Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Canucks Community: DOWN WITH EKLUND - Canucks Community

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

DOWN WITH EKLUND Can we PLEASE clean this section up from this joke?

#1 User is offline   Special Ed 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,226
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:03 PM

Would be alot beter to read more reliable sources.

How hard would it be to have Eklund posts removed from this section as it seems I'm not the only one who dislikes them.

Sign up here:
Oversized signature (max 400x200 please)
0

#2 User is offline   Kesler4Captain 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,222
  • Joined: 17-November 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:03 PM

I'm in


THE CORE
GO CANUCKS GO




0

#3 User is offline   M.Gaborik10 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,300
  • Joined: 20-March 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:04 PM

then u shouldnt read it

eklunds been right so far
Parise SNP 86-Dumont PLY 83- Carter SNP 86
Lupul SNP 83 -Zajac PLY 82 - Rolston SNP 82
Shanahan PWF 82 -Langenbrunner PWF 84 - Kulemine SNP 79
Pandalfo GRN 77 - Vrana PLY 74 - Clarkson TGH 77

Oduya DFD 80 - Doughty OFD 83
Johnson OFD 83- Vlasic DFD 83

Salvador DFD 78 - Greene DFD 77

Brodeur HYB 91
Danis HYB 75

Extras: Davison DFD 75, Leach DFD 72, Murphy OFD 75,Mottau DFD 76 Walter PLY 74
Ledlond TGH 71
0

#4 User is offline   bieksa3- 


  • Canucks Franchise Player
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11,150
  • Joined: 04-March 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:05 PM

A thread like this got locked yesterday.
Posted Image
kaptainkesler
0

#5 User is offline   Special Ed 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,226
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:08 PM

View PostM.Gaborik10, on Jul 2 2009, 09:04 PM, said:

then u shouldnt read it

eklunds been right so far


Ya well sometimes the threads are not clearly marked as being Eklund.

Just think if enough ppl don't like using him as a source on this forum he should be gone.

How about we see how many ppl don't want him here?
Oversized signature (max 400x200 please)
0

#6 User is offline   AriGold 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,098
  • Joined: 29-May 08

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:09 PM

View PostM.Gaborik10, on Jul 2 2009, 09:04 PM, said:

then u shouldnt read it

eklunds been right so far

:blink: :blink: :blink:
Heatley to edmonton is a done deal E5
Gaborik has signed with vancouver E5
Sedins to toronto E4
Havlet resigns with Chicago E5
Kovalex resigns with Montreal E5

Yeah man your right.. hes always right..

DONT RETIRE NUMBER 19
0

#7 User is offline   【Canuckslicious】 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,751
  • Joined: 09-December 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:12 PM

I think the problem is everything that Eklund says gets a thread. I think E4s and E5s are allowed to have a thread, anything else should go into one mega Eklund thread.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Inspired by kanucks25
0

#8 User is online   Apples 


  • Canucks Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,589
  • Joined: 21-May 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:13 PM

This thread will get locked too. It is not a Trades, Rumours, Signings.

This post has been edited by Apples: 02 July 2009 - 09:13 PM

My 2009/2010 Vancouver Canucks

Sedin- Sedin - Burrows
Demitra - Kesler - Samuelsson
Bernier - Wellwood - Raymond
Rypien - Johnson - Hordichuk

Mitchell - Bieksa
Elder - Ehrhoff
Salo - Schnieder

Luongo
Raycroft
0

#9 User is offline   Special Ed 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,226
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:15 PM

View PostApples, on Jul 2 2009, 09:13 PM, said:

This thread will get locked too. It is not a Trades, Rumours, Signings.


Good point, sorry mods just frustrated with all the eklund stuff.

Could move this to the right section or lock.

Otherwise people unhappy with eklund let us know!
Oversized signature (max 400x200 please)
0

#10 User is offline   Hockeyfans101 


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,004
  • Joined: 16-July 04

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:26 PM

It adds something to talk about. Without him, this forum is dead.
Oversized signature (please reduce the number of quotes)
0

#11 User is offline   Sushi 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,288
  • Joined: 27-September 03

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:27 PM

View PostNucksFan79, on Jul 2 2009, 09:03 PM, said:

Would be alot beter to read more reliable sources.

How hard would it be to have Eklund posts removed from this section as it seems I'm not the only one who dislikes them.

Sign up here:


posts like this are exactly why people visit his site, you're not helping
Colorado Avalance

Milan Lucic - Ryan Getzlaf - Shane Doan
Jason Williams - Forward - Forward
Cam Barker - Michal Rozsival
Mathieu Schneider - Adrian Aucoin
Carey Price
Vesa Toskala
0

#12 User is offline   nlife 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,233
  • Joined: 08-September 06

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:27 PM

WHY DO EKLUND HATERS CONTINUE TO POST THIS CRAP! COULDN'T IT HAVE BEEN PLACED IN ANY ONE OF THE 8 MILLION OTHER THREADS ABOUT "HOW EKLUND SUCKS! AND I HAVE A NEW AND ORIGINAL SPIN ON IT!"? Oh wait, you can't because those threads GET LOCKED for a reason. QUIT posting about how you hate Eklund you whiny, four legged little pooch!
Posted Image

Wii-wood

-------
Raj: The only thing I've learned in the last two hours is that American men love drinking beer, pee too often, and have trouble getting erections.

Leonard: Focus on the game, not the commercials, Raj.

Raj: I'm just saying, maybe if you people cut back on the beer, you could get out of the bathroom and satisfy your women without pharmaceutical help.
0

#13 User is offline   gobiasindustries 


  • Manitoba Moose Regular
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 340
  • Joined: 13-July 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:39 PM

Im getting sick of eklund threads.

HE IS NEVER RIGHT. STOP POSTING HIS CRAPPY RUMORS


Clint Eastwood is the last true badass.

He's the last living legend. He's even kickass as a 78 year old.

All hail Clint eastwood. John wayne fans can only dream.


RIP Luc Bourdon. God bless the bourdon family
0

#14 User is offline   Chow-Time! 


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,831
  • Joined: 11-July 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:39 PM

Without Eklund this section of the forum would be dead, stop and think about that for awhile.
0

#15 User is offline   ! 


  • Canucks Third-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,821
  • Joined: 18-November 06

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:42 PM

View PostChow-Time!, on Jul 2 2009, 09:39 PM, said:

Without Eklund this section of the forum would be dead, stop and think about that for awhile.


then so be it

imo all eklund crap should be posted in a single thread where all the gullible and brainless kids can talk about crap spewed by eklund's butthole all they want
QUOTE (canuckster19 @ May 20 2009, 02:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Stop talking about board rules!

QUOTE (RIP_Luc @ Jun 19 2009, 10:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
nice grammer.

QUOTE ({LLC}LT.Reaper @ Jun 25 2009, 04:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
no way that mean hordichuk would get 10 million per season. im srry but that isn't happening maybe 10 million over 10 years but he is not good enough for 10 million per season


0

#16 User is offline   Special Ed 


  • Canucks Prospect
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,226
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:46 PM

View PostChow-Time!, on Jul 2 2009, 09:39 PM, said:

Without Eklund this section of the forum would be dead, stop and think about that for awhile.


Your arguement fails.

Eklund rumours are so pathetic they are the equivalent to SPAM.

I would rather this section lose some of it's "action" if it means more reliable and not so stupid sources.

Eklund is a huge joke, thats why you will always have people making threads such as this.
Oversized signature (max 400x200 please)
0

#17 User is offline   Chow-Time! 


  • Canucks Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 8,831
  • Joined: 11-July 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 09:51 PM

View Post!, on Jul 2 2009, 09:42 PM, said:

then so be it

imo all eklund crap should be posted in a single thread where all the gullible and brainless kids can talk about crap spewed by eklund's butthole all they want



View PostNucksFan79, on Jul 2 2009, 09:46 PM, said:

Your arguement fails.

Eklund rumours are so pathetic they are the equivalent to SPAM.

I would rather this section lose some of it's "action" if it means more reliable and not so stupid sources.

Eklund is a huge joke, thats why you will always have people making threads such as this.


Well, then you guys make it happen and get Eklund banned. Then all this section would be is just [SIGNINGS], nothing else for fans to gossip or debate about. This is a forum, Eklund is perfectly fine for a place like this. It's not his fault some of the dumbsh*ts actually think that what he says is going to happen 100%.

Oh and your statement of "Your argument fails", way to try to make yourself sound smart. You failed
0

#18 User is offline   SammyG 


  • Canucks Rookie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,939
  • Joined: 13-February 06

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:18 PM

View PostChow-Time!, on Jul 2 2009, 09:51 PM, said:

Well, then you guys make it happen and get Eklund banned. Then all this section would be is just [SIGNINGS], nothing else for fans to gossip or debate about. This is a forum, Eklund is perfectly fine for a place like this. It's not his fault some of the dumbsh*ts actually think that what he says is going to happen 100%.

Oh and your statement of "Your argument fails", way to try to make yourself sound smart. You failed


Then how is it sites like hockeybums and others get banned when they post "rumours" as well?? In my opinion there have been much more accurate sites that got banned over eklund. It's just ridiculous to set restrictions for some websites yet allow a source that is not even a source...HE'S NEVER RIGHT!!

This post has been edited by SammyG: 02 July 2009 - 11:19 PM



Preview to 2010


....RIP LLLUUUUUUUCC
0

#19 User is offline   trav_have 


  • Canucks Second-Line
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4,693
  • Joined: 27-March 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:33 PM

Eklund gives CDC more ideas to talk about.
I dont really mind him, although he is wrong most of the time. :P

RIP Luc B
0

#20 User is offline   trevor corey 


  • Manitoba Moose Star
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 916
  • Joined: 08-March 07

Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:34 PM

just tag ecklund threads so people have a choice of clicking or not
0

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.