Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: [Rumour] Canucks were interested in Gaborik - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

[Rumour] Canucks were interested in Gaborik

#1 User is offline   Meaner Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Prospect
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 261
  • Joined: 18-June 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:31 PM

http://communities.c...h-nyr-deal.aspx
0

#2 User is offline   Chow-Time! Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,872
  • Joined: 11-July 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:31 PM

[Rumour] Canucks are interested at getting better
Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   Isac Rukebov Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 938
  • Joined: 23-April 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:32 PM

Every team was interested in Gabs. He picked New York. 'Nuff said.

The Seattle Totems, part of Seattle's hockey history.
http://bp1.blogger.c...temsjerseys.jpg
0

#4 User is offline   Dorkey Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 26-April 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:32 PM

View PostChow-Time!, on Jul 2 2009, 01:31 PM, said:

[Rumour] Canucks are interested at getting better


Doesn't seem that way right now ;)

Hopefully MG has something up his sleeve.

This post has been edited by Dorkey: 02 July 2009 - 01:33 PM


0

#5 User is offline   scottrockztheworld Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,048
  • Joined: 25-April 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:32 PM

too injury prone.

Salo is that guy for us.

rk17
0

#6 User is offline   Happy Gilmore Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,067
  • Joined: 26-June 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:33 PM

I'm glad we didn't give him 7.5 per. Obviously we wouldn't have been able to afford it anyway.
0

#7 User is offline   diesel_3 Icon


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,929
  • Joined: 13-April 03

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:33 PM

NO WAY!

Thanks to Daniel_Sedin for the sig!

Thanks to S.Bernier, Support our Troops
0

#8 User is offline   nlife Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,238
  • Joined: 08-September 06

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:33 PM

View PostChow-Time!, on Jul 2 2009, 01:31 PM, said:

[Rumour] Canucks are interested at getting better



SOURCE :lol:
Posted Image

Wii-wood

-------
Raj: The only thing I've learned in the last two hours is that American men love drinking beer, pee too often, and have trouble getting erections.

Leonard: Focus on the game, not the commercials, Raj.

Raj: I'm just saying, maybe if you people cut back on the beer, you could get out of the bathroom and satisfy your women without pharmaceutical help.
0

#9 User is offline   Al▪ Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,626
  • Joined: 24-October 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:33 PM

Who isn't interested?
Posted Image
Sig by me, Ehrhoff Point Counter - 5g, 10a, 15pts in 22gp

0

#10 User is offline   TheKottonmouthed Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,522
  • Joined: 21-March 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:34 PM

yea Gillis was like Gabby wnat to come to Vancouver for a 5m Cap hit.

Gabby said HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA........



Gillis went are you still there and Gabby said nothing becuase he had hung up.
0

#11 User is offline   jshazz Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 340
  • Joined: 27-February 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:34 PM

is that the writer who guaranteed gaborik signing here?

looks like a cya article
0

#12 User is offline   MickeyBlueEyes Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 306
  • Joined: 20-February 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:34 PM

Ahhh yes, the rangers, where players go to retire....lindros (yeah he went to toronto for a few games, but come on, that doesn't count right haha), bure, naslund...gaborik is gonna blow his groin and then need a hip replacement a year into his deal and he'll retire...

This post has been edited by MickeyBlueEyes: 02 July 2009 - 01:35 PM

0

#13 User is offline   Renelsisc Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 910
  • Joined: 01-March 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:34 PM

yeah, canucks interested in gaborik was pretty much a given.....what probably happened was that we offered Gaborik a 4 year 6 contract or something like that...and just before he signed it NYR came and screwed everything up by offering a 5 year 7.5mil....So i mean, the extra 10+ mil for Gaborik is a lot of money, and anyone rejecting that offer would REALLY REALLY have to like Vancouver ALOT. So I can't blame Gabby for going to NY
0

#14 User is offline   Special Ed Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,233
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:35 PM

DUH?

Stop making posts like this dummies.
Oversized signature (max 400x200 please)
0

#15 User is offline   Attica Icon


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,396
  • Joined: 22-December 03

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:35 PM

I don't think Gillis could justify that deal, 7.5 million for 17 games?

I would have been a fan of a deal that brought him here, but not for more than the Sedin's got.
0

#16 User is offline   AmazingNuck Icon


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10,991
  • Joined: 27-December 06

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:35 PM

7.5 is way too much, because there's a good chance he'll miss atleast one of those years. Maybe 7.5 for one year, but damn.
Henrik, without Daniel, stat track: 9gp 3g 7a 1 6PIM
0

#17 User is offline   BluXington Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,811
  • Joined: 03-April 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:39 PM

No Sheet Sherlock.

This post has been edited by BluXington: 02 July 2009 - 01:45 PM





0

#18 User is offline   Lupinski Icon


  • Salmon Kings Star
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 63
  • Joined: 02-May 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:39 PM

With Gillis complaining about the 'crazy' contracts being offered out there, no doubt we were outbid.

What I'd like to know is if these GM's are offering outrageous dollars while gambling that the cap will be going up after 2011 or 2012, or whether they think the league will come to the rescue with changes to the cap rules if enough teams are in dire situations after these kinds of payouts?

There must be some rationale for these contracts. These guys are not dumb.
0

#19 User is offline   Raoul Duke Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7,220
  • Joined: 11-April 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:45 PM

[Rumour] My nuts itch.

No wait, that's official.
0

#20 User is offline   eh Blondie Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 340
  • Joined: 10-April 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 01:56 PM

Haha, there's a war brewing between the writers for the Sun and those of the Province. The Sun totally called Botch out earlier this week, and I guess this is his response.

0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.