Tm085 Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 lol i think it's a pretty safe bet that edler isn't going to crack 80 points so the 82 or 83 point argument is kind of pointless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordiques_fan Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Lol!! My thread was hijacked! Oh well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 3, 2011 Author Share Posted November 3, 2011 Lol!! My thread was hijacked! Oh well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 4, 2011 Author Share Posted November 4, 2011 1 - 5 [6 6 1] 13....................................[6 3 3] 15 *Edit: Booth's stats account for Florida now. VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 13 GP 5 G 10 A 15 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 31 G 63 A 94 P 12 +/- Sedin.H 13 GP 4 G 10 A 14 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 25 G 63 A 88 P 25 +/- Edler.A 13 GP 3 G 9 A 12 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 56 A 75 P 6 +/- Higgins.C 13 GP 6 G 2 A 8 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 37 G 12 A 50 P -12 +/- Salo.S 12 GP 3 G 5 A 8 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 81 GP 20 G 33 A 54 P 40 +/- Burrows.A 13 GP 4 G 3 A 7 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 25 G 18 A 44 P 31 +/- Hodgson.C 13 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 12 A 31 P -6 +/- Lapierre 13 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 12 A 31 P 18 +/- Kesler.R 8 GP 1 G 4 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 9 G 38 A 48 P 0 +/- Malhotra.M 13 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 31 A 31 P -63 +/- Hamhuis.D 13 GP 1 G 3 A 4 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 18 A 25 P -6 +/- Hansen.J 13 GP 1 G 3 A 4 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 18 A 25 P -44 +/- Weise.D 13 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 12 A 18 P 6 +/- Bieksa.K 13 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 18 A 18 P -44 +/- Booth.D 11 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 21 A 21 P -58 +/- Ballard.K 13 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -9 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 0 A 6 P -56 +/- Ebbett.A 2 GP 0 G 1 A 1 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 71 GP 0 G 35 A 35 P 0 +/- Alberts.A 7 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 76 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -32 +/- Volpatti.A 12 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 81 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -6 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -24 +/- Sulzer.A 4 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 73 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 0 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KING ALBERTS Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 These projections are based on a linear graph, you really need more complex mathmatics to produce a realistic prediction. You are basing your predictions on the results of the first month of a notoriously slow starting team. Since it is readily apparant that the Canucks as a group have been playing well below their potential you could produce statistical analysis based on a compound curve in performance. The only guys on the team a linear graph works for are the Sedins as their production remains fairly constant throughout the entirety of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opmac Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 1 - 5 [6 6 1] 13....................................[6 3 3] 15 *Edit: Booth's stats account for Florida now. VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 13 GP 5 G 10 A 15 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 31 G 63 A 94 P 12 +/- Sedin.H 13 GP 4 G 10 A 14 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 25 G 63 A 88 P 25 +/- Edler.A 13 GP 3 G 9 A 12 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 56 A 75 P 6 +/- Higgins.C 13 GP 6 G 2 A 8 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 37 G 12 A 50 P -12 +/- Salo.S 12 GP 3 G 5 A 8 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 81 GP 20 G 33 A 54 P 40 +/- Burrows.A 13 GP 4 G 3 A 7 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 25 G 18 A 44 P 31 +/- Hodgson.C 13 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 12 A 31 P -6 +/- Lapierre 13 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 12 A 31 P 18 +/- Kesler.R 8 GP 1 G 4 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 9 G 38 A 48 P 0 +/- Malhotra.M 13 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 31 A 31 P -63 +/- Hamhuis.D 13 GP 1 G 3 A 4 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 18 A 25 P -6 +/- Hansen.J 13 GP 1 G 3 A 4 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 18 A 25 P -44 +/- Weise.D 13 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 12 A 18 P 6 +/- Bieksa.K 13 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 18 A 18 P -44 +/- Booth.D 11 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 21 A 21 P -58 +/- Ballard.K 13 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -9 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 6 G 0 A 6 P -56 +/- Ebbett.A 2 GP 0 G 1 A 1 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 71 GP 0 G 35 A 35 P 0 +/- Alberts.A 7 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 76 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -32 +/- Volpatti.A 12 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 81 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -6 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -24 +/- Sulzer.A 4 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 73 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 0 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 5, 2011 Author Share Posted November 5, 2011 2 - 3[6 7 1] 13....................................[6 6 0] 12 VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 14 GP 5 G 10 A 15 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 29 G 58 A 87 P 5 +/- Sedin.H 14 GP 4 G 10 A 14 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 23 G 58 A 82 P 11 +/- Edler.A 14 GP 3 G 10 A 13 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 17 G 58 A 76 P -5 +/- Higgins.C 14 GP 6 G 2 A 8 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 35 G 11 A 46 P -5 +/- Burrows.A 14 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 29 G 17 A 46 P 35 +/- Salo.S 12 GP 3 G 5 A 8 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 20 G 33 A 53 P 40 +/- Kesler.R 9 GP 2 G 4 A 6 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 17 G 34 A 51 P 8 +/- Lapierre 14 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 17 G 11 A 29 P 17 +/- Hodgson.C 14 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 17 G 11 A 29 P -17 +/- Hamhuis.D 14 GP 1 G 4 A 5 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 23 A 29 P -17 +/- Malhotra.M 14 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 29 A 29 P -58 +/- Hansen.J 14 GP 1 G 3 A 4 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 17 A 23 P -46 +/- Weise.D 14 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 11 A 17 P 0 +/- Booth.D 12 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -9 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 20 A 20 P -60 +/- Bieksa.K 14 GP 0 G 3 A 3 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 17 A 17 P -46 +/- Ballard.K 14 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -9 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 0 A 5 P -52 +/- Ebbett.A 3 GP 0 G 1 A 1 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 71 GP 0 G 23 A 23 P -23 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 73 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 14 +/- Alberts.A 8 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 76 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -28 +/- Volpatti.A 12 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -6 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 71 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -23 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 The skaters stats look nice and balanced, but our goalies are in trouble if they keep this up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordiques_fan Posted November 5, 2011 Share Posted November 5, 2011 Haha sorry, I made this thread because I really liked your idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 14, 2011 Author Share Posted November 14, 2011 4 - 1[9 8 1] 19....................................[4 7 3] 11 Purple = 1 point Blue = 2 points Red = 3+ points VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 18 GP 6 G 16 A 22 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 27 G 73 A 100 P 18 +/- Sedin.H 18 GP 6 G 14 A 20 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 27 G 64 A 91 P 23 +/- Edler.A 18 GP 3 G 13 A 16 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 14 G 59 A 73 P -5 +/- Higgins.C 18 GP 6 G 4 A 10 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 27 G 18 A 45 P -14 +/- Salo.S 15 GP 4 G 6 A 10 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 79 GP 21 G 32 A 53 P 26 +/- Hodgson.C 18 GP 4 G 5 A 9 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 23 A 41 P -5 +/- Hamhuis.D 18 GP 2 G 7 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 9 G 32 A 41 P -9 +/- Burrows.A 16 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 25 G 15 A 40 P 30 +/- Booth.D 16 GP 2 G 6 A 8 P -11 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 10 G 30 A 40 P -55 +/- Hansen.J 18 GP 4 G 3 A 7 P -4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 18 G 14 A 32 P -18 +/- Kesler.R 13 GP 2 G 5 A 7 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 12 G 30 A 42 P 0 +/- Lapierre 18 GP 3 G 3 A 6 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 14 G 14 A 28 P 9 +/- Bieksa.K 18 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 23 A 28 P -36 +/- Rome.A 4 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 51 G 34 A 85 P 51 +/- Malhotra.M 18 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 23 A 23 P -46 +/- Weise.D 18 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 9 A 14 P -9 +/- Ebbett.A 5 GP 1 G 1 A 2 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 69 GP 14 G 14 A 28 P -14 +/- Ballard.K 18 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 5 G 0 A 5 P -46 +/- Alberts.A 9 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 73 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -24 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 69 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 14 +/- Volpatti.A 16 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -10 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 67 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -22 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanCityNuck Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Rome on pace for 51 goals, 85 points #Vote4Rome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 17, 2011 Author Share Posted November 17, 2011 1 - 5[9 9 1] 19....................................[12 4 3] 27 Purple = 1 point Blue = 2 points Red = 3+ points VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 19 GP 6 G 17 A 23 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 26 G 73 A 99 P 22 +/- Sedin.H 19 GP 6 G 15 A 21 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 26 G 65 A 91 P 26 +/- Edler.A 19 GP 3 G 13 A 16 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 13 G 56 A 69 P -9 +/- Higgins.C 19 GP 6 G 4 A 10 P -5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 26 G 17 A 43 P -22 +/- Salo.S 16 GP 4 G 6 A 10 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 79 GP 20 G 30 A 50 P 15 +/- Hodgson.C 19 GP 4 G 5 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 17 G 22 A 39 P -9 +/- Hamhuis.D 19 GP 2 G 7 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 9 G 30 A 39 P -9 +/- Burrows.A 17 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 24 G 14 A 38 P 24 +/- Hansen.J 19 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 22 G 13 A 35 P -13 +/- Booth.D 17 GP 2 G 6 A 8 P -12 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 9 G 28 A 37 P -56 +/- Kesler.R 14 GP 2 G 5 A 7 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 11 G 28 A 39 P -11 +/- Lapierre 19 GP 3 G 3 A 6 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 13 G 13 A 26 P 4 +/- Bieksa.K 19 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 22 A 26 P -30 +/- Rome.A 5 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 41 G 27 A 68 P 14 +/- Malhotra.M 19 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 22 A 22 P -43 +/- Weise.D 19 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 9 A 13 P -9 +/- Ebbett.A 5 GP 1 G 1 A 2 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 14 G 14 A 28 P -14 +/- Ballard.K 19 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 0 A 4 P -43 +/- Alberts.A 9 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -24 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 14 +/- Volpatti.A 17 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -9 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 66 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -22 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Without a healthy Kesler this team is on pace for mediocrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dura_mater Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 These projections are based on a linear graph, you really need more complex mathmatics to produce a realistic prediction. You are basing your predictions on the results of the first month of a notoriously slow starting team. Since it is readily apparant that the Canucks as a group have been playing well below their potential you could produce statistical analysis based on a compound curve in performance. The only guys on the team a linear graph works for are the Sedins as their production remains fairly constant throughout the entirety of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Projections are different from predictions, I don't think many readers of this thread realize that. "On pace for" is merely for fun and are rarely ever accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 21, 2011 Author Share Posted November 21, 2011 2 - 1[10 9 1] 21....................................[10 9 2] 22 Vancouver CanucksPoints: 21 19thG/G: 2.90 7thG/A: 2.80 17th5-5 F/A: 0.80 24thPP%: 26.7 1stPK%: 85.4 11thFO%: 52.3 4th Purple = 1 point Blue = 2 points Red = 3+ points VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 20 GP 6 G 18 A 24 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 25 G 74 A 99 P 21 +/- Sedin.H 20 GP 7 G 15 A 22 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 29 G 62 A 91 P 25 +/- Edler.A 20 GP 3 G 13 A 16 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 12 G 53 A 65 P -8 +/- Higgins.C 20 GP 7 G 4 A 11 P -5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 29 G 16 A 45 P -21 +/- Salo.S 17 GP 4 G 7 A 11 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 79 GP 19 G 33 A 52 P 19 +/- Hamhuis.D 20 GP 2 G 8 A 10 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 8 G 33 A 41 P -4 +/- Hodgson.C 20 GP 4 G 5 A 9 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 16 G 21 A 37 P -4 +/- Burrows.A 18 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 22 G 13 A 35 P 18 +/- Hansen.J 20 GP 5 G 3 A 8 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 21 G 12 A 33 P -12 +/- Kesler.R 15 GP 2 G 6 A 8 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 10 G 31 A 41 P -15 +/- Booth.D 18 GP 2 G 6 A 8 P -12 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 9 G 27 A 36 P -53 +/- Lapierre 20 GP 3 G 3 A 6 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 12 G 12 A 24 P 4 +/- Bieksa.K 20 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 21 A 25 P -29 +/- Rome.A 6 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 34 G 23 A 57 P 0 +/- Malhotra.M 20 GP 0 G 5 A 5 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 0 G 21 A 21 P -41 +/- Weise.D 20 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 8 A 12 P -8 +/- Ebbett.A 5 GP 1 G 1 A 2 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 67 GP 13 G 13 A 26 P -13 +/- Ballard.K 19 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 81 GP 4 G 0 A 4 P -43 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 67 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 13 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 65 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -22 +/- Volpatti.A 18 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -9 +/- Alberts.A 10 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -29 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MashedBananas Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Rome.A 6 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 34 G 23 A 57 P 0 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 24, 2011 Author Share Posted November 24, 2011 3 - 0 [11 9 1] 23....................................[9 12 1] 19 Vancouver CanucksPoints: 23 +2 19thG/G: 2.90 +0 9thG/A: 2.67 -0.13 14th5-5 F/A: 0.85 +0.05 22thPP%: 25.8 -0.9 1stPK%: 86.0 +0.6 8thFO%: 52.4 +0.1 3rd Purple = 1 point Blue = 2 points Red = 3+ points VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 21 GP 6 G 18 A 24 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 23 G 70 A 93 P 23 +/- Sedin.H 21 GP 7 G 15 A 22 P 7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 27 G 59 A 86 P 27 +/- Edler.A 21 GP 3 G 13 A 16 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 12 G 51 A 63 P -8 +/- Higgins.C 21 GP 7 G 4 A 11 P -4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 27 G 16 A 43 P -16 +/- Salo.S 18 GP 4 G 7 A 11 P 4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 79 GP 18 G 31 A 49 P 18 +/- Hamhuis.D 21 GP 2 G 9 A 11 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 8 G 35 A 43 P 8 +/- Hodgson.C 21 GP 4 G 6 A 10 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 16 G 23 A 39 P 0 +/- Burrows.A 19 GP 6 G 3 A 9 P 5 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 25 G 13 A 38 P 21 +/- Hansen.J 21 GP 5 G 4 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 20 G 16 A 36 P -8 +/- Kesler.R 16 GP 3 G 6 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 14 G 29 A 43 P -10 +/- Booth.D 19 GP 2 G 6 A 8 P -11 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 8 G 25 A 33 P -46 +/- Lapierre 21 GP 3 G 3 A 6 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 12 G 12 A 24 P 4 +/- Bieksa.K 21 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 20 A 24 P -16 +/- Malhotra.M 21 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -9 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 20 A 24 P -35 +/- Rome.A 7 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 68 GP 29 G 19 A 48 P 0 +/- Weise.D 21 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 8 A 12 P -8 +/- Ebbett.A 5 GP 1 G 1 A 2 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 66 GP 13 G 13 A 26 P -13 +/- Ballard.K 19 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 4 G 0 A 4 P -42 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 66 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 13 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 64 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -21 +/- Volpatti.A 19 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -8 +/- Alberts.A 11 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -4 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -26 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitpotpit Posted November 26, 2011 Author Share Posted November 26, 2011 5 - 0 [12 9 1] 25....................................[11 7 3] 25 Vancouver CanucksPoints: 25 +2 15thG/G: 3.00 +0.10 7thG/A: 2.54 -0.13 12th5-5 F/A: 0.98 +0.13 20thPP%: 24.5 -1.3 1stPK%: 86.5 +0.5 6thFO%: 52.5 +0.1 3rd Purple = 1 point Blue = 2 points Red = 3+ points VANCOUVER CANUCKS Sedin.D 22 GP 6 G 19 A 25 P 7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 22 G 71 A 93 P 26 +/- Sedin.H 22 GP 7 G 16 A 23 P 8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 26 G 60 A 86 P 30 +/- Edler.A 22 GP 3 G 13 A 16 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 11 G 48 A 59 P 0 +/- Salo.S 19 GP 5 G 7 A 12 P 6 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 79 GP 21 G 29 A 50 P 25 +/- Higgins.C 22 GP 7 G 4 A 11 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 26 G 15 A 41 P -7 +/- Kesler.R 17 GP 4 G 7 A 11 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 77 GP 18 G 32 A 50 P 0 +/- Hodgson.C 22 GP 4 G 7 A 11 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 15 G 26 A 41 P 4 +/- Hamhuis.D 22 GP 2 G 9 A 11 P 3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 7 G 34 A 41 P 11 +/- Burrows.A 20 GP 7 G 3 A 10 P 7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 28 G 12 A 40 P 28 +/- Hansen.J 22 GP 5 G 4 A 9 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 19 G 15 A 34 P -7 +/- Booth.D 20 GP 3 G 6 A 9 P -10 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 12 G 24 A 36 P -40 +/- Lapierre 22 GP 4 G 3 A 7 P 2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 15 G 11 A 26 P 7 +/- Bieksa.K 22 GP 1 G 6 A 7 P -3 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 22 A 26 P -11 +/- Malhotra.M 22 GP 1 G 5 A 6 P -7 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 19 A 23 P -26 +/- Rome.A 7 GP 3 G 2 A 5 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 67 GP 29 G 19 A 48 P 0 +/- Weise.D 22 GP 1 G 2 A 3 P 0 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 82 GP 4 G 7 A 11 P 0 +/- Ebbett.A 5 GP 1 G 1 A 2 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 65 GP 13 G 13 A 26 P -13 +/- Ballard.K 20 GP 1 G 0 A 1 P -8 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 4 G 0 A 4 P -32 +/- Sulzer.A 5 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 65 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P 13 +/- Tanev.C 3 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -1 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 63 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -21 +/- Volpatti.A 20 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 80 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -8 +/- Alberts.A 12 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -2 +/- ON PACE FOR ===> 72 GP 0 G 0 A 0 P -12 +/- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one-x Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 lol hank is going to score more than daniel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.