Sanford back as Backup? - Canucks Community

(3 Pages)
←
1
2
3
→

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Sanford back as Backup? No LaBarbera

#21 >you

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 845
Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 03 July 2009 - 06:15 AM

cuporbust, on Jul 3 2009, 01:42 AM, said:

Shnieder unless he get's traded

great way to develop young talent, playing him 5 games a season, that sure would boost his confidence

#22 Tatoes

Canucks Star

Group: Members
Posts: 8,263
Joined: 25-September 06

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:08 AM

Belfour for either league min or a case of beer.

#23 Salmon Arm Canuck

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 777
Joined: 07-September 08

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:15 AM

19Yzerman19, on Jul 3 2009, 12:49 AM, said:

Andrew Raycroft is a UFA. Toss 7-800k his way to play 10 games this season, decent deal for both sides.

This is a possibility. At least it's better than Sanford. That being said, I think we can find better than Raycroft for the money.

Hammer79, on Jul 3 2009, 03:40 AM, said:

As soon as Luongo gets extended, I'm willing to bet that Schneider will be traded as he's redundant with us. Gillis will probably extend Luongo, trade Schneider, and sign some no-name backup.

Yep! This will happen.

#24 canacks1970

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 773
Joined: 05-March 06

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:34 AM

Hammer79, on Jul 3 2009, 03:40 AM, said:

As soon as Luongo gets extended, I'm willing to bet that Schneider will be traded as he's redundant with us. Gillis will probably extend Luongo, trade Schneider, and sign some no-name backup.

Whats the point of trading Schnieder now? Ok you have no Labarbra, No Sanford, Julien Ellis hasn't been tender and offer. So we have no back up and no depth in that position but you want to trade one of your prospect that has very little trade value because he hasn't proven himself in the big leagues yet. Let him learn from one of the best, and see if we can increase his trade value.

#25 tjkaemingh

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 10-July 03

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:44 AM

I would lock up a veteran back up yet.
If Luongo is going to play 65 games for us next year. somebody else only gets 15+
Schnieder might as well play 65 in the AHL - ONE more year.

15 games as back up here may not be the best for his development (although he has already owned the AHL)

Get Sanford (maybe), Raycroft, Gerber, Belfour, Biron, Legace, - who ever to start the year.

Much depends on IF Luongo signs long term and IF we want to trade Schneider to upgrade somewhere else.

But yes ultimately Schneider can come in and be back up soon, maybe just not to start the year and get rusty.....

#26 sonorJCM

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,299
Joined: 25-February 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 07:52 AM

Isac Rukebov, on Jul 3 2009, 01:29 AM, said:

I doubt Sanford will be back. These goalies want to play.

What goalies want to play? I hope you mean ALL goalies, because they do. Someone still has to be the backup.

QUOTE

QUOTE (Ziostilon @ Jul 26 2009, 04:56 PM)

I'm calling it, Sedin-Sedin-Hodgson for #1 line duty starting in Mid November

#27 Brunners

Salmon Kings Star

Group: Members
Posts: 67
Joined: 01-July 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:01 AM

tjkaemingh, on Jul 3 2009, 03:44 PM, said:

He's got nothing left to prove in the AHL, I reckon if he hasn't been traded by then (which he may well be) he'll be back up - We need to see how he does in the NHL environment, over a longer period of time than last year.

tjkaemingh, on Jul 3 2009, 03:44 PM, said:

Get Sanford (maybe), Raycroft, Gerber, Belfour, Biron, Legace, - who ever to start the year.

Much depends on IF Luongo signs long term and IF we want to trade Schneider to upgrade somewhere else.

But yes ultimately Schneider can come in and be back up soon, maybe just not to start the year and get rusty.....

I'd rather have Raycroft than Sanford. Sanford always made me nervous, he let to many in high.

#28 canucks4cup2008

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 858
Joined: 30-January 08

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:10 AM

We need to showcase Schneider and up his trade value....

#29 canucks.rool and own

Salmon Kings Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: 26-June 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 08:23 AM

LOL Sanford makes you nervous lol

Canucks line up 09/10

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows

Demtria-Kesler-Samuelsson

Bernier-Hodgson-Grabner/raymond

Hordichuk-Johnson-Rypien

Mitchell-Salo

Bieksa-Edler

O'brien-Rome/nycholat

Luongo

Raycroft

#30 StupidityKills

Manitoba Moose Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 308
Joined: 04-December 06

Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:01 AM

canucks.rool and own, on Jul 3 2009, 09:23 AM, said:

LOL Sanford makes you nervous lol

That's funny? :rolleyes:

Please vote & comment daily! Help my friend and his wife who has MS.
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=XAv6YEGbuTs

#31 Bones'Daddy

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 210
Joined: 18-September 08

Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:32 AM

Keep schneider as back up until hes ready to shine, then dish out Luongo to another team for a big name or a few big names, why throw away a young talented goalie that can take over for when Luongo is doe here. And sanford is way to small to be a goalie, the age of small goalies is almost at an end

we live to DIE! So choose wisely, before the choice is made for you!!

#32 TopNuck

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 242
Joined: 01-July 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:33 AM

No way! LaBarbera is where it's at!

#33 row113

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 997
Joined: 23-June 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 12:30 PM

no, he's more of a liability than an asset. His size is a problem. I've seen many goals he conceded that would have been stopped by a bigger goalie, not because of skill, but because he was big enough to block more of the net. I'd rather have schneider, he could do alright as a backup for now.

This is what Kevin Bieksa would look like as a cat.

QUOTE (Canada Dry @ Oct 31 2009, 02:59 AM) Please, the last thing we need is more french people. We already lose enough with the frenchmen we have in already, can you imagine if we added more? We would never win a game again.
yeah, who cares about Luongo and Burrows? They're the reason we lose right?

#34 dajusta

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,234
Joined: 24-January 03

Posted 03 July 2009 - 01:07 PM

Let Cory play for 15 games this year to show his talent, boost up his market value, and trade him to the Sens for Heatley next year.

Matthew 28:18-20

18Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.

#35 Mitchell_08Baby

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,495
Joined: 02-February 09

Posted 03 July 2009 - 03:33 PM

I hope Schneider pulls a Hiller on Luongo

This post has been edited by Mitchell_08Baby: 03 July 2009 - 03:37 PM

#36 CR05BYW0NTH3CUP87

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,154
Joined: 23-August 08

Posted 03 July 2009 - 03:37 PM

We should sign the Gustavason guy Burke wants and screw him up :lol:

The leafs suck, and everyone hates them, Just leave the forum leaf's fans, and get over it. If you agree copy and paste this to you're sig.[/b][/size]

Quote

If Quebec gets an NHL team, Toronto will want one too.