Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: [Report] Jannik Hansen on the trade block - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

[Report] Jannik Hansen on the trade block

#121 User is offline   absent Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 19-October 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 08:06 PM

I would've liked to see him around with the Canucks next year for cheap. He's a versatile guy who can be plugged in on literally ANY of the 4 lines. Not an exceptional superstar, but as an injury replacement type depth guy, he's about the best you could ask for i think.
0

#122 User is offline   Citizen Erased Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 22,130
  • Joined: 14-August 04

Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:10 PM

View PostNeo-Nietzchean-Canuck, on Jul 3 2009, 10:19 AM, said:

Gillis clearly chose Rypien over Hansen when he resigned him.

And what happens after Rypien gets hurt 5 games into the season?
QUOTE (Vlad the Impaler @ Oct 29 2009, 11:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
/peanut butter
//testicles
///dog
/guilty pleasure only if someone sees

0

#123 User is offline   Schroeder Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,142
  • Joined: 20-January 08

Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:15 PM

View PostNeo-Nietzchean-Canuck, on Jul 2 2009, 06:19 PM, said:

Gillis clearly chose Rypien over Hansen when he resigned him.


There may be a number of reasons that Rypien was chosen offer Hansen.

1. Gillis wants toughness on this team, especially on the fourth line
2. Hansen has more trade value
3. We already have Raymond

Even though Hansen has a lot more offensive potential, the team would not be physical enough without the fighters.
Posted Image

<!--coloro:#FFFFFF--><span style="color:#FFFFFF"><!--/coloro-->o<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><img src="http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/9716/canuckshavebadfengshuic.png" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" />

<!--quoteo(post=7743032:date=Sep 5 2009, 11:36 AM:name=*J.hAnSeN FAN!@!*)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (*J.hAnSeN FAN!@!* @ Sep 5 2009, 11:36 AM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=7743032"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->If the Devils don't make the playoffs this year i will become a leafs fan. Quote me on it!<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--quoteo(post=7778434:date=Sep 13 2009, 08:34 PM:name=ephneh)--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ephneh @ Sep 13 2009, 08:34 PM) <a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=7778434"><{POST_SNAPBACK}></a></div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I also think screwing Burke is fun...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--coloro:#4B0082--><span style="color:#4B0082"><!--/coloro--><!--fonto:Franklin Gothic Medium--><span style="font-family:Franklin Gothic Medium"><!--/fonto-->Never Smudge with maximum brush size... <!--fontc--></span><!--/fontc--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
0

#124 User is offline   canucklehead44 Icon


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,990
  • Joined: 24-May 03

Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:17 PM

I don't think he is on the trade block. He had a decent rookie season. Showed he can stand up for his teammates, played well defensively, was tenacious at times. 21 points in 55 isn't all that shabby for a bottom 6 rookie either. I have a feeling Demitra might be though.

This post has been edited by canucklehead44: 05 July 2009 - 02:17 PM

Double the trouble.
0

#125 User is offline   timw33 Icon


  • Canucks Hall-of-Famer
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Community Moderator
  • Posts: 26,710
  • Joined: 24-August 06

Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:20 PM

I would be very sad to see Hansen go, I've been keeping close track of him as he develops, but if it brings in a quality defenseman...have to build the best team we can.
Posted Image
0

#126 User is offline   Mike27 Icon


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,254
  • Joined: 05-August 05

Posted 05 July 2009 - 02:49 PM

View Posttimw33, on Jul 5 2009, 04:20 PM, said:

I would be very sad to see Hansen go, I've been keeping close track of him as he develops, but if it brings in a quality defenseman...have to build the best team we can.



Exactly right. As prospects turn into players, they have to keep moving up the depth chart or they will be overtaken by newer prospects. Hansen has been developed into a serviceable NHL winger, but his prospects with the Canucks look to have stalled.

That doesn't mean he won't continue to improve in another organization though.

Another similar story from the 90's was a defenceman turned winger named Scott Walker...........and he ended up with a nice career in the NHL.
Trade Bieksa? Not even if it was a one for one deal for a guy like Ovechkin. And I am being serious. Linden53
0

#127 User is offline   Boudrias Icon


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,866
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 06 July 2009 - 06:48 AM

View Postcanucklehead44, on Jul 5 2009, 03:17 PM, said:

I don't think he is on the trade block. He had a decent rookie season. Showed he can stand up for his teammates, played well defensively, was tenacious at times. 21 points in 55 isn't all that shabby for a bottom 6 rookie either. I have a feeling Demitra might be though.

Your right. When you look at the forwards I suspect that Demo is more of a writeoff than most, particularly if Raymond comes back in the fall with 10 pounds more. The fact that fans write off Hanson after his rookie season is laughable. He can be sereviceable on eith the 3rd or 4th line. The same way that Raymond, Bernier and Wellwood can be spotted up onto the top 2 lines when required.
0

#128 User is offline   bustaruckus Icon


  • Salmon Kings Regular
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 30-June 08

Posted 06 July 2009 - 08:51 AM

View PostGoalline, on Jul 2 2009, 10:39 PM, said:

Gillis is a plug. I cant believe this newb.

Almost screws up the first signing he makes that would cripple the team.

Imagine Sundin for 10 million this year.


Sign Sedins to a cap hit that cripples us to make any moves this year.

12 year 55 million they would have signed right away.

8,8,8,8,5,5,4,4,2,( They retire this year)1,1,1,

4.5833 cap hit.


leaves us 14 million to work with to really fix our need for a puck moving defenseman plus a top 6 winger.


He chooses Rypien over Hansen. this guy is brutal!



As far as the contract Gillis signed the twins to... He was handcuffed by the owners, as the Aquillini's do not like the long term deals(I think they see big numbers and get scared).
0

#129 User is offline   Des!Munda DrippinLik3Fanta Icon


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 24-August 07

Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:29 AM

It's Jannik 'fudgin' Hansen. No big deal.



••.•΄―`•.••Thanx Pfizer 4 the Sig & the Avatar••.•΄―`•.••
QUOTE (Paranoia @ Aug 27 2009, 05:54 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, will Asian people still be bad drivers?

0

#130 User is offline   Nuckle_Up Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 571
  • Joined: 14-September 06

Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:36 AM

Why is it that Canuck's fans put the most average players up on the pedestal? Is it just because of the coverage, the exposure? You all realize that there are 30 teams in the league with 23 man rosters each that's a total of 690 players plus prospects, minor leaguers, etc...

Out of the 1,000 potential and active NHLers Hansen is average. Plain and simple.

The truth will set you free. Now stop being such homers... seriously people crying in their beers over Jason Jaffray??!! Now this... you guys are embarassing!
0

#131 User is offline   TheKottonmouthed Icon


  • Canucks First-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,522
  • Joined: 21-March 07

Posted 06 July 2009 - 10:41 AM

View PostBenfica_pride, on Jul 6 2009, 10:36 AM, said:

Why is it that Canuck's fans put the most average players up on the pedestal? Is it just because of the coverage, the exposure? You all realize that there are 30 teams in the league with 23 man rosters each that's a total of 690 players plus prospects, minor leaguers, etc...

Out of the 1,000 potential and active NHLers Hansen is average. Plain and simple.

The truth will set you free. Now stop being such homers... seriously people crying in their beers over Jason Jaffray??!! Now this... you guys are embarassing!


nobody is crying or is desperate to hold on to either Jaffray or Hansen.

However Canucks fans are smart enough to relize when a servicable and cheap players are about to be lost or are lost.
0

#132 User is offline   Nuckle_Up Icon


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 571
  • Joined: 14-September 06

Posted 06 July 2009 - 11:28 AM

View PostTheKottonmouthed, on Jul 6 2009, 10:41 AM, said:

nobody is crying or is desperate to hold on to either Jaffray or Hansen.

However Canucks fans are smart enough to relize when a servicable and cheap players are about to be lost or are lost.


Servicable and cheap players are lost and subsequently replaced all the time. Not worth the energy people expend discussing them.

Bottom line is stop worrying about the 3rd and 4th liners, they're easily replaced. It's your top 6 that logs the icetime and is relied upon. There is nothing top 6 about Hansen, and I mean that with all due respect. The guy is a canuck so I'm behind him, but put him on a pedestal? I will not.
0

  • (7 Pages)
  • +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.