obvious that it's the practice jersey. Oh wait, ALL YOU CAN SEE IS THE FRIGGIN' SHOULDER. Seriously, just because it has piping on the shoulder doesn't mean it's the practice jersey, a lot of teams have/will have piping on the shoulder, because piping is one of the trademarks of Rbk's uniform design.
Secondly, they had a photoshoot with the jerseys on Aug. 1, how do you know Naslund wasn't there? In fact I think it'd be pretty important to have your captain there, considering how much promotional material these photos will probably be used for. Furthermore, even if Naslund wasn't there, why wouldn't the Canucks just use a photo of someone who was at the shoot actually wearing the jersey?
Everyone is just so paranoid, not everything is a big conspiracy ...
#2220
Posted 20 August 2007 - 03:54 PM
-Sleeper, on Aug 20 2007, 03:52 PM, said:
Secondly, they had a photoshoot with the jerseys on Aug. 1, how do you know Naslund wasn't there? In fact I think it'd be pretty important to have your captain there, considering how much promotional material these photos will probably be used for. Furthermore, even if Naslund wasn't there, why wouldn't the Canucks just use a photo of someone who was at the shoot actually wearing the jersey?
Everyone is just so paranoid, not everything is a big conspiracy ...
Because GM Place has no ice in it.
2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
- MSN/Bing







MultiQuote










Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.