This topic is locked
Who would you like with our 1st and 2nd round picks (10th and 40th overall at this point in time)
Canucks Community: February 2009 Draft Poll - Canucks Community
February 2009 Draft Poll
MultiQuote
#2
- Canucks Regular
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,770
- Joined: 27-February 07
Posted 02 February 2009 - 06:51 PM
timw33, on Feb 2 2009, 05:43 PM, said:
Who would you like with our 1st and 2nd round picks (10th and 40th overall at this point in time)
I'm not as sure about the second round but Ellis or Kulikov would be nice unless someone falls lower.
#3
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,866
- Joined: 21-July 07
Posted 02 February 2009 - 06:54 PM
2nd round only lets you choose 1, and Josefson is on twice.
Any top 9 player. Maybe.... umm Schroeder? or move up for someone like Braydon Schenn....
Ellis
Kassian
Despres
Glennie
Doherty (I just don't think you can pass on a 6'8 dman, especially considering when he enters the league our best defensive dman will be exiting)
Any top 9 player. Maybe.... umm Schroeder? or move up for someone like Braydon Schenn....
Ellis
Kassian
Despres
Glennie
Doherty (I just don't think you can pass on a 6'8 dman, especially considering when he enters the league our best defensive dman will be exiting)
This post has been edited by FrodoTeabaggins: 02 February 2009 - 08:22 PM
#5
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,669
- Joined: 26-January 09
Posted 02 February 2009 - 07:04 PM
Ryan Ellis first round then Ryan Howse all the way. P.G. boy all the way, that would be awesome!
PS: Chris 21 it's obviously based on actual picks that the Canucks might make. That's why Hedman isn't on there either.
PS: Chris 21 it's obviously based on actual picks that the Canucks might make. That's why Hedman isn't on there either.
#6
- Canucks Regular
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,683
- Joined: 20-February 08
Posted 02 February 2009 - 07:05 PM
Ellis FTW
Thanks For The Sig Vogue
2,000 Post June/13/09
R.I.P Luc Bourdon,Micheal Jackson,Billy Mays Never Click Here!
Formerly known as S.Bernier.18
#9
- Manitoba Moose Star
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 625
- Joined: 25-April 08
Posted 02 February 2009 - 07:14 PM
Ellis & Barrie
QUOTE (Abaddon @ Aug 20 2009, 01:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I know some people are saying Cody Hodgson could be a bust but I think he had a great last year and could win it all for us so is there a chance he plays in the Olympics in front of the Vancouver crowd?
I think the best linemates for himw ould be Simon Gagne and maybe Mike Richards because they play similar styles.
I think the best linemates for himw ould be Simon Gagne and maybe Mike Richards because they play similar styles.
QUOTE (Tank Hankerous @ Aug 20 2009, 02:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why don't you just come out and say it? You want to have sex with Cody Hodgson.
QUOTE (100%_Sober @ Aug 20 2009, 02:28 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hockey Canads rewards players who do well at the international level. Hodgson was the best player at the WJC and has NHL all star skill already.
I don't think its to far fetched.
I'd rate the odds at 40/60 that Hodgson makes Team Canada.
I don't think its to far fetched.
I'd rate the odds at 40/60 that Hodgson makes Team Canada.
QUOTE (Raging Wookies @ Aug 20 2009, 02:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'd rate the odds at 90/10 that you were dropped on your heard multiple times as a child.
QUOTE (StealthNuck @ Aug 23 2009, 04:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm looking forward to you going back to school. Have a wonderful grade 5.
#10
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,175
- Joined: 27-November 05
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:08 PM
1st round
Any top 9 that falls
Glennie (who could go before Schenn)
Depres
Kulikov
Ellis
Close behing Rundblad, & Kadri
2nd round
Olsen
Doherty
Ekman-Larsson
Erixon
Howse
and hope McNabb falls to the 3rd round he could be the next Shea Weber
As you can see, i think this team needs prospects on D, I would like to get Kassian or Rundblad/ Elliot if we (this current canucks team) starts playing to its potential and we get a pick around 16-22, I dont think Kassian is worth a a top 10.
However I could O'Reilly also being there at the 40th pick in the 2nd round rather than top 10 in the first, and he would top my list for the 2nd round (if we draft a d-man in teh 1st).
Any top 9 that falls
Glennie (who could go before Schenn)
Depres
Kulikov
Ellis
Close behing Rundblad, & Kadri
2nd round
Olsen
Doherty
Ekman-Larsson
Erixon
Howse
and hope McNabb falls to the 3rd round he could be the next Shea Weber
As you can see, i think this team needs prospects on D, I would like to get Kassian or Rundblad/ Elliot if we (this current canucks team) starts playing to its potential and we get a pick around 16-22, I dont think Kassian is worth a a top 10.
However I could O'Reilly also being there at the 40th pick in the 2nd round rather than top 10 in the first, and he would top my list for the 2nd round (if we draft a d-man in teh 1st).
#11
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,175
- Joined: 27-November 05
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:10 PM
ovx_211, on Feb 2 2009, 07:07 PM, said:
1st Round = Ryan Ellis
2nd Round = Taylor Doherty
2nd Round = Taylor Doherty
I like this it looks like the Sabres first 2 picks from this season Ennis = Ellis, Doherty = Myers. I dont like the idea of drafting Ellis and Barrie, you dont want to of the same type smallish guys, too easy to play against.
#13
- Manitoba Moose Star
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 804
- Joined: 13-January 08
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:20 PM
Ryan Ellis, Zach Kassian for first round OR Who ever drops down to us.
Taylor Doherty and Thomas Tatar for 2nd.
Taylor Doherty and Thomas Tatar for 2nd.
MG!! PLAY GRABNER AND HANSEN FOR NEXT SEASON!
GOOD LUCK NASLUND IN NEW YORK!
SEDINS PWN !
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=GE0vVA3uXAg[/b]
GOOD LUCK NASLUND IN NEW YORK!
SEDINS PWN !
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=GE0vVA3uXAg[/b]
#14
- Canucks Hall-of-Famer
-
- Group: Community Moderator
- Posts: 26,710
- Joined: 24-August 06
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:23 PM
I pray that one of the awesome top 9 prospects drop to us like they did last year (Hodgson).
And hopefully we can acquire additional second round picks, some really good prospects will be there.
And hopefully we can acquire additional second round picks, some really good prospects will be there.
#15
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,673
- Joined: 25-April 08
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:45 PM
First Round:
Ryan Ellis
Scott Glennie
Zack Kassian
Stefan Elliot
Peter Holland
Close -> Rundblad
Second Round:
Tyson Barrie
Toni Rajala
Brayden McNabb
Jimmy Bubnick
Taylor Doherty
Close->Zach Budish, Tomas Tatar.
Ryan Ellis
Scott Glennie
Zack Kassian
Stefan Elliot
Peter Holland
Close -> Rundblad
Second Round:
Tyson Barrie
Toni Rajala
Brayden McNabb
Jimmy Bubnick
Taylor Doherty
Close->Zach Budish, Tomas Tatar.
Marian Gaborik = Marian Glassorik
Welcome Jordan Schroeder!
^ Please No!
Welcome Jordan Schroeder!
QUOTE (King of Anarchy @ Sep 13 2009, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If he (Hodgson) doesn't make the team, I will post a video of myself masturbating.
^ Please No!
#16
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,626
- Joined: 26-February 07
Posted 02 February 2009 - 08:50 PM
Chris21, on Feb 2 2009, 06:57 PM, said:
weres tavares
I think they are assuming he will go #1, and at pick #10, we have pretty much no chance to land him
"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot." - George Orwell
.
#18
- Manitoba Moose Star
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 658
- Joined: 13-August 07
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:10 PM
timw33, on Feb 2 2009, 07:23 PM, said:
I pray that one of the awesome top 9 prospects drop to us like they did last year (Hodgson).
And hopefully we can acquire additional second round picks, some really good prospects will be there.
And hopefully we can acquire additional second round picks, some really good prospects will be there.
The rate things are going we're going to end up with a far better pick than 10th.
If the Canucks pick Ray's kid Landon we'll never hear the end of it on 1040.
QUOTE (Vlad the Impaler @ Oct 26 2009, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Well, when two people love each other very much, bees do stuff to each other like rabbits, and you get dropped babies who grow up to be the OP. What was the question again?
QUOTE (in canucks god trusts @ Jan 31 2009, 01:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ok seriously wtf is up with us, like is it even realistic for us to win or is winning a myth to the canucks. we need to win todays game or it will be a myth.
#19
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,175
- Joined: 27-November 05
Posted 02 February 2009 - 09:18 PM
jc4004, on Feb 2 2009, 10:10 PM, said:
The rate things are going we're going to end up with a far better pick than 10th.
If the Canucks pick Ray's kid Landon we'll never hear the end of it on 1040.
If the Canucks pick Ray's kid Landon we'll never hear the end of it on 1040.
Im not sure if people are paying attention that this draft poll is assuming we have the 10th pick....6 people out of 28 think we should draft Ferraro @ 10, that would be a terrible pick at 10 with the wealth of players who would still be available IMO.
#20
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,673
- Joined: 25-April 08
Posted 02 February 2009 - 10:04 PM
ilikecanucks, on Feb 2 2009, 09:18 PM, said:
Im not sure if people are paying attention that this draft poll is assuming we have the 10th pick....6 people out of 28 think we should draft Ferraro @ 10, that would be a terrible pick at 10 with the wealth of players who would still be available IMO.
IMO the earliest Ferraro should be picked is 20, I think he is a second rounder personally.
Marian Gaborik = Marian Glassorik
Welcome Jordan Schroeder!
^ Please No!
Welcome Jordan Schroeder!
QUOTE (King of Anarchy @ Sep 13 2009, 04:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If he (Hodgson) doesn't make the team, I will post a video of myself masturbating.
^ Please No!
Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.