[rovers till i die]

Everyone wants to trade him. but do you relise with him gone our goelie of the feature is Lukas Monseter! what if Luongo gets hurt! What if we have a situation like last year where both goelies get hurt! call up schnider to be luongos backup BUT DO NOT TRADE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[luongo55]

we want to trade him because we can't spell his name

[Rypien37]

Because re-signing Luongo would guarantee he would only get back up minutes for years to come (10 games a year, if that), which would destroy his development.

[canuck2xtreme]

350Z, on Jul 2 2009, 02:46 PM, said:

Because re-signing Luongo would guarantee he would only get back up minutes for years to come (10 games a year, if that), which would destroy his development.

This. Also, I'm not sure why you want to keep him so much, since you can't even spell his name. It's Cory Schneider, just so you know.

And finally, if we bring him up to play as Luongo's backup, he counts as $1,084,200 against the cap. That's a bit high for a guy that will get 10-12 games. Besides, if we do get Luongo to sign an extension, Schneider is very good, and would be expendable, therefore, we'd have a pretty good trade asset.

[rovers till i die]

canuck2xtreme, on Jul 3 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

This. Also, I'm not sure why you want to keep him so much, since you can't even spell his name. It's Cory Schneider, just so you know.

And finally, if we bring him up to play as Luongo's backup, he counts as $1,084,200 against the cap. That's a bit high for a guy that will get 10-12 games. Besides, if we do get Luongo to sign an extension, Schneider is very good, and would be expendable, therefore, we'd have a pretty good trade asset.

thanks for the spelling. but still Lukas Monseter!

[canuck2xtreme]

rovers till i die, on Jul 2 2009, 03:04 PM, said:

thanks for the spelling. but still Lukas Monseter!

Draft? Trade? UFA? European signings? College players?

We can address that need. If Luongo re-signs, we don't need a potential number one guy for a while. The assets that Schneider could bring us help address more pressing needs to our team now and don't cripple us for the future.

I'm all for keeping Schneider, I think he'll be a solid NHL goaltender. But the minute Luongo signs an extension, Cory becomes expendable. I like the guy, but that's just the way it is.

[Nuckz4life]

luongo55, on Jul 2 2009, 02:44 PM, said:

we want to trade him because we can't spell his name

+1

[AmazingNuck]

Because he will eventually become impatient with our program (ie. not playing at all) and won't re-sign with us, opting to look for a contract elsewhere or request to be traded.

[rovers till i die]

350Z, on Jul 3 2009, 09:16 AM, said:

Because re-signing Luongo would guarantee he would only get back up minutes for years to come (10 games a year, if that), which would destroy his development.

he is way better than that. Maybe 20. after all he is AHL goelie of the year.

[rovers till i die]

canuck2xtreme, on Jul 3 2009, 09:39 AM, said:

Draft? Trade? UFA? European signings? College players?

We can address that need. If Luongo re-signs, we don't need a potential number one guy for a while. The assets that Schneider could bring us help address more pressing needs to our team now and don't cripple us for the future.

I'm all for keeping Schneider, I think he'll be a solid NHL goaltender. But the minute Luongo signs an extension, Cory becomes expendable. I like the guy, but that's just the way it is.

draft. Check the in the system page.

[rovers till i die]

350Z, on Jul 3 2009, 09:16 AM, said:

Because re-signing Luongo would guarantee he would only get back up minutes for years to come (10 games a year, if that), which would destroy his development.

what happens if we dont resign Luongo?

[Jkhol]

rovers till i die, on Jul 2 2009, 02:53 PM, said:

what happens if we dont resign Luongo?

Then Schneider isn't traded, simple really. If Luongo re-signs, Schneider is most likely gone by trade deadline.

[PlayStation]

shnider I said it outl oud how you spelt it and I laughed out loud

[StrongSide]

rovers till i die, on Jul 2 2009, 02:43 PM, said:

Everyone wants to trade him[,] but do you relise with him gone our goelie of the feature is Lukas Monseter! what if Luongo gets hurt! What if we have a situation like last year where both goelies get hurt! call up schnider to be luongo[']s backup BUT DO NOT TRADE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2nd grade?
Did you really want to ask us why moving Schneider might be beneficial, or were you just trying to gain attention?

This post has been edited by Neighbour: 02 July 2009 - 05:55 PM

[canuck2xtreme]

rovers till i die, on Jul 2 2009, 03:51 PM, said:

draft. Check the in the system page.

uhh.. Okay I'm not sure what you were getting at with this post. My point was there are several ways to fill the void left if Schneider is moved, since the OP was worried about our depth in goal.

[Hallzy]

rovers till i die, on Jul 2 2009, 05:43 PM, said:

Everyone wants to trade him. but do you relise with him gone our goelie of the feature is Lukas Monseter! what if Luongo gets hurt! What if we have a situation like last year where both goelies get hurt! call up schnider to be luongos backup BUT DO NOT TRADE HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Because we're tired of people mis-spelling his name.

[shimy1]

because we wont need a prospect of his talent level at that position, when we have clear deficiencies at other positions.

[Venom52]

GUYS!!! DON'T TRADE SHNIDER!!11!!!1!!ONE! HE IS TOO GOOD

We can trade Schnieder though

[rovers till i die]

PlayStation, on Jul 3 2009, 11:30 AM, said:

shnider I said it outl oud how you spelt it and I laughed out loud

oud you do. I dont see much better in your spelling

[rovers till i die]

luongo55, on Jul 3 2009, 09:14 AM, said:

we want to trade him because we can't spell his name

hey im just a kid!