Canucks Community: head have got to roll - Canucks Community
head have got to roll nt
#1
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:36 PM
It was injury's last yr and it is the same this year(luongo +)
what excuse are we going to have when we don't make the playoffs.
AV has got to go and maybe even gillis
thanks danny
#2
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:42 PM


SD94'S 2009/10 CANUCKS PROPOSAL
D. Sedin - H. Sedin - M. Samuelsson [SIGNED BY VAN]
A. Burrows - R. Kesler - P. Demitra
M. Raymond - C. Hodgson/K.Wellwood - S. Bernier
D. Hordichuk - R. Johnson - R. Rypien
W. Mitchell - S. Salo
A. Edler - K. Foster
K. Bieksa - S. O'Brien [SIGNED BY VAN]
R. Luongo
A. Raycroft [SIGNED BY VAN]
#4
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:43 PM
I am SOOO TIRED of this crappy team, all of the losing and being a cannots fan in general.
This crap HAS TO STOP, we are the laughing stock of the NHL, we just let anybody stomp on our faces ANYTIME they want.
#6
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:45 PM
MATS SUNDIN, on Jan 13 2009, 10:41 PM, said:
and how can you mention gillis? on paper this team is incredible...
your an idiot...
While I agree with you, don't call someone an idiot and simultaneously prove that you're one too.
#7
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:47 PM
PuckMaestro, on Jan 13 2009, 10:43 PM, said:
I am SOOO TIRED of this crappy team, all of the losing and being a cannots fan in general.
This crap HAS TO STOP, we are the laughing stock of the NHL, we just let anybody stomp on our faces ANYTIME they want.
Detroit is that way ---------------->
#8
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:47 PM
EDIT: Nevermind it's too big.
This post has been edited by Vestigex7: 13 January 2009 - 11:48 PM
#9
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:49 PM

#10
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:52 PM
danny411, on Jan 13 2009, 11:36 PM, said:
It was injury's last yr and it is the same this year(luongo +)
what excuse are we going to have when we don't make the playoffs.
AV has got to go and maybe even gillis
thanks danny
What? he's done almost more in less than a year as GM then Nonis did in his whole time here, no this isn't on Gillis, and i'm not ready to blame AV completely i'll let him get a healthy team and see what he does

Mats Froshaug Norway's Marathon Man
#11
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:55 PM
#13
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:03 AM
MATS SUNDIN, on Jan 14 2009, 12:41 AM, said:
and how can you mention gillis? on paper this team is incredible...
your an idiot...
incredible ?
we have two 80 pt guys and luongo
what incredible about that ?
We don't even have luongo now.
Alot of people think are team is antiquated. Our defense is slow and immobile. They move the puck so slow. Our top 6 is no cup of tea either. Sedin sedin demitra is ok. Sundin welly and whoever is very poor till sundin comes around and drags his linemates on his back. But that might not happen for at least another 10-20 games.
where do u see the great team on paper ?
Get real the team is under 500 without luongo. That's what they are a less than mediocre team who are not good enough to make the playoffs.
We all new it at the beginning of the year. But we hoped luongo could save the day. Now we got Sundin to save the day.
so how am i an idiot.
Im saying they are not going very far with av or gillis
#15
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:15 AM
BOwnness has no voice left so yell at me! bleeech yellin dont help!
Goalie in the NHL who wants that gig if the're not crazy. Pucks bounce ice is slippery. Stuff happens they try.
Hey don't be a weakling stand by you're team Johnson is back, Lou's back, Salo's back, Pyat's back.
The only heads that rolled tonite was the coaches and the fans man. And we and they deserved it. ANd how Bandwagonfreeks. Nuks Said.
Injuries, schedual, new players, returning players, new goalie, another new goalie another new goily, this team needs the middle of JAnuary bad!
Nice few days off. SOme good practice time. Time with people that love them.
Hey! they have already had a good swift kick in the nards.
Five in a row lost is a cure for some pain my fellow fansters!
I still saya money CUp Run and STANLEY WIN for this team !
The players ... they got the goods.
I'm IN!
#16
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:18 AM
danny411, on Jan 13 2009, 11:03 PM, said:
we have two 80 pt guys and luongo
what incredible about that ?
We don't even have luongo now.
Alot of people think are team is antiquated. Our defense is slow and immobile. They move the puck so slow. Our top 6 is no cup of tea either. Sedin sedin demitra is ok. Sundin welly and whoever is very poor till sundin comes around and drags his linemates on his back. But that might not happen for at least another 10-20 games.
where do u see the great team on paper ?
Get real the team is under 500 without luongo. That's what they are a less than mediocre team who are not good enough to make the playoffs.
We all new it at the beginning of the year. But we hoped luongo could save the day. Now we got Sundin to save the day.
so how am i an idiot.
Im saying they are not going very far with av or gillis
Wow, pretty much every point in this post is just plain wrong.
1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.
Man up Princess.
#17
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:21 AM
BORIS, on Jan 13 2009, 11:18 PM, said:
1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.
Man up Princess.
ohhh, you gonna take that princess?
#18
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:21 AM
BORIS, on Jan 13 2009, 11:18 PM, said:
1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.
Man up Princess.
Man Up!
#19
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:23 AM
I just saw AV post game and he is kissing up to the players now " I believe in these guys blah, blah,..." the day after he skated their bags off.
I think he sees the writing on the wall.
#20
Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:30 AM
barbie, on Jan 13 2009, 10:56 PM, said:
You have CAKE on your dress COMPLACENT Barbie.
Whoever the HELL auntie flo is, she doesn't care about Hockey or Winning ......................... just like you.
You should either think before you post or NOT POST AT ALL.
This post has been edited by PuckMaestro: 14 January 2009 - 12:39 AM






MultiQuote









Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.