• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

canuckster19

[Signing] Canucks sign Dan Hamhuis

350 posts in this topic

Dan Hamhuis is closing in on a long-term deal and four teams are still in the running, but the Vancouver Canucks are pushing hard and appear to be the frontrunner. The signing should be completed within the next hour or so. More to come.

RT @morrisonHNIC Looking like Hamhuis to Vancouver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dan Hamhuis is closing in on a long-term deal and four teams are still in the running, but the Vancouver Canucks are pushing hard and appear to be the frontrunner. The signing should be completed within the next hour or so. More to come.

http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/34339-Vancouver-Canucks-close-to-signing-free-agent-defenseman-Dan-Hamhuis.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$24M over 6 years? I would jump on something like that if he were willing, but I doubt we get him that cheap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awsome! Now who goes, Mitchell or Bieksa?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we sign Hamhuis, Bieksa is gone. We still have to resign Raymond which will be take up all the cap space

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Dan, we need your presence with Ballard.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awsome! Now who goes, Mitchell or Bieksa?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's got nothing to do with Mitchell. It's already a foregone conclusion that we won't be re-signing him. If we sign Hamhuis then MG MUST move Juice, and probably won't get a lot for him because everyone will know that he has to be moved.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm... can we just not re-sign O'Brien and save close to 2M dollars?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we sign Hamhuis, Bieksa is gone. We still have to resign Raymond which will be take up all the cap space

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm biting my nails here.

If we don't land Hamhuis, apart from being disappointed, I have a feeling we'll move Bieksa to get a fresh face on defence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Top 4 would be:

Hamhuis-Ehrhoff

Ballard-Edler

Bieksa traded, and we'd still have Salo too!

C'mon Hammer!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mitchell is already gone, so to speak, of course they have to trade Bieksa, or somehow move Salo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have only $7 million left and we have to sign O'Brien, Raymond, Hansen, Glass.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.