-Sleeper, on Aug 20 2007, 03:52 PM, said:
Yup, it's so obvious that it's the practice jersey. Oh wait, ALL YOU CAN SEE IS THE FRIGGIN' SHOULDER. Seriously, just because it has piping on the shoulder doesn't mean it's the practice jersey, a lot of teams have/will have piping on the shoulder, because piping is one of the trademarks of Rbk's uniform design.
Secondly, they had a photoshoot with the jerseys on Aug. 1, how do you know Naslund wasn't there? In fact I think it'd be pretty important to have your captain there, considering how much promotional material these photos will probably be used for. Furthermore, even if Naslund wasn't there, why wouldn't the Canucks just use a photo of someone who was at the shoot actually wearing the jersey?
Everyone is just so paranoid, not everything is a big conspiracy ...
not everything is a big conspiracy? wtf is wrong with you bud.
Naslund was in a charity event in Sweden around the same time of the 'photoshoot'. He was not there.
It's pretty Obvious its a practice jersey, and with a little research u can find that picture on the internet somewhere.
They're not showing someone from the shoot, maybe cause they dont want to expose too much of it. That is the practice jersey. if not, then our new jersey is very similar in style and layout as our practice jersey.