Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

CDCGML 2011-12 Season


canuck2xtreme

Recommended Posts

The Blues Tonight

1 A +1 2 Pim 7 PTS

Wellman 0

Thomas Win = 10 PTS

MacDonald +2 = 4 PTS

Staios scratch

Erat 1 G 1 PPA GWG +1 = 11 PTS

Legwand 0

Klein SHA +1 = 9 PTS

Wilson 0

Sanford did not played

Bogosian scratch

Iginla 1 PPG = 4 PTS

Butler 0

Prosser non roster

Neil 2 Pim = 2 PTS

Michalek 0

47 Points...solid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you open the team sheet in Google Docs and hover the cursor over the player's "Expires" column entry (you will see an orange triangle in the top right corner of the box - hover over this), it will show conditions of the contract.

Hope that helps.....and that I explained it in a way you can understand.... :)

Edit: DAMN YOU TGC......BEAT ME AGAIN!!!!! :lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit, I'm getting pretty annoyed at GMs arguing in the thread. Take it outside, boys.

My biggest pet peeve though is one GM criticizing another GM's moves. If I read someone slagging my organizational strategy I would cross them off of my 'happy to deal with list.' That's bad GMing to give yourself that reputation, IMHO.

I've refrained from saying anything till this point because I had hoped that it would sort itself out but it's too often I need to read discussions that have no content other than a he said, she said.

We don't need to read your every opinion. Save it for the offseason, please.

/ End Rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waivers: The Montreal Canadiens have placed F Kevin Westgarth on waivers, with the intention of sending him down to the North Dakota Fighting Sioux.

LTIR Activation: Once the roster spot has been opened from the Westgarth waiver placement, the Montreal Canadiens would like to activate F Alex Tanguay from the injured reserve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit, I'm getting pretty annoyed at GMs arguing in the thread. Take it outside, boys.

My biggest pet peeve though is one GM criticizing another GM's moves. If I read someone slagging my organizational strategy I would cross them off of my 'happy to deal with list.' That's bad GMing to give yourself that reputation, IMHO.

I've refrained from saying anything till this point because I had hoped that it would sort itself out but it's too often I need to read discussions that have no content other than a he said, she said.

We don't need to read your every opinion. Save it for the offseason, please.

/ End Rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...