[Rumor] Beauchemin has agreed in principle**

(3 Pages)
←
1
2
3
→

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

#21 Sawchuk

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 27-October 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:35 PM

carlweezer, on Jul 4 2009, 02:29 PM, said:

that sounds DANGROUS!!

Iginla, Heatley, Jokinen, Langkow,Backlund

Regher, Beachemin, Bouwmeester

Kipper

Indeed. That would make them better than last year for sure
Bouwmeester > Phaneuf
Heatley > Cammaleri
Beauchemin > Aucoin

You've got to play sixty minutes to get my record" - Terry Sawchuk

#22 crazyforhockey

Canucks Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 2,251
Joined: 28-March 07

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:36 PM

CanucksWino, on Jul 4 2009, 02:22 PM, said:

It this is true (I'm not convinced) there's one team that's in cap trouble and has pubicly stated that they're looking for a shutdown defenseman. And that team is the Chicago Blackhawks.

Other teams in cap trouble include: Boston, Calgary, Detroit, Philly, Pittsburgh and San Jose.

Thats who I thought of right away..for the reasons you stated.

#23 Mikey2Dope

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 228
Joined: 08-March 03

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:40 PM

This source seems completely fake.

"my rules, I cant get identified, my sources are primary as I have a front office job in the NHL, all reports confirmed 2 source min"

"side note congrats to TBay for turning things around, a long ways away from the 6 years i spent with them in the early 90s"

"Twittering out of New Jersey"

Wouldn't all this information give away who this person is to the NHL?

#24 madeincanada

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 603
Joined: 31-January 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:42 PM

carlweezer, on Jul 4 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

http://twitter.com/The_Inside_Job

Apparentltly Beauchemin has verbally agreed to sign with a team with cap issues, Beauchemin has given them 48 hrs to properly give him an offer and to make a trade so that theya re not in cap issues.

Also Anaheim has lowballed him

the dominos are starting to fall!

I really really like what Beauchemin has done here, he has been very very patient, waited until Team Canada named him to the summer roster and let his stock grow..

I wonder what team he has chosen, Philly? SJ to stay in California? Calgary? ahah can you imagine!

Beauchemin has to be one of the most overrated players in the league.

Lets take a look

Beauchemin
2008-09
GP: 20
G:4
A:1
P:5
+/-: -3

Beauchemin missed 69 games with a torn ACL this past season, 5 points in 20 games for a projected 20 points in a full season. -3 playing with an offensively powerful Anaheim Ducks squad and a good young goaltender in Jonas Hiller. Why in the hell is there so much hype for this guy?

#25 Spectre

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,072
Joined: 05-July 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:42 PM

Ahh man! He's agreed to play with a team! I would have thought he was going to retire and pursue figure skating!! WOW!! ...with a team.

#26 canadiangunner

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 212
Joined: 17-September 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:52 PM

Disaronno, on Jul 4 2009, 01:14 PM, said:

You are foolish for even putting Calgary in your list of teams.

I am going to say either the Kings or Toronto.

And your foolish for putting kings or toronto as they don't have cap problems.

#27 Happy Gilmore

Canucks Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 1,075
Joined: 26-June 07

Posted 04 July 2009 - 02:56 PM

This "Inside Job" source seems pretty fake to me.

#28 ImpossibleMan

Manitoba Moose Prospect

Group: Members
Posts: 151
Joined: 08-April 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:15 PM

I wouldnt be surprised if Tampa offered him a 4mil contract.
They seem to be focusing on rebuilding their D

edit: or The flyers.

This post has been edited by ImpossibleMan: 04 July 2009 - 03:17 PM

#29 WhY So SeRiOuS

Canucks Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 2,691
Joined: 20-February 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:23 PM

Why would he go to a team with Cap issues??

Thanks For The Sig Vogue
2,000 Post June/13/09

R.I.P Luc Bourdon,Micheal Jackson,Billy Mays
Never Click Here!
Formerly known as S.Bernier.18

#30 TheJoker19

Canucks Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 2,446
Joined: 03-March 09

Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:25 PM

Sawchuk, on Jul 4 2009, 02:35 PM, said:

Indeed. That would make them better than last year for sure
Bouwmeester > Phaneuf
Heatley > Cammaleri
Beauchemin > Aucoin

they don't have either of them

credit : uɐpɹoɾ
Oldname: Hodgson19Naslund

#31 carlweezer

Manitoba Moose Star

Group: Members
Posts: 919
Joined: 18-July 06

Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:29 PM

S.Bernier.18, on Jul 4 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

Why would he go to a team with Cap issues??

why not he is a free agent, and a lot of the teams with cap issues are great places to play with a great fan base,(philly, montreal, detroit, chicago) so if a team can afford him and fit him under the cap then he wont care if they have cap issues or not

#32 CoHo_Grabner2010

Canucks Rookie

Group: Members
Posts: 1,589
Joined: 19-January 09

Posted 04 July 2009 - 03:58 PM

Lambchops, on Jul 4 2009, 02:16 PM, said:

seems like a 'Burke' type of player

ya seeing as how he has been a duck for a while I guess so lol

#33 Tannie

Canucks Rookie

Group: Members
Posts: 1,724
Joined: 29-December 03

Posted 04 July 2009 - 04:00 PM

I thought salary cap issues weren't a big deal in the summer, until some time in September (before pre-season, isn't it?)?

Or is the team wanting to make sure they can trade someone so they don't get stuck with a crappy trade...

#34 playboi19

Canucks Star

Group: Members
Posts: 8,091
Joined: 15-August 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 04:04 PM

Sather again. <_<

#35 LuongoG1

Canucks Rookie

Group: Members
Posts: 1,606
Joined: 03-April 07

Posted 04 July 2009 - 04:30 PM

Boston, can't land Kaberle so they're going after Beachemin.

New York Rangers, cause Sather doesn't understand the concept of long term contracts hampering him in the future cap wise.

My number one guess though is the Flyers, considering how much they gave up for Pronger, I think they're going for broke and giving up all their assets to go for it all in one season.

#36 DefCon1

Canucks Third-Line

Group: Members
Posts: 3,264
Joined: 13-June 08

Posted 04 July 2009 - 05:51 PM

LuongoG1, on Jul 4 2009, 04:30 PM, said:

Boston, can't land Kaberle so they're going after Beachemin.

New York Rangers, cause Sather doesn't understand the concept of long term contracts hampering him in the future cap wise.

My number one guess though is the Flyers, considering how much they gave up for Pronger, I think they're going for broke and giving up all their assets to go for it all in one season.

With Emery to back them up :lol:

QUOTE (Rye and Kesler @ Jun 29 2009, 10:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Where is Celebrities? I am tryin to find it on Club vibes but i can't find it. Is it relatively new? Sounds good though we will have to check it out.

QUOTE (pacecar @ Aug 2 2009, 11:53 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Sheep are ok but horses, ewww.

#37 Glory Days

Canucks Star

Group: Members
Posts: 9,842
Joined: 04-June 06

Posted 04 July 2009 - 05:58 PM

Take away Nieds and Pronger and wake up kids. One of the most over rated Dman in the NHL besides Bowm.

#38 Luongo = Cup

Canucks Third-Line

Group: Members
Posts: 3,115
Joined: 28-June 06

Posted 04 July 2009 - 06:21 PM

madeincanada, on Jul 4 2009, 02:42 PM, said:

Sorry, but this a post by someone who has no clue what they're talking about. There's a reason he was invited to team canada's camp and none of the canucks d were. Mitchell and Bieksa are the overrated ones.

I was wrong. The Sedins are legit superstars and are IRREPLACEABLE.
Common Myths:
1. A 2 way contract means you can be sent down without clearing waivers. False - All it means is you get paid an ahl salary if sent down and has nothing to do with waivers.
2. You can buyout a player any time during the year. False - There's a specific buyout period window when teams are allowed to buyout players.
3. Sending a rookie down before they played 10 nhl games saves a year on their entry level contract. False - This only applies to CHL players like hodgson who aren't 20 yet and not to players like Shirokov.

#39 MGaborik

Canucks Franchise Player

Group: Members
Posts: 10,487
Joined: 02-July 07

Posted 04 July 2009 - 06:27 PM

S.Bernier.18, on Jul 4 2009, 03:23 PM, said:

Why would he go to a team with Cap issues??

Wth? Who cares if they have cap issues, if he wants to go there and they offer him a contract, he'll go there. If they want him, obviously they'll make room for him..

... <_<

PSN ID : ChickenFTW | MW2 , NHL10
Posted Image

Credit to ac7 For Making my Sig and Credit to Ericaa for Making my Ub!

#40 KevinB

Manitoba Moose Regular

Group: Members
Posts: 373
Joined: 18-April 09

Posted 04 July 2009 - 07:16 PM

carlweezer, on Jul 4 2009, 02:29 PM, said:

that sounds DANGROUS!!

Iginla, Heatley, Jokinen, Langkow,Backlund

Regher, Beachemin, Bouwmeester

Kipper

They don't have the cap space for all those players... not even close. And you don't even know if Backlund will make the team, I watched him play Junior in Kelowna, he's a great player but I don't know if he'll make the NHL first try.

Credit to Intensity

(3 Pages)
←
1
2
3
→

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Canucks Community: [Rumor] Beauchemin has agreed in principle** - Canucks Community