I'm patient and I don't mind Mike Gillis waiting around but is he even looking into a second liner or a puck moving d-man.
What about our RFA's what is their status have they received offers.
Canucks Community: Are the canucks even looking at a second liner and a puck moving d-man - Canucks Community
Page 1 of 1
Are the canucks even looking at a second liner and a puck moving d-man
MultiQuote
#3
- Canucks Second-Line
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4,208
- Joined: 08-July 06
Posted 04 July 2009 - 01:26 PM
Try a search, this didn't need it's own topic.
Second liner? Why? We don't need one now.
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Demitra-Kesler-Samuelsson
Decent top 6 if you ask me. Samuelsson can bring more speed and energy than Sundin did, and Burrows seemed exactly what the twins needed.
As for a puck moving defenceman, they're not cheap, nor are they abundant in supply. Gillis is being careful with his cap space, a concept that seems lost on most people around here. And that's the smartest way to do it. We're not going to roll over other teams next season and win the Presidents trophy, but we're not going to be bottom feeders like a lot of people seem to think.
Second liner? Why? We don't need one now.
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Demitra-Kesler-Samuelsson
Decent top 6 if you ask me. Samuelsson can bring more speed and energy than Sundin did, and Burrows seemed exactly what the twins needed.
As for a puck moving defenceman, they're not cheap, nor are they abundant in supply. Gillis is being careful with his cap space, a concept that seems lost on most people around here. And that's the smartest way to do it. We're not going to roll over other teams next season and win the Presidents trophy, but we're not going to be bottom feeders like a lot of people seem to think.
CDC GM Game Pool - Commissioner/Winnipeg Jets<---Click For Roster
QUOTE (canuck2xtreme @ Oct 26 2009, 03:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't care how good Kopitar gets, I will never believe that drafting Luc Bourdon was a mistake. Never.
#4
- Canucks Prospect
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 1,222
- Joined: 17-November 08
Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:29 PM
canuck2xtreme, on Jul 4 2009, 01:26 PM, said:
Try a search, this didn't need it's own topic.
Second liner? Why? We don't need one now.
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Demitra-Kesler-Samuelsson
Decent top 6 if you ask me. Samuelsson can bring more speed and energy than Sundin did, and Burrows seemed exactly what the twins needed.
As for a puck moving defenceman, they're not cheap, nor are they abundant in supply. Gillis is being careful with his cap space, a concept that seems lost on most people around here. And that's the smartest way to do it. We're not going to roll over other teams next season and win the Presidents trophy, but we're not going to be bottom feeders like a lot of people seem to think.
Second liner? Why? We don't need one now.
Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Demitra-Kesler-Samuelsson
Decent top 6 if you ask me. Samuelsson can bring more speed and energy than Sundin did, and Burrows seemed exactly what the twins needed.
As for a puck moving defenceman, they're not cheap, nor are they abundant in supply. Gillis is being careful with his cap space, a concept that seems lost on most people around here. And that's the smartest way to do it. We're not going to roll over other teams next season and win the Presidents trophy, but we're not going to be bottom feeders like a lot of people seem to think.
I agree...IMO we have a strong chance and winning the Division again...Gillis has kept the main core together and they're all getting better together as a TEAM.
THE CORE
GO CANUCKS GO
Page 1 of 1
Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership. NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P. Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League. All Rights Reserved.