Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Jordan Schroeder Talk


  • Please log in to reply
3141 replies to this topic

#91 fogducker

fogducker

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,542 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 05

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:28 PM

I'm pretty sure that it's a 2009 2nd Round Pick and a 2010 3rd Round Pick


I believe that's a false statement. All sources, including the canucks.com homepage have Vancouver listed with the 53rd pick.
  • 0
Stephane Auger is a prick. Patrick Kane is a small prick.

#92 Hafizzle

Hafizzle

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,700 posts
  • Joined: 14-April 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:29 PM

We don't have a 2nd Round Pick this year, Buffalo has it.


Main page of CDC is showing we do have a 2nd round pick. 53rd overall.
  • 0

#93 MattDuchene9

MattDuchene9

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 807 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:29 PM

I'm pretty sure that it's a 2009 2nd Round Pick and a 2010 3rd Round Pick


They got LA's third this year and our 2nd in 2010
  • 0
MG!! PLAY GRABNER AND HANSEN FOR NEXT SEASON!
GOOD LUCK NASLUND IN NEW YORK!
SEDINS PWN !

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=GE0vVA3uXAg[/b]

#94 sirensong87

sirensong87

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts
  • Joined: 13-December 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:39 PM

I'm pretty sure that it's a 2009 2nd Round Pick and a 2010 3rd Round Pick


You sir are wrong, we have the 53rd. Buffalo has La's 3rd from us this year and our 2nd next year.
  • 0

#95 wolfgang puck

wolfgang puck

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 317 posts
  • Joined: 28-April 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:47 PM

Schroeder had success in University and in the WJC playing with big wingers (Stoa and Barribell in Minny,JVR and Colin Wilson on Team USA).Maybe we can use another early round pick to nab someone in that mold if there's one available.Alex Chaisson #46 on TSN ranking or another Minnesota native,Ben Hanowski,could be had with a third rounder.
  • 0

#96 Marian Hossa

Marian Hossa

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 868 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:49 PM

I went out to Critical Mass and during a break, I called home and heard about the pick. I was like "OMG HE DROPPED!"

Very excited to have him as a future member of our team.
  • 0

Credit to ninja321

#97 stawns

stawns

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,895 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 03

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:50 PM

Gillis stated in an interview that Jordan Schroder was in their top 10 list!


Omg get ready for the prospect games....

Grabner, Hodgson, Schroder, oberg, shirokov.... and more



You won't see Schroedr anywhere near the organization unti he finished college, or decides to quit school.
  • 0

#98 b3.

b3.

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Assistant to Regional Manager
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,532 posts
  • Joined: 04-March 07

Posted 26 June 2009 - 09:51 PM

I believe that's a false statement. All sources, including the canucks.com homepage have Vancouver listed with the 53rd pick.



Main page of CDC is showing we do have a 2nd round pick. 53rd overall.



You sir are wrong, we have the 53rd. Buffalo has La's 3rd from us this year and our 2nd next year.


Sportsnet is wrong:

The Sabres get Vancouver's second-round pick in 2009 and third-rounder in 2010.

LINK: http://www.sportsnet...anucks_bernier/

But I will gladly take a 2nd Round Pick.

Edited by bieksa3-, 26 June 2009 - 09:53 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#99 Nuxin07

Nuxin07

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,663 posts
  • Joined: 11-September 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:04 PM

I love this pick! What a steal at 22nd!! IN GILLIS WE TRUST!!!
  • 0
"No I don't think we need one designated guy to only come out against a guy who plays 3 minutes a game and watches Pinky & the Brain." - Alain Vigneault

"When you take out a guy wearing the C for a team north of the border, that's like whacking a made guy in the mob. You just don't do it." - Ross Bernstein, author of "The Code: The Unwritten Rules of Fighting and Retaliation in the NHL", regarding Steve Moore's hit on Markus Naslund.

RIP Luc Bourdon 1987-2008

#100 Your Mother

Your Mother

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • Joined: 10-January 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:09 PM

the only knock on schroeder is that he is small, but small guys can succeed in this NHL. just look at guys like gionta and cammalleri.
  • 0

#101 luongo55

luongo55

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,932 posts
  • Joined: 16-December 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:12 PM

the only knock on schroeder is that he is small, but small guys can succeed in this NHL. just look at guys like gionta and cammalleri.



dont forget parise :D
  • 0
Credit Goes To Nuck94 for the Datsyuk Sig

#102 Karn420

Karn420

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 210 posts
  • Joined: 20-October 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:17 PM

I'm stoked he fell so far and to us.

I like most people wanted a D-Man, but when a talent like this drops so far, you have to snatch him.

Hes only 18, almost 19 i suppose but, I know plenty of guys who have grown 3+ inches from 19-21.
Some people grow late, I'm not promising you all he'll break 6 feet. But its doubtful 5'8" will be his final height.

Wooooooo Shredder!
I'm calling him Shredder and not the Wizard.

Who can we realisticly pickup tommorrow?
Elliot seems unlikely unless our luck Continues.
Tatar probably unrealistic as well?

Any prospect junkies got an idea who we could land 53rd?
  • 0

------------------------------thanks morrison_rocks7, killer sig----------------------------

#103 Champions of Nothing

Champions of Nothing

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,961 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:25 PM

I'm stoked he fell so far and to us.

I like most people wanted a D-Man, but when a talent like this drops so far, you have to snatch him.

Hes only 18, almost 19 i suppose but, I know plenty of guys who have grown 3+ inches from 19-21.
Some people grow late, I'm not promising you all he'll break 6 feet. But its doubtful 5'8" will be his final height.

Wooooooo Shredder!
I'm calling him Shredder and not the Wizard.

Who can we realisticly pickup tommorrow?
Elliot seems unlikely unless our luck Continues.
Tatar probably unrealistic as well?

Any prospect junkies got an idea who we could land 53rd?

I'm Looking at Roussel (unlikely), Brayden McNaab or Tyson Barrie.
  • 0

Posted ImagePosted Image
Sig by Ranyart. FEEL FREE TO USE EITHER!

VOTE FOR EDLER!

And might as well vote for Daniel, Henrik, Kesler, Luongo and..... I guess Aaron Rome?


#104 c00kies

c00kies

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,166 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 07

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:29 PM

I hope he grows to 5'10 at least. 5'8 is just a little too small for my liking. I wanted John Moore because we need D-men, but I'm not going to complain, especially since he was the best available.

Edited by C00KIES, 26 June 2009 - 10:34 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks to Blueberries for the sig :)

#105 c00kies

c00kies

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,166 posts
  • Joined: 06-January 07

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:33 PM

I'm stoked he fell so far and to us.

I like most people wanted a D-Man, but when a talent like this drops so far, you have to snatch him.

Hes only 18, almost 19 i suppose but, I know plenty of guys who have grown 3+ inches from 19-21.
Some people grow late, I'm not promising you all he'll break 6 feet. But its doubtful 5'8" will be his final height.

Wooooooo Shredder!
I'm calling him Shredder and not the Wizard.

Who can we realisticly pickup tommorrow?
Elliot seems unlikely unless our luck Continues.
Tatar probably unrealistic as well?

Any prospect junkies got an idea who we could land 53rd?

I hope we trade up to draft Elliot, I doubt that will happen though. What's Doherty expected to go at, he's huge, 6'8? It would be easier to get him than Elliot so that if we do need to trade up we can do it without it costing us too much.
  • 0
Posted Image
Thanks to Blueberries for the sig :)

#106 Your Mother

Your Mother

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • Joined: 10-January 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:37 PM

mike gillis should move up and draft elliot. perhaps packaging off our 2nd and our 3rd.
  • 0

#107 Champions of Nothing

Champions of Nothing

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,961 posts
  • Joined: 28-August 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:38 PM

I hope we trade up to draft Elliot, I doubt that will happen though. What's Doherty expected to go at, he's huge, 6'8? It would be easier to get him than Elliot so that if we do need to trade up we can do it without it costing us too much.

NO DOHERTY!!!!!!
  • 0

Posted ImagePosted Image
Sig by Ranyart. FEEL FREE TO USE EITHER!

VOTE FOR EDLER!

And might as well vote for Daniel, Henrik, Kesler, Luongo and..... I guess Aaron Rome?


#108 Marian Hossa

Marian Hossa

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 868 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:39 PM

I know it's risky but maybe skip out on D again and go for another forward. We still have a couple anchors in Bieksa and Edler along with the possibility of Sauve being a Top-3 guy and Ellington being a solid 5/6.
  • 0

Credit to ninja321

#109 PlayStation

PlayStation

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,246 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:39 PM

Welcome!
  • 0
Posted Image


"Real Men" :bigblush:

#110 luongo55

luongo55

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,932 posts
  • Joined: 16-December 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:40 PM

Tyson Barrie is a beast.....we should get him tom IMO
  • 0
Credit Goes To Nuck94 for the Datsyuk Sig

#111 Patrick Kane

Patrick Kane

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Assistant to Regional Manager
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,202 posts
  • Joined: 24-October 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 10:44 PM

TONI RAJALA
STEFFAN ELLIOT
THOMAS TATAR
CARL KLINGBERG
RICHARD PANIK
ERIC GELINAS
JEREMY MORIN
ZACH BUDISH
ETHAN WEREK
  • 0


You will be missed.


#112 LickTheEnvelope

LickTheEnvelope

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,577 posts
  • Joined: 29-July 03

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:24 PM

Ok Now In the 2nd Round Draft Tomas Tatar


I like Tatar and also Toni Rajala.

Great pick by Gillis (with a huge amount of luck). Schroeder may be small but he's THICK, and though he may only get to 5'9 he could easily be 190-200 lbs area by the time he cracks the Canucks. He's fast, strong, great skills... a little small but he's dynamic. It really was the obvious pick at 22 with him still on the board.
  • 0
Posted Image
'Here's lookin' at you kid'

#113 The Kassassin Train

The Kassassin Train

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,107 posts
  • Joined: 03-August 05

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:25 PM

mike gillis should move up and draft elliot. perhaps packaging off our 2nd and our 3rd.

We dont have a third (Bernier trade)
  • 0

The key difference is that Sopel can fill in for Seabrook and Campbell just fine. Bieksa, he is garbage so in that sense he is like the worst defenseman in the league.


When Cody (Hodgson) gets older, he might be better than Datsyuk.


Let's not push this guy (Kassian). He's still immature, and if he fails on the 2nd line it's because he isn't ready. Some guys really need years to develop, it's how well and how fast players adapt to the game. In my opinion, I'd rather have Horvat getting 2nd line minutes. He will start off on the 3rd line next season but I see him making the transition, being a great compliment to whoever plays his wings.

At this point, I don't see Kassian fitting in to any role other than a 3rd. If players like Kassian start getting 2nd line minutes then we just stay inconsistent as a team.


The idiocy on CDC....

#114 playboi19

playboi19

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 20,334 posts
  • Joined: 15-August 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:26 PM

The depth down the middle and overall with the forward group is starting to get amazing. Now we just need some defensive depth and we could be heading into Red Wing territory. And this is without free-agent signings for next season.

Center:
H.Sedin
Kesler
Wellwood
Hodgson
Schroeder
White


RW:
Bernier
Burrows
Shirokov
Grabner
Rypien

LW:
D.Sedin
Demitra
Hansen
Raymond
Hordichuk

Edited by youngsundeezy13, 26 June 2009 - 11:29 PM.

  • 0

Subbancopy.jpg


#115 Marian Hossa

Marian Hossa

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 868 posts
  • Joined: 14-June 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:29 PM

We dont have a third (Bernier trade)


We actually had 2 3rds courtesy of the Dan Cloutier trade.

Sad part was we dealt the higher one away.
  • 0

Credit to ninja321

#116 Louis

Louis

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 650 posts
  • Joined: 21-April 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:31 PM

nvm, always thought cammalleri was huge

Edited by Louis, 26 June 2009 - 11:32 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#117 FeStealth

FeStealth

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,386 posts
  • Joined: 10-March 04

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:35 PM

I'm not too worried about him supposedly being shorter than what most fans hoped. There's a difference between someone being 5'8 and being only 170lbs at their prime vs 5'8 and bordering 195-200lbs. Weight is more important than height.

Once he starts putting on the muscle, it just means it'll be hard to check him off the puck.
  • 0
<img src="http://i548.photobuc...kills22_b2.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />
RIP Luc Bourdon
----

Thats the way it is now. IF you're rich you go to the game. If you are middle class you watch in hd, if you are lower class you watch in sd. If you are broke azz you listen to the radio.

Samuelsson to AV: He can go **** himself!


#118 Gnickers87

Gnickers87

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,441 posts
  • Joined: 27-January 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 11:46 PM

I'm not too worried about him supposedly being shorter than what most fans hoped. There's a difference between someone being 5'8 and being only 170lbs at their prime vs 5'8 and bordering 195-200lbs. Weight is more important than height.

Once he starts putting on the muscle, it just means it'll be hard to check him off the puck.


exactly, he is 5'8 178lbs, that's pretty muscular.

Look at Parise, he's 5'11 and no bigger then 180 - 185lbs, his size isn't holding him back.
  • 0
Posted Image

#119 awalk

awalk

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,070 posts
  • Joined: 08-January 06

Posted 27 June 2009 - 12:07 AM

I know it's risky but maybe skip out on D again and go for another forward. We still have a couple anchors in Bieksa and Edler along with the possibility of Sauve being a Top-3 guy and Ellington being a solid 5/6.



BPA
  • 0

#120 TRIPP3D

TRIPP3D

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,377 posts
  • Joined: 01-April 08

Posted 27 June 2009 - 12:13 AM

Posted Image Posted Image

LOLOLOLOLOL
  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.