trevor corey, on Jul 2 2009, 11:34 PM, said:
just tag ecklund threads so people have a choice of clicking or not
they will still click it and start flaming about look where we are in CDC
Canucks Community: DOWN WITH EKLUND - Canucks Community
DOWN WITH EKLUND Can we PLEASE clean this section up from this joke?
#21
xXnotoriousXx 
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,150
- Joined: 30-July 08
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:36 PM
they will still click it and start flaming about look where we are in CDC
GO CANUCKS GO
malkin + kobe = CF00
bure = .CM.
messi = tenacious
MultiQuote
#23
AmazingNuck
- Canucks Franchise Player
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 11,556
- Joined: 27-December 06
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:39 PM
I seriously don't understand why we make him a credible source.. but he gets us talking.
#24
Ghostsof1915
- Canucks First-Line
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 6,648
- Joined: 31-January 07
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:41 PM
I've said it before, it would be nice to just have an Eklund sticky...then all the crud goes into one spot.
GO CANUCKS GO!
"The Canucks did not lose in 1994. They just ran out of time.." Barry MacDonald Team1040
"The Canucks did not lose in 1994. They just ran out of time.." Barry MacDonald Team1040
#25
Special Ed
- Canucks Rookie
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,500
- Joined: 09-February 09
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:45 PM
1915is2Luongo, on Jul 2 2009, 11:41 PM, said:
I've said it before, it would be nice to just have an Eklund sticky...then all the crud goes into one spot.
I would be fine with this.
I have only been on this forum for a year and I like rumours it's just that Eklund always seems to have TONS of stuff that either makes no sense or is just plain obvious.
#27
danjr
- Manitoba Moose Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 30-September 06
Posted 03 July 2009 - 12:23 AM
I was going to make a thread like this myself.
The only reason he has any credibility, is because people here keep citing him here as a source.
If people don't use him, he'd fade away to nothing. Or stick him in his own EKLUND RUMOURS THREAD. Then he can have 1 million pages of glory instead of half a forums worth of threads!
The only reason he has any credibility, is because people here keep citing him here as a source.
If people don't use him, he'd fade away to nothing. Or stick him in his own EKLUND RUMOURS THREAD. Then he can have 1 million pages of glory instead of half a forums worth of threads!
#28
Haunted
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,083
- Joined: 30-August 05
Posted 03 July 2009 - 12:30 AM
im not an eklund fan, but of july first he was pretty bang on...beating tsn to the punch a few times...including this one where tsn gives him props for it http://twitter.com/D...atus/2429411884
so don't get your panties in a twist, anything thats a rumor is just a rumor no matter what the source is
so don't get your panties in a twist, anything thats a rumor is just a rumor no matter what the source is
Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.