Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: Jordan Schroeder Talk - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (24 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Jordan Schroeder Talk I'm excited!

#21 User is offline   Hodgson59 Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,531
  • Joined: 10-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:47 PM

He will be great. But he's just 5'8
PM FOR SIGS!!!!!

Hodgson59
PM FOR SIGS!!!
0

#22 User is offline   Rey Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:47 PM

View PostDave354, on Jun 26 2009, 07:45 PM, said:

Does this mean that next year the Canucks prospects will centre the top two lines of the gophers? I can't remember if Schroeder played centre on the top line last year.


Schroeder did play on the top line and top pp units. The problem is, Ryan Stoa will be tough to replace and Schroeder may struggle just a bit without a big forward with skill such as Stoa.

Thanks, RK.17 for the Sig!

QUOTE
"He's a very strong two-way player and can really dominate along the wall with the puck -- very strong kid. Give him three years at Minnesota and I think you'll find yourselves very happy with this pick";Link
0

#23 User is offline   MattDuchene9 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 804
  • Joined: 13-January 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:47 PM

LOL NICE GILLIS! TWO YEARS IN A ROW!
MG!! PLAY GRABNER AND HANSEN FOR NEXT SEASON!
GOOD LUCK NASLUND IN NEW YORK!
SEDINS PWN !

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=GE0vVA3uXAg[/b]
0

#24 User is offline   MattDuchene9 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 804
  • Joined: 13-January 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:48 PM

Why does my posts keep getting reposted!??!
MG!! PLAY GRABNER AND HANSEN FOR NEXT SEASON!
GOOD LUCK NASLUND IN NEW YORK!
SEDINS PWN !

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=GE0vVA3uXAg[/b]
0

#25 User is offline   WillMit Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,266
  • Joined: 14-December 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:48 PM

View PostMattDuchene9, on Jun 26 2009, 07:38 PM, said:

LOL NICE GILLIS! TWO YEARS IN A ROW!



Whoops a crack in the floor!

There's goes Schroeder.


And some people were bitching about the prospect of drafting a little "runt" like Ellis...... this guy is 2 inches shorter!


Anyways, I'm not that upset really, I hope he puts on a few inches, but overall a pretty good pick. Again, one of the smartest players in the draft.

Schroeder------------------------------Hodgson------------------------------Shirokov
0

#26 User is offline   capt. kirk mclean Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 35
  • Joined: 30-October 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:49 PM

a young Wellwood, or a younger kane(chi)
0

#27 User is offline   jovi Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 06-August 08

Post icon  Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:49 PM

View PostComfortably_Numb, on Jun 26 2009, 07:43 PM, said:

Are you serious?

Add 4 inches to the kid and he is a guaranteed top 5 pick, and height isn't really a problem nowadays.



Yes i am serious.. I do see your point schroeder is a steel at 22nd overall. However, another small center? You do see where i'm coming from with this right?


0

#28 User is offline   Sanford Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,649
  • Joined: 23-December 07

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:50 PM

Isin't he in the same team with pat white?
0

#29 User is offline   g_bassi13 Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,033
  • Joined: 11-December 06

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:51 PM

View PostCanauhks, on Jun 26 2009, 06:39 PM, said:

Pat Kane 2.0

I just know it :D

It's great that he fell to us at 22nd... But that's seriously pushing it.
Posted Image
Hola, me llamo Inspector Carlton Lassiter. Me gusta queso.
0

#30 User is offline   Hodgson59 Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,531
  • Joined: 10-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:51 PM

The next Steve Yzerman, eh?
PM FOR SIGS!!!!!

Hodgson59
PM FOR SIGS!!!
0

#31 User is offline   CanucksPwn Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 16
  • Joined: 22-June 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:51 PM

View Postedgalor, on Jun 26 2009, 07:32 PM, said:

Jordan Schroeder.... didnt really think we can land this guy in the 22nd pick, but I won't complain much.

so let's talk about him~ what kind of a player is he? Since this guy is a projected 14th-17th pick in most of the mock drafts, I didn't really check this guy out. It seems like alot of people is pretty happy about him since most of the reports stat he's a very talented player. Very good speed, very strong shot, a great playmaker who can make his teamates around him better, it's just too good to think we can land him in the 22nd pick.

But that being said, it seems one of the biggest draw back on Jordan Schroeder is his small size (173 cm) and I am not sure how this will effect his career in the NHL in the future.

Would be nice to see what you guys think of him. :D



oh so what your saying is datsyuk and st. louis suck just cause they are small
0

#32 User is offline   canucks9314 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 618
  • Joined: 28-December 07

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:52 PM

I'm Siked

Thanks to Daniel_Sedin for the Sig...
0

#33 User is offline   edgalor Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Joined: 17-May 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:52 PM

so where will Schroeder end up into next year? Stay in NCAA? Would be nice to see him in the training camp, but I doubt he will play for the canucks next year due to his size :C
QUOTE (Glory Days @ Jul 21 2009, 09:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
AT 3-5 Million a season Luongo is a good goalie, anything more is robbery.

Who would you rather have for the money Malkin, Ovechkin, Crosby or Luongo? Choice is simple I am not picking the guy with the over inflated pads.





QUOTE (Pinhead @ Jun 20 2009, 02:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
p.s. 

And unless LUongo wins an award and or makes the conference finals, he was no better than Cloutier. 

in fact, Cloutier went farther in the playoffs with the canucks than Luongo has.
0

#34 User is offline   sirensong87 Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 210
  • Joined: 13-December 08

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:52 PM

View PostRey, on Jun 26 2009, 07:47 PM, said:

Schroeder did play on the top line and top pp units. The problem is, Ryan Stoa will be tough to replace and Schroeder may struggle just a bit without a big forward with skill such as Stoa.


Stoa is a center as well, did they actually play together other than the PP?

His season last year is VERY impressive, looks like a steal at this point. If Pat Kane can be as successfull as he is at his size in the western conference Schroeder should be fine, hes thicker and stronger. Another good pick by Gillis.
0

#35 User is offline   Rey Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:53 PM

View PostSanford, on Jun 26 2009, 07:50 PM, said:

Isin't he in the same team with pat white?


Yeah. Same team. You'd figure this might give a extra confidence boost to both players.

Thanks, RK.17 for the Sig!

QUOTE
"He's a very strong two-way player and can really dominate along the wall with the puck -- very strong kid. Give him three years at Minnesota and I think you'll find yourselves very happy with this pick";Link
0

#36 User is offline   BionicBunny Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,234
  • Joined: 07-April 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:53 PM

When will he make it to the NHL? 2-4 years?
Hello.
0

#37 User is offline   Nemesis13 Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,254
  • Joined: 02-February 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:53 PM

Do not give this guy the expectations of being the next Yzerman etc..

I think he will be good, but Gillis will let him develop and bring him up when he is ready.
Posted Image
Credit to Canuckman3 for the sick sig!
Posted Image
Click Logo to see my Ultimate Sim League Game Roster
0

#38 User is offline   Rey Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:54 PM

View Postedgalor, on Jun 26 2009, 07:52 PM, said:

so where will Schroeder end up into next year? Stay in NCAA? Would be nice to see him in the training camp, but I doubt he will play for the canucks next year due to his size :C


He should spend at least another year in the NCAA. With Stoa gone. Schroeder will be to "go to" guy with the Gophers. Plus, he'll go back to World JR USA. Lots of experience can be gained.

Thanks, RK.17 for the Sig!

QUOTE
"He's a very strong two-way player and can really dominate along the wall with the puck -- very strong kid. Give him three years at Minnesota and I think you'll find yourselves very happy with this pick";Link
0

#39 User is offline   Rey Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,905
  • Joined: 07-March 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:55 PM

View Postsirensong87, on Jun 26 2009, 07:52 PM, said:

Stoa is a center as well, did they actually play together other than the PP?

His season last year is VERY impressive, looks like a steal at this point. If Pat Kane can be as successfull as he is at his size in the western conference Schroeder should be fine, hes thicker and stronger. Another good pick by Gillis.



Schroeder can play on the wing.

Thanks, RK.17 for the Sig!

QUOTE
"He's a very strong two-way player and can really dominate along the wall with the puck -- very strong kid. Give him three years at Minnesota and I think you'll find yourselves very happy with this pick";Link
0

#40 User is offline   edgalor Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,008
  • Joined: 17-May 09

Posted 26 June 2009 - 07:56 PM

View PostCanucksPwn, on Jun 26 2009, 07:51 PM, said:

oh so what your saying is datsyuk and st. louis suck just cause they are small


suck? no

but it is a reasonable concern :D I am very exciting about acquiring him, but rationally you just can't overlook his lack of size since this is probably his only drawback from being a complete package~

as for your examples, St. Louis is 175 cm who took him until his late 20s to have a break out year. and Schroeder is 2 cm shorter than him.

Datsyuk is 180 cm......
QUOTE (Glory Days @ Jul 21 2009, 09:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
AT 3-5 Million a season Luongo is a good goalie, anything more is robbery.

Who would you rather have for the money Malkin, Ovechkin, Crosby or Luongo? Choice is simple I am not picking the guy with the over inflated pads.





QUOTE (Pinhead @ Jun 20 2009, 02:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
p.s. 

And unless LUongo wins an award and or makes the conference finals, he was no better than Cloutier. 

in fact, Cloutier went farther in the playoffs with the canucks than Luongo has.
0

  • (24 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.