Canucks Community: Bourdon a Flop? - Canucks Community
Bourdon a Flop?
#1
Posted 20 September 2007 - 10:37 PM
http://sakicanavic.myminicity.com

thx DeadbeatRambo for sig
My Five
Sakic
Kovalchuk
Nash
Boyes
Mcdonald
#2
Posted 20 September 2007 - 10:39 PM
Hopefully he can be a top 4 player for the Canucks in 5 years
If he fails at that level than he will be a Jason Doig lol
This post has been edited by Bobby Lu Fan: 20 September 2007 - 10:41 PM

Sig by 14Burrows
#3
Posted 20 September 2007 - 10:45 PM
He didn't handle some passes cleanly, but that's nervousness more than a divot on his skill.
Hey, Schneider allowed 2 goals on 4 shots. Let's rag on him! Lay off Bourdon, just let him be for now.
#4
Posted 20 September 2007 - 10:50 PM
Kraicjek played a great game today btw as the veteran on the blue line.

Sig by 14Burrows
#9
Posted 20 September 2007 - 11:42 PM
http://crackle.com/P...2...&id=2465685
http://www.youtube.c...re=channel_page
http://www.youtube.c...re=channel_page
http://www.youtube.c...re=channel_page
http://www.youtube.c...re=channel_page
http://www.youtube.c...A..._page"
DON'T STOP BELIEVING CANUCKS FANS!!
GO CANUCKS GO!! GO CANUCKS GO!! GO CANUCKS GO!!
My Original Wishlist:
Jussi Jokinen, Chad Larose, Chris Kunitz (gotta check back on the ones i missed.)
NEW WISH LIST:
Antropov
Beauchemin
Rob Neidermayer
Kovalev
Heatley
Barker
#11
Posted 21 September 2007 - 12:49 AM
#14
Posted 21 September 2007 - 09:53 AM
Jkhol, on Sep 21 2007, 04:31 AM, said:
No, we should have drafted Kopitar because he was a very talented center with size, something we needed in the system far more than a defenseman. I'd have been happy if we'd taken Kopitar and he was developing slowly, instead of Bourdon developing slowly. Center needed more depth than defense needed in our system.
#16
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:06 AM
Jester@wraiths.org, on Sep 21 2007, 09:53 AM, said:
Hrmmm, yes, well you're WRONG
That was during the WCE era, we had PLENTY of offense, at the time it looked like we'd have Bert Mo and Nazzy long-term, we could draft a C later. At the time we had a crappy D, Jovo was gonna be gone soon and we had no leader on the D, and no real hard nosed heart and soul guys on the backend. Bourdon was big, fast, hard nosed, offensively talented, hard hitting, and a leader. It was perfect.
Top-pairing offensive, nasty canadian d-men are alot harder to come by then gifted offensive C's
#17
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:32 AM
toxic rd, on Sep 21 2007, 10:06 AM, said:
That was during the WCE era, we had PLENTY of offense, at the time it looked like we'd have Bert Mo and Nazzy long-term, we could draft a C later. At the time we had a crappy D, Jovo was gonna be gone soon and we had no leader on the D, and no real hard nosed heart and soul guys on the backend. Bourdon was big, fast, hard nosed, offensively talented, hard hitting, and a leader. It was perfect.
Top-pairing offensive, nasty canadian d-men are alot harder to come by then gifted offensive C's
No, not really. Yes, the big club had WCE, but did you notice that I said our system? We didn't have and still don't have, solid center prospects. Our D on the big club at the time, had Ohlund, Salo, and Jovo. Prospects in our system such as Koltsov (at the time, a higher likely hood of getting here), Bieksa had just had a very solid AHL season (lots of goals, assists, PM's, and respectable +/- ), Bryan Allen developing...
Obviously, drafting is with the future in mind, so looking beyond the WCE would have made sense...
Center has been the weak point in our development system for... forever?
But don't misunderstand me anyone, I'm not judging Bourdon a flop, just saying, in my view, drafting him wasn't addressing what has been an ongoing need of the franchise for most of it's existence.
This post has been edited by Jester@wraiths.org: 21 September 2007 - 10:38 AM
#18
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:44 AM
s got to prove he can play Defence outside of the QMJHL. Bourdon probably had his best game as a Canuck tonight in many ways. Fans should see his quiet performance as a real positive.
#19
Posted 21 September 2007 - 10:55 AM
Section116, on Sep 21 2007, 10:44 AM, said:
Definitely.
Previously, it's seemed that he had been wanting to do too much, and end up not doing anything well. Hopefully he's realizing he needs to simplify what he's doing and let things happen. Just look to play sound defensively first at this level, and his natural talent for offense will emerge on it's own.





MultiQuote


Double the trouble.






Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.