Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

shazzam

Hamhuis or Weber

   206 members have voted

  1. 1. Hamhuis or Weber

    • Hamhuis
      31
    • Weber
      175

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

60 posts in this topic

I know alot of people on this board like Weber, lets say Nashville made Weber available

Would you sign UFA Hamhuis for 4.5 mill or trade a bunch of assets for Weber (also makes 4.5 mil)?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Webber by allot ( depending on what it took). Hamhuis will be a great D man here though

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weber.. I'd be willing to give up a lot for him. Whereas Bieksa thinks he can shoot through people.. Weber can actually shoot through things.. (talking about the net) hahah..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WEBERRR one of the few players I'd be willing to give up a lot for but I don't see why Nashville would trade their franchise player

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weber for sure, well depending what we had to give up. Hamhuis would be fine too though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weber ftw!

The guy shot the puck THROUGH the net!

4EE49A6C9EF68B13F76200_Large.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd have to overpay for Weber in terms of trading assets, and you might have to overpay Hamhuis (dollar-wise) because he's an UFA. BUT, since he's from Smithers, and he MIGHT want to play here... he may take less than market value to play for the nucks. But that all depends on what people are willing to pay him on the market, and what we are willing to pay for him as well. If the market doesn't match our price (lets say ppl over 5 yr/30 million), I think that's an overpayment and then we wouldn't get him. But if the market's around 5-ish/year, we can probably get him for 4-4.5. Weber... we gotta wait til he's an UFA I think... by then, I'd think we'd be paying 6-7 for him

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get them both. 1 Dman won't be enough to magically fix us.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what they want for Weber and I think Hamhuis can be signed for 4 million.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Hamhuis has a better chance to be with the Canucks, but I'd rather have Weber here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would give Kesler, Bieksa and a 1st or 2nd round pick for Weber.

-4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would give Kesler, Bieksa and a 1st or 2nd round pick for Weber.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hamhuis is more realistic. Weber went to my high school with me. he was a dick to everyone. hahahaha but that doesn't stop me from being a huge fan!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weber, easily. A stud defenseman like Weber is what this team needs to be a topflight contender. Say we had to give up Edler, Hodgson and a 1st; I'd still do it. In fact, trade anyone other than the Sedins and Kesler, and this team would immediately become the favourite to come out of the west (assuming Chicago isn't the same team next year). Conversely, if you add Hamhuis without subtracting anyone, we would look good but we still wouldn't have improved much. We'd still be missing that #1 defenseman.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would trade ANY player on our team except the sedins, for Weber. Including Kesler, Hodgson, Luongo.

-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.