Chimon Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 3) and also if we do have draft picks I think you should keep it to Rounds 1-3 , easier to manage 90 new players as opposed to 150. maybe Rounds 1-2 is all we really need, because half of the time, draft picks from 3-5 are recklessly traded around and just adds unjustified clutter to trades Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklax Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 I think all current injuries should be void. This isn't real life. but thats just me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InSoM- Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Yeah, I fixed that - I just meant the current injuries like Crosby's concussion, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Again Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Dislike. This punishes GMs who do their homework and go the extra mile to try to draft late round gems. WTF? All players exist. Just because you didn't have the foresight to pick real life, off-the-board players doesn't mean other teams aren't allowed. OTB prospects can easily be verified via sites like eliteprospects anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazz Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 1) does simming games take up huge amounts of time? 2) and will you have scouting reports like C.Schneider did or just will you just post descriptions of players at 3 intervals : beginning, middle, end with their potential, play-styles, rankings etc... *I think the latter is better 3) and also if we do have draft picks I think you should keep it to Rounds 1-3 , easier to manage 90 new players as opposed to 150. maybe Rounds 1-2 is all we really need, because half of the time, draft picks from 3-5 are recklessly traded around and just adds unjustified clutter to trades, plus its hard to draft gems during rounds 3-5 b/c these players don't really exist 4) will it be 2 or 3 sim days per real day ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazz Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 Why does this ass have a team when there are so many other DECENT members without one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimon Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 thats not what i mean adding an extra 60 players only adds extra work for Krazz to go through and how do you "do your homework" if these players don't exist, the basis of you picking the players if from scouting reports, rankings and descriptions e.g. in CDC STHS schneider didn't bother posting descriptions of players pass 60 (i think) , so essentially your just blind drafting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Again Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Not blind; Some of us actually look at the stats of players past 60 and don't go BPA (which is essentially blind IMO). Many GMs also scout beyond 2 rounds. Players that exist in the real world but don't show up in the EHM Rankings still exist in EHM, they're just unranked. Also, it's possible to create players as it is done with prospects that aren't inherently in the sim from the beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 CDC Username: Daniel Carcillo Contact e-mail: ym-cdc.money@hotmail.com Past experiences in fantasy hockey: RGMG, RGMG 2K12, CDCGML, Various Sim Leagues Preferred Team #1: Washington Capitals Preferred Team #2: St. Louis Blues If you were hired for Preferred Team #1, what are your realistic goals for the team in the coming 2-3 seasons? Winning the Stanley Cup. With the core Washington has along with it's abundance of young players, I believe I can guide them to the right to direction, and that's winning a Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazz Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 I think he means current NHL injuries. GMs who want teams like PIT (Crosby - Concussion) will be starting with one foot in a bucket, so to speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanye West Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 It's what I'm saying. Just because GM Mike Gillis is replaced by Stutter doesn't mean that Mason Raymond is "magically" able to play. Much like how when Mike Gillis replaced Dave Nonis, Sami Salo still retained his NTC. If there are enough draft eligible players "in real life," there will be no need for EHM generated prospects. Unfortunately, we're currently full. If you'd like, I can put you down on the waitlist and contact you when a spot opens up in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Again Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 If there are enough draft eligible players "in real life," there will be no need for EHM generated prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazz Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 so can we do what Chimon did in the last draft? he drafted a player that wasn't ranked for the sim, but is ranked highly in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimon Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 thing is you can't scout all players past 60 so the ones you do choose to scout are scouted blindly and if they happen to be a gem you are very lucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Again Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 oh so the prospect eligibility will be based on real life prospects and their respective rankings? and unranked/ undrafted players e.g. Tanev, Datsyuk etc etc... thing with those unranked/undrafted players is will their potential be geared to where they are picked (if the player is unranked) or on their future sucess b/c i could see a problem of someone picking the next datysuk, that doesn't produce in the real life NHL for 5 years, thereby meaning the basis of his ratings and potential in the sim wouldn't have any correlation to the real life player *granted development will be different between real life and the sim so like as of now, kind of like: 1) yakupov 2) grigorenko 3) murray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krazz Posted November 9, 2011 Author Share Posted November 9, 2011 oh so the prospect eligibility will be based on real life prospects and their respective rankings? so like as of now, kind of like: 1) yakupov 2) grigorenko 3) murray Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimon Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 oh so the prospect eligibility will be based on real life prospects and their respective rankings? and unranked/ undrafted players e.g. Tanev, Datsyuk etc etc... thing with those unranked/undrafted players is will their potential be geared to where they are picked (if the player is unranked) or on their future sucess b/c i could see a problem of someone picking the next datysuk, that doesn't produce in the real life NHL for 5 years, thereby meaning the basis of his ratings and potential in the sim wouldn't have any correlation to the real life player *granted development will be different between real life and the sim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Try Again Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 I would suggest that if GMs pick an unranked player, that GM will have to provide documentation (a trusted source, e.g. that player's team website, articles from HF/HF boards, RLR, FC, etc.) on that player's stats/skills for Krazz to create the prospect (makes it easier to assign ratings). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler23- Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Wow this is some crazy stuff happening on here.. Way too many questions to follow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F.Underwood Posted November 9, 2011 Share Posted November 9, 2011 Only thing I want to know is when will the next wave of hired Gm's will be announced Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.