Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: head have got to roll - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

head have got to roll nt

#1 User is offline   danny411 Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:36 PM

This team is going down just like last year.

It was injury's last yr and it is the same this year(luongo +)

what excuse are we going to have when we don't make the playoffs.

AV has got to go and maybe even gillis

thanks danny
Thanks willie Mitchell for the birthday present.

http://www.gifsoup.c...hit-toews-s.gif
0

#2 User is offline   sd94. Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,098
  • Joined: 08-April 07

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:42 PM

AV yes... MG, frack no. if the team misses the playoffs, I think MG knows exactly what he's gonna do, same as if they do have success.
deviant.art. || game.walk.thru.


SD94'S 2009/10 CANUCKS PROPOSAL
D. Sedin - H. Sedin - M. Samuelsson [SIGNED BY VAN]
A. Burrows - R. Kesler - P. Demitra
M. Raymond - C. Hodgson/K.Wellwood - S. Bernier
D. Hordichuk - R. Johnson - R. Rypien

W. Mitchell - S. Salo
A. Edler - K. Foster
K. Bieksa - S. O'Brien [SIGNED BY VAN]

R. Luongo
A. Raycroft [SIGNED BY VAN]
0

#3 User is offline   Archon Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 12,636
  • Joined: 22-September 04

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:43 PM

EDIT: Nevermind. Not in the mood for a drive-by tonight.

This post has been edited by Flamer23: 13 January 2009 - 11:43 PM

0

#4 User is offline   PuckMaestro Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 28-January 07

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:43 PM

This joke of a team is comprised of incompetent, unmotivated, unskilled, uncompetitive LOSERS.

I am SOOO TIRED of this crappy team, all of the losing and being a cannots fan in general.

This crap HAS TO STOP, we are the laughing stock of the NHL, we just let anybody stomp on our faces ANYTIME they want.
0

#5 User is offline   NuckLife1714 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 723
  • Joined: 30-September 08

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:44 PM

bandwagon much?
I collect Berries.
0

#6 User is offline   canucks_fan_17 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 167
  • Joined: 09-October 08

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:45 PM

View PostMATS SUNDIN, on Jan 13 2009, 10:41 PM, said:

bandwagon???... adversity makes a team stronger.... they'll get through it..

and how can you mention gillis? on paper this team is incredible...

your an idiot...


While I agree with you, don't call someone an idiot and simultaneously prove that you're one too.
0

#7 User is offline   TRIPP3D Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,333
  • Joined: 01-April 08

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:47 PM

View PostPuckMaestro, on Jan 13 2009, 10:43 PM, said:

This joke of a team is comprised of incompetent, unmotivated, unskilled, uncompetitive LOSERS.

I am SOOO TIRED of this crappy team, all of the losing and being a cannots fan in general.

This crap HAS TO STOP, we are the laughing stock of the NHL, we just let anybody stomp on our faces ANYTIME they want.


Detroit is that way ---------------->
0

#8 User is offline   Vestigex7 Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,920
  • Joined: 26-April 07

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:47 PM

I'm sigging this just because you have "thanks danny" at the end.

EDIT: Nevermind it's too big.

This post has been edited by Vestigex7: 13 January 2009 - 11:48 PM

0

#9 User is offline   Sam Brodeur-Roy Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,457
  • Joined: 26-November 03

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:49 PM

I don't think MG is the one to blame. He did put together a great crew. But just like Nonis, and Burke before him, the players themselves, no matter who they are, somehow finds a way to underachieve overall and piss us off, as if the Canucks fans collectively insulted all of the players' families year after year or something.

QUOTE (suolucidir @ Apr 2 2009, 02:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think this forum needs more people pretending to be stupid. There obviously aren't enough genuinely stupid people around.
0

#10 User is offline   CaNUCKlehead973 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: 30-September 08

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:52 PM

View Postdanny411, on Jan 13 2009, 11:36 PM, said:

This team is going down just like last year.

It was injury's last yr and it is the same this year(luongo +)

what excuse are we going to have when we don't make the playoffs.

AV has got to go and maybe even gillis

thanks danny

What? he's done almost more in less than a year as GM then Nonis did in his whole time here, no this isn't on Gillis, and i'm not ready to blame AV completely i'll let him get a healthy team and see what he does


Mats Froshaug Norway's Marathon Man
0

#11 User is offline   donutz0r Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,084
  • Joined: 07-January 08

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:55 PM

View Postdanny411, on Jan 14 2009, 12:36 AM, said:

This team is going down just like last year.

It was injury's last yr and it is the same this year(luongo +)

what excuse are we going to have when we don't make the playoffs.

AV has got to go and maybe even gillis

thanks danny

Imbecile.
0

#12 User is offline   dhabums23 Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,374
  • Joined: 08-January 09

Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:56 PM

View PostPuckMaestro, on Jan 13 2009, 10:43 PM, said:

This crap HAS TO STOP, we are the laughing stock of the NHL, we just let anybody stomp on our faces ANYTIME they want.


Auntie Flo visiting again?
Your post is probably stupid.
0

#13 User is offline   danny411 Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Joined: 08-August 05

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:03 AM

View PostMATS SUNDIN, on Jan 14 2009, 12:41 AM, said:

bandwagon???... adversity makes a team stronger.... they'll get through it..

and how can you mention gillis? on paper this team is incredible...

your an idiot...



incredible ?

we have two 80 pt guys and luongo

what incredible about that ?

We don't even have luongo now.

Alot of people think are team is antiquated. Our defense is slow and immobile. They move the puck so slow. Our top 6 is no cup of tea either. Sedin sedin demitra is ok. Sundin welly and whoever is very poor till sundin comes around and drags his linemates on his back. But that might not happen for at least another 10-20 games.

where do u see the great team on paper ?

Get real the team is under 500 without luongo. That's what they are a less than mediocre team who are not good enough to make the playoffs.

We all new it at the beginning of the year. But we hoped luongo could save the day. Now we got Sundin to save the day.

so how am i an idiot.

Im saying they are not going very far with av or gillis
Thanks willie Mitchell for the birthday present.

http://www.gifsoup.c...hit-toews-s.gif
0

#14 User is offline   vinvan Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 746
  • Joined: 10-January 09

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:04 AM

View Postbarbie, on Jan 13 2009, 11:56 PM, said:

Auntie Flo visiting again?


Still... LMAO
Posted Imagecanadian war memorial (France)
0

#15 User is offline   the White Sheet Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 600
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:15 AM

Meh! Whatever goooood loss ...Take a chil pill brothers and sisters.
BOwnness has no voice left so yell at me! bleeech yellin dont help!
Goalie in the NHL who wants that gig if the're not crazy. Pucks bounce ice is slippery. Stuff happens they try.
Hey don't be a weakling stand by you're team Johnson is back, Lou's back, Salo's back, Pyat's back.
The only heads that rolled tonite was the coaches and the fans man. And we and they deserved it. ANd how Bandwagonfreeks. Nuks Said.
Injuries, schedual, new players, returning players, new goalie, another new goalie another new goily, this team needs the middle of JAnuary bad!
Nice few days off. SOme good practice time. Time with people that love them.
Hey! they have already had a good swift kick in the nards.
Five in a row lost is a cure for some pain my fellow fansters!
I still saya money CUp Run and STANLEY WIN for this team !

The players ... they got the goods.
I'm IN!
0

#16 User is offline   BORIS Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 482
  • Joined: 08-October 06

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:18 AM

View Postdanny411, on Jan 13 2009, 11:03 PM, said:

incredible ?

we have two 80 pt guys and luongo

what incredible about that ?

We don't even have luongo now.

Alot of people think are team is antiquated. Our defense is slow and immobile. They move the puck so slow. Our top 6 is no cup of tea either. Sedin sedin demitra is ok. Sundin welly and whoever is very poor till sundin comes around and drags his linemates on his back. But that might not happen for at least another 10-20 games.

where do u see the great team on paper ?

Get real the team is under 500 without luongo. That's what they are a less than mediocre team who are not good enough to make the playoffs.

We all new it at the beginning of the year. But we hoped luongo could save the day. Now we got Sundin to save the day.

so how am i an idiot.

Im saying they are not going very far with av or gillis


Wow, pretty much every point in this post is just plain wrong.

1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.

Man up Princess.
0

#17 User is offline   Bure-pound for pound Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,583
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:21 AM

View PostBORIS, on Jan 13 2009, 11:18 PM, said:

Wow, pretty much every point in this post is just plain wrong.

1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.

Man up Princess.

ohhh, you gonna take that princess?
0

#18 User is offline   Vestigex7 Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,920
  • Joined: 26-April 07

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:21 AM

View PostBORIS, on Jan 13 2009, 11:18 PM, said:

Wow, pretty much every point in this post is just plain wrong.

1. We have 3 80-point guys if you include Sundin (I do).
2. Our team is antiquated? Do you even know what that means? While not as young as Chicago or Phoenix, our only old player is Sundin. Everyone else has a good 4+ years left in the NHL.
3. I'll agree with the point about immobile defence, although we are minus Salo. Just be thankful our D are not as offensively challenged as Atlanta, Calgary, Colorado, Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Columbus, etc etc
4. Our top 6 are average right now, good once (not if) Sundin steps up his game.
5. So you think this is a terrible team. OK. They have played terrible in the last week, whilst using 2nd and 3rd string goaltenders. Last time I checked the season is more than a week long, and Luongo is due to return, oh, in 2 days.

Man up Princess.


Man Up!
0

#19 User is offline   big-target Icon


  • Salmon Kings Star
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 71
  • Joined: 13-March 07

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:23 AM

The way we are slidding down the standings we can't wait for long before something has to be done. I say give AV till the end of Jan, if the team hasn't improved after Lui is back for a few games then I think AV has to go.

I just saw AV post game and he is kissing up to the players now " I believe in these guys blah, blah,..." the day after he skated their bags off.

I think he sees the writing on the wall.
0

#20 User is offline   PuckMaestro Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,909
  • Joined: 28-January 07

Posted 14 January 2009 - 12:30 AM

View Postbarbie, on Jan 13 2009, 10:56 PM, said:

Auntie Flo visiting again?



You have CAKE on your dress COMPLACENT Barbie.

Whoever the HELL auntie flo is, she doesn't care about Hockey or Winning ......................... just like you.

You should either think before you post or NOT POST AT ALL.

This post has been edited by PuckMaestro: 14 January 2009 - 12:39 AM

0

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.