Posted 03 August 2007 - 11:44 PM
THIS SO GOT MOVED FROM ITS OWN THREAD, DON'T BASH ABOUT LENGTH (IF YOU THINK IT'S TOO LONG, DON'T READ IT!!!)
honestly, i'm really not looking forward to the new jerseys. I prefer to savor as much as possible the sweet jerseys we have right now while they last. the orca, while some will argue is nothing more than a commercial logo based on orca bay, is a good mark for the team. whether anyone else agrees with me on that on this forum, i don't know. i feel the orca is a good representation of what someone is bound to remember after a trip to Vancouver. what do you see everywhere in YVR? what do you see in almost every other major public building? native artwork, which usually features the killer whale in some way. the haida are a part of the history of the area, and their artwork is a part of Vancouver culture no matter who argues it's not. you'd be blind not to see it.
as for the colours of the orca, they work much better than vintage colours. it IS a native style design, and those happen to be colours that are generally associated with common use in native artwork. just because green and blue represent the mountains and ocean, which are obviously symbols of the coast, doesn't mean they work well with everything, and it doesnt mean that any design you come up with that doesn't work with vintage colours is bad. the white and dark blue of the orca are natural colours for that style of drawing of the animal. the grey/silver and lighter blue work well because the whole idea of the picture is that the the animal is breaking out of ice. when you think of colours for ice, do you think green and blue? no, you think silver, grey, blue, and white. the two blues work very well in defining eachother, giving depth to the logo. the red i know is a sore spot for most people, but its my favorite part of the colour scheme. like i said before, the colour scheme is made up of what works with the picture and what are common colours used in native artwork. the red provides an amazingly effective contrast to what is entirely cool colours. red is a royal colour, its a symbol of authority and power, and it's a very warm, aggressive colour, especially placed with those select other colours. overall, the logo has depth, both visually and conceptually, and it provides jersesys which psychologically give the other team the impression of power and aggression. it works. and for all you vintage fans out there, they even had the stick in rink logo added as a shoulder patch! that in itself was a very good idea as that logo looks amazing in those colours.
don't get me wrong, i was entirely thrilled with the use of the vintage jersey as a third jersey last year. but even in the small amounts it was used, it got boring. however clever it is, the logo has almost nothing to it. it's boring. the colours themselves mean well, and they do work well with the stick in rink logo. mountains and ocean. sweet. but mountains and the ocean are not nearly as defining of the city of Vancouver as what will surely soon become known as the vintage orca logo. what everyone seems to forget is that they changed those jerseys for a very good reason: they were boring, tired, and passive. the vintage colours are nothing but very light, cool colours. they don't present a feeling of power, or even confidence. they do look nice together, but if this forum suddenly had those colours as their theme, i would be disgusted. as far as the orca in vintage colours is concerned, the green makes the whale look sick. what is the opposing team going to think looking at a team who are wearing a bunch of sick whales on their jerseys?
leaving my oppinion on the many other jerseys we have had out of this (it would take too long), i feel that changing what we had last year is a mistake. a sick, sick mistake. and i count down our final days with the best jerseys and logo we ever had. here's to another dynasty of flying V's.
as a side note, all of you out there hailing this new "modern" stick in rink logo, it's really, really ugly. it looks like a two year old drew it in microsoft paint. i'm sorry, but it really is the dumbest suggestion ive seen yet from all this jersey madness, and all because you saw a crappy drawing of the vintage stick in rink logo on a cartoon jersey worn by an anamorphic whale?
EDIT:
QUOTE(The_Pauser @ Aug 3 2007, 01:43 PM)
I'd like a johnny canuck type logo personally.
to put this to rest, johnny canuck is, and forever will be, a minor league worthy logo at best. it's something that much smaller leagues would use, and has no place in the NHL. reason? no one knows who it is. no one, besides those in Vancouver, cares. all they see is a lumberjack with a hockey stick, and for the same reason those awesome johnny canuck jerseys with him as the aviator looked, it brings about the wrong idea. you think, Vancouver Aviators. Vancouver Lumberjacks. it doesn't identify the team to the city, and even if we know who he was and that our name comes from him, I dare you to name me a team or fan of a team anywhere else in the NHL that would recognize what the hell we would be wearing.
6. Your signature image(s) will not exceed 400x200 pixels and your avatar will not exceed 80x80 pixels. The combined file size for avatars and signatures may not exceed 500 KB. Please limit additional text and quotes to one or two lines. Your signature may be removed without warning if it is found to be too big. Images that are larger than 400x200 or 500KB are inconsiderate to those unable to access the site with a high-speed connection. To check the size of your image, right click your image to view its properties. Vulgarity, inappropriate images, advertisements, and anything else contrary to the other rules, are not acceptable.