Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Why is AV not trying the obvious? Henrik with Bitz


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
86 replies to this topic

#61 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,779 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:45 PM

They looked great early but Bitz ran out of gas .. by the time the playoffs happen, Bitz should be in game shape .. he adds a much needed dimension to any line he plays on .. good call AV .. the first of many you will need to pull off if we are to make the Finals again ..

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 


#62 ice orca

ice orca

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,350 posts
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:00 PM

lots of little meltdowns early on in this thread lol. bitz looked ok playing with the sedins. looks like av is just as tired as we are about the twins getting beat on, he can use bitz with them in nasty games when the reffs are blind to the crap going on.

#63 Bodee

Bodee

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,257 posts
  • Joined: 26-May 11

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:04 PM

Who cares about a regular season win against Colorado an, 11th place team.
This sh*it wouldn't cut it, even in the 1st round of the post season.
I swear to god if Bitz is on the first line tonight, i will not stop on spreading my hate for AV's retarded decisons


Man that is a sad thing to say.

Support the guys wearing the jerseys!

I am on record as not wanting Bitz anywhere near this team. However on the evidence of the last two limited time games I don't mind admitting I was wrong.

Bitz surprised me and that cut back for Daniel was Sedinesque. I even got the impression the Sedins enjoyed it :lol:

Did I imagine it or did Bitz just blast right through the defenders stick blade when he scored as if it was made of wet paper?

Edited by Bodee, 08 February 2012 - 04:13 PM.

Kevin.jpg

#64 Chivas

Chivas

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 107 posts
  • Joined: 16-March 08

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:16 PM

Too funny.
I wanted to post earlier, but the forum got shut down as quickly as the OP.

I haven't seen enough of Bitz to see if he would be a good fit with the Sedins, but the goals he was involved in were heads up plays.

His first shot, was very well timed, and he lifted his stick quickly to avoid the defender from getting his stick in the way of his swing. I don't know how many times I've seen Canuck player seeming completely oblivious to the checker coming behind them.

His back pass between his legs to setup the Sedin goal infront of the net was also a heads up play.

He won't have to be that fast to keep up with the Sedins and if he has scoring hands in front of the net, and hands capable of wash the opposing players faces trying to get at the Sedins he would be an asset.

#65 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 70,487 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:20 PM

Lol.

307mg00.jpg


#66 samurai

samurai

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,330 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 06

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:28 PM

lololololol!



Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

I had to get in on the laughing too

#67 lexluthor

lexluthor

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 441 posts
  • Joined: 05-May 11

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:29 PM

Hey OP, Doug MacLean just called and said, "Are you kidding ME?"

Edited by lexluthor, 08 February 2012 - 04:32 PM.


#68 keslerian one

keslerian one

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts
  • Joined: 27-April 11

Posted 08 February 2012 - 04:33 PM

I wonder what your reaction was when AV mixed the lines up and put Burrows with the Sedins a few years back in St. Louis.

If this works out and Bitz can play with Sedins, we have a much balanced line up. And that line gets some needed size and grit.
Remember the chumps we used to try out with the twins? They were big guys with no hands. Sedins are much much better than they were when they were playing with Anson Carter, who turned into a scorer with the Sedins. Bitz just needs to play smart and use his body and they will find him. I think AV is smart to give it a shot especially when they've looked as flat as they did in the last few games.


Sedin - Sedin - Bitz
Booth - Kesler - Higgins/Burrows
Burrows/Higgins - Lappy - Hansen
Raymond - Malhotra - Weise

#69 surtur

surtur

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,775 posts
  • Joined: 19-March 10

Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:28 PM

if bitz proves to be a great asset (need a few more games) it would be great to have him in the game against the Sharks, Bruins, Kings, Chicago's of the NHL.
happy he got his first (of many) goals early so he doen't get in a dreaded slump.

Release The KraKassian
Kassianthe_Krakensm.jpg


#70 Edler's Mind Tricks

Edler's Mind Tricks

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,890 posts
  • Joined: 05-March 10

Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:50 AM

Man that is a sad thing to say.

Support the guys wearing the jerseys!

I am on record as not wanting Bitz anywhere near this team. However on the evidence of the last two limited time games I don't mind admitting I was wrong.

Bitz surprised me and that cut back for Daniel was Sedinesque. I even got the impression the Sedins enjoyed it :lol:

Did I imagine it or did Bitz just blast right through the defenders stick blade when he scored as if it was made of wet paper?

I was JUST about to reply to this post but you beat me to it..

Keep spreading the hate buddy!

I like this a LOT. The chances of finding another Burr is slim, slim, slim but why not try? IF Bitz proves to be as good with Hank as Burrows is then we have just found our gritty winger (tiny chance before now it's just unlikely).

Sedin Sedin Bitz (Bitz will be fresh enough with the Sedins that he will still forecheck as hard as Burr used to and hit 100x harder)
Booth Kesler Higgins (such a powerful line.. Noone will be messing with them)
Burrows Hodgson Hansen (brings Burrows who is great at playing with people like Sedins [Hodgson plays a similar style] to mentor Hodgson and maybe lets Burr be more of an agitator. Burr is a natural LW)
Lapierre Malhotra Weise (4th line that has been effective all year and Pini and Volpatti could be ready for the playoffs).

That would make Raymond completely expendable to be traded straight up (or at least not involve another roster player) for a Dman.

Hockey Management Intern for UBC Thunderbirds.
Associate Editor for Dobber Sports Network.
Designing a UBC Hockey Management Degree.


#71 Provost

Provost

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,849 posts
  • Joined: 05-September 03

Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:48 AM

People might want to hold on before they pencil Bitz onto the top line permanently... even AV said "he is still far down on the list" when asked about it.

It was just something to mix up the team a little as they were getting stagnant as happens to every team over an 82 game season... AV saw that a little shakeup was needed and did it.

Detroit used to do this mid-season by doing things like putting Fedorov on defence for a few games. It keeps things fresh over a very long haul.

It is also the reason we will see some sort of move at the deadline, even if it doesn't end up being huge. Just some new blood and changing the dynamic a little.
Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic!

#72 Canuck Surfer

Canuck Surfer

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,876 posts
  • Joined: 27-December 10

Posted 09 February 2012 - 03:41 AM

Be carefull; Bitz is exactly what Torres should have been last year and Samuelsson was a few years ago against Chicago in the play offs.

A big guy to offset an opponent stcking all their big guys against the Sedins/Burrows. When teams do this (and they do, see Boston) we simply need a big guy option to open up the game for them. In the meantime Burrows would wreak havoc with Kesler. Teams make an adjustment and shifting the big guy up with the Twins served its purpose.

But Bitz is not taking over any position like this full time without displaying some serious Chutzpah and some skills.



I was JUST about to reply to this post but you beat me to it..

Keep spreading the hate buddy!

I like this a LOT. The chances of finding another Burr is slim, slim, slim but why not try? IF Bitz proves to be as good with Hank as Burrows is then we have just found our gritty winger (tiny chance before now it's just unlikely).

Sedin Sedin Bitz (Bitz will be fresh enough with the Sedins that he will still forecheck as hard as Burr used to and hit 100x harder)
Booth Kesler Higgins (such a powerful line.. Noone will be messing with them)
Burrows Hodgson Hansen (brings Burrows who is great at playing with people like Sedins [Hodgson plays a similar style] to mentor Hodgson and maybe lets Burr be more of an agitator. Burr is a natural LW)
Lapierre Malhotra Weise (4th line that has been effective all year and Pini and Volpatti could be ready for the playoffs).

That would make Raymond completely expendable to be traded straight up (or at least not involve another roster player) for a Dman.



#73 Alex_Edler_Walks_on_Water

Alex_Edler_Walks_on_Water

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 100 posts
  • Joined: 23-January 09

Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:37 AM

...Or maybe the Sedins can drop down and form a defense pairing instead since Keith Ballard apparently wants to play forward so badly.


lol.
GO CANUCKS GO!!

#74 Airjasper

Airjasper

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 488 posts
  • Joined: 27-November 08

Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:39 AM

Okay, did you guys not watch the game? What's with all this talk about Bitz with the Sedins being a new line and AV is a genius for doing so??? The new line that Bitz was on only included Henrik. The only reason that Bitz was playing with 2 Sedins for those 2 goals was because the Canucks just finished killing a penalty.

The new lines did not work at all. Bitz/Henrik/Raymond looked like absolute crap and generated essentially nothing. The 3 goals were:

1pp goal
2 goals where AV actually put the Sedins together because a penalty was just killed.

Seriously guys...

#75 Aladeen

Aladeen

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,312 posts
  • Joined: 22-September 07

Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:55 AM

To all the AV haters out there I think this article is pretty relevant, I posted this back when it first came out but perhaps it will give you guys some prespective on him as to whether or not the players think he is awful as some on here would have us believe:

Daniel Sedin on Canucks' Vigneault: "He does what he needs to do, and he leaves us alone"


By ed Willes, The ProvinceJanuary 30, 2012 3:06 PM



Alain Vigneault has been Daniel Sedin's coach for six years which, to put things in perspective, is roughly the equivalent of 34 Kardashian marriages.

In that time, Daniel has evolved from a newly minted second-liner to a point-a-game first-liner to one of the five-best forwards in the NHL. In those same six years the Canucks have evolved from a borderline playoff team, to a good but not great playoff team to a legitimate Stanley Cup contender.

So the coach and player have shared an interesting journey and given that history, given the soaring moments of triumph and the crushing moments of defeat, you'd think they would have formed a bond by now.

But, when asked how well he knows Vigneault, this is what Daniel says: “I know him better now than I did a couple of years ago. But I don't know him really well. He keeps a distance. I like that. You don't want to be friends with the coach.”
Not even a little bit?

“He doesn't really interact with the players much,” Daniel continued. “He does what he needs to do, he prepares us, and he leaves us alone. I think that's the key.”

Actually, this is the key. Heading into tonight's game with the Blackhawks, Vigneault has coached 459 game with the Canucks. His record over that time is 266-148-45 which makes him the winningest coach in Canucks history. His regular season points percentage of .628 would also place him fourth among active coaches and in the top-10 on the all-time list.

His record, in fact, stands up to any coach currently in the game and all but a handful of the all-time greats. Like the players, Canucks' fans can't say they have the closest relationship with Vigneault but they do know one thing about the man.

He wins. And in his line of work, that's all you really have to know about him.

As the Canucks begin their stretch run, they occupy what's becoming a familiar position. They lead the Northwest Division by a comfortable margin. They also occupy second place in the West, three points behind the Red Wings who lead the Presidents Trophy race.

True, it hasn't been the most exhilarating opening act to the season – before the Oilers' game last Tuesday an out-of-town reporter asked Vigneault about the low-key, almost boring way the Canucks go about their business – but that also seems to be the team's m.o. The vast majority of nights they show up. Most of those nights they're successful. They aren't always thrilling but, for the most part, they're consistent in their approach and their preparation.

And isn't that a reflection of the head coach?

There persists, in some corners of this always interesting market, the vague, unsubstantiated view that Vigneault isn't a championship coach, that he lacks that certain something that can lead this team to a Stanley Cup. That's valid in so far as Vigneault, along with 23 other coaches currently employed in the NHL, has never won a Stanley Cup

But think of the other things you judge a coach by. Then think of Vigneault's work here.

Is the team consistent? Does he get the most out of his players? Have those players improved under his watch? Have the young players gotten better? Have players who've left the Canucks suddenly become more productive?

The answer, in virtually every case, is self-evident.

It's also been interesting to watch Vigneault change as the team has matured. He's admitted as much, suggesting he does as much monitoring now as coaching. He says the players know his likes and dislikes. He says players need “autonomy” to grow.

Over his six years here the team and the coach have built a relationship that doesn't need a lot of dialogue. Both parties seem to like it that way.

“We know what to expect from him and he knows what to expect from us,” Daniel said. “When you start doing your own thing and you're not following the team concept, you hear about it As long as we do what needs to be done, he's going to leave us alone.”

That's not as easy as it sounds in a market where emotions run high and the fans' temperament is determined by the performance on any given night.

But six years after he was hired, Vigneault is still here, still winning. That's the only relevant yardstick for measuring his work.
© Copyright © The Province
Posted Image

#76 kchengc

kchengc

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,301 posts
  • Joined: 03-November 03

Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:06 PM

another assist... ;)

#77 nuck luck

nuck luck

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 11

Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:51 PM

I was JUST about to reply to this post but you beat me to it..

Keep spreading the hate buddy!

I like this a LOT. The chances of finding another Burr is slim, slim, slim but why not try? IF Bitz proves to be as good with Hank as Burrows is then we have just found our gritty winger (tiny chance before now it's just unlikely).

Sedin Sedin Bitz (Bitz will be fresh enough with the Sedins that he will still forecheck as hard as Burr used to and hit 100x harder)
Booth Kesler Higgins (such a powerful line.. Noone will be messing with them)
Burrows Hodgson Hansen (brings Burrows who is great at playing with people like Sedins [Hodgson plays a similar style] to mentor Hodgson and maybe lets Burr be more of an agitator. Burr is a natural LW)
Lapierre Malhotra Weise (4th line that has been effective all year and Pini and Volpatti could be ready for the playoffs).

That would make Raymond completely expendable to be traded straight up (or at least not involve another roster player) for a Dman.


I prefer Burr on the 2nd and Higgy on the 3rd... We all know that Kes and Burr work well... we've also seen some brilliance with the triple H line.

This does live Mayray out there... I don't think he could play on the 4th (he could play...but) and I'd rather add more size.

But, let's take pause and look at these lines...one small adjustment for the 4th (size/weight/skill) that could be acquired for very little, maybe a pick. Our forwards are pretty fu@king good... :)

D.Sedin, H.Sedin, Bitz
Booth, Kes, Burr
Higgy, Coho, Hansen
Lappy, Manny, Weise/Mayray or (deadline pickup)

Come playoffs... we've got some solid depth at forward; Reinprect, Schroeder, Duco, Mancari, Sweatt....I'm probably missing some, but I like the forwards and the depth. No need to waste anything for another top player.... maybe a 4th liner.

#78 nuck luck

nuck luck

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 11

Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:00 PM

Okay, did you guys not watch the game? What's with all this talk about Bitz with the Sedins being a new line and AV is a genius for doing so??? The new line that Bitz was on only included Henrik. The only reason that Bitz was playing with 2 Sedins for those 2 goals was because the Canucks just finished killing a penalty.

The new lines did not work at all. Bitz/Henrik/Raymond looked like absolute crap and generated essentially nothing. The 3 goals were:

1pp goal
2 goals where AV actually put the Sedins together because a penalty was just killed.

Seriously guys...


Your first paragraph makes no sense. So one line only consists of Bitz and Henrik? And who gives a flying fu@k about the 'reason' Bitz and the Sedins were together...the point is that they played well!

I'm going to sum up your post in simple english, the Sedins and Bitz were placed together because we just killed a penalty, they ONLY scored 2 goals playing 5 on 5 within minutes. Ok.

Nobody is talking about putting Bitz, Henrik and Mayray together again.... what are you talking about??? The Sedins and Bitz looked fantastic the other day and they did pretty good tonight too.

that's a lot of hot airjasper...

Edited by nuck luck, 09 February 2012 - 10:18 PM.


#79 nuck luck

nuck luck

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 553 posts
  • Joined: 09-September 11

Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:09 PM

People might want to hold on before they pencil Bitz onto the top line permanently... even AV said "he is still far down on the list" when asked about it.

It was just something to mix up the team a little as they were getting stagnant as happens to every team over an 82 game season... AV saw that a little shakeup was needed and did it.

Detroit used to do this mid-season by doing things like putting Fedorov on defence for a few games. It keeps things fresh over a very long haul.

It is also the reason we will see some sort of move at the deadline, even if it doesn't end up being huge. Just some new blood and changing the dynamic a little.


It's all in fun. I agree that it's a little early to assume that Bitz is going to keep this pace up... but I like what I see so far and I like the confidence the Sedins show with a big banging player on their wing.

I read that article you quoted from, I think you used the quote out of context... wasn't AV asked about the Shootout and where Bitz was in the line (for the shootout) if Edler didn't get the game winner? and AV replied, "...he is still far down on the list."

#80 {nhl}

{nhl}

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,244 posts
  • Joined: 27-July 06

Posted 10 February 2012 - 12:28 AM

Where's the OP?

Cats got your tongue?
NOBODY BEATS WILLIE

"Give Willie Mitchell a tough assignment and he’ll
treat it like life and death." - Alain Vigneault

#81 BigRedMachine

BigRedMachine

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 961 posts
  • Joined: 14-April 06

Posted 10 February 2012 - 10:49 AM

Well this is refreshing. Usually the second-guessing happens after the game....


+1

#82 Gino Gino Gino

Gino Gino Gino

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • Joined: 28-January 12

Posted 10 February 2012 - 11:54 AM

Hahahahahahaha!!! AV made all you haters look stupid. . . again. Why not just trust the coach that spends every day with the players to utilize what he see's working in practice?

Now Bitz has 3 points in the two games since his promotion, and we are seeing threads about him being the next Bertuzzi (which of course is the knee jerking in the other direction now).

In AV and MG we MUST TRUST, they call the shots and if you haven't noticed, they have done a pretty good job so far.

#83 ynot-llat

ynot-llat

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts
  • Joined: 22-May 08

Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:16 AM

BUMP
Finally in the 3rd period he goes BOOTH HODGSON KESLER
which btw were dangerous every time they stepped on the ice.

not to mention the BITZ fumble, but we dont need to go there. Everybody makes mistakes and quite frankly i like his speed and strength on the puck.

#84 DownUndaCanuck

DownUndaCanuck

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,223 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 07

Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:58 AM

Bitz is the best fit on the team for the Sedins right now and if its not obvious enough I'll try and explain why. Firstly, the Sedins scored 3 goals in a game and 1 shift with Bitz on their line, then AV goes right back to Burrows and the Sedins are shutout 2 games in a row.

Firstly, Bitz is a bigger body than Burrows and he's keeping his game simple. Bitz, unlike Burrows, is also heeding the coach's advice and is taking the puck hard to the net. He's the only one on this team right now apart from Booth who's driving the net hard and creating a net presence which is how Burrows initially had plenty of success with the Sedins, and how Hansen did in his stint with them as well. Right now Burrows is getting too involved with the Sedins cycle and it results in a vacant crease so the goalie doesn't have to worry about point-shots at all, and we never have a forward in the slot for a shot because thanks to Burrows they're all retreiving the puck along the wall.

Secondly, Bitz plays a much shorter cycle than Burrows, which benefits the Sedins style of play. Lately they're having their cycle disrupted when they try long passes along the boards, say from the half boards to behind the net, because there's more room for a defenceman to squeeze in and steal the puck. However Bitz has kept the puck very close to the net on all of his cycles - within the trapezoid. This benefits the Sedins because they're masters at the small touch passes to each other which is better done in close proximity. Also, it lets one of them or Bitz peel off to the front of the net as we saw on Daniel's goal with Bitz a while back. This would never happen with Burrows because the Sedins are too busy skating to open areas and moving around too much. Simply, Bitz isn't as good a skater as Burrows, but either are the Sedins - they work best standing still and passing short, then jumping into open space abruptly as opposed to constantly skating around in large circles which is easier to defend.

Thirdly, Bitz is far more physical than Burrows along the boards. The best way to disrupt the Sedins' cycle is to play them physically as we've seen on countless occasions, but if Bitz joins the cycle the defence is in trouble because I haven't seen anyone able to knock Bitz off the puck when he's cycling down low yet. Burrows is about as small as the Sedins so he's easily squeezed off the puck along the boards, but with Bitz not only is it harder to knock him off the puck, but one tough defenceman has to try and contain him, leaving a Sedin with a forward who isn't as physical - again a perfect example on the Daniel goal from Bitz (backhand pass).

Fourthly, Bitz is the biggest, scariest guy on our team and come playoff time, everyone will want to grab the Sedins in a headlock after a whistle. When Burrows is on their line he actually aggravates the other team more and makes them angrier, which essentially leads to a 5-on-3 in the offensive zone (our defencemen don't join the scrum or the faceoff exits the zone) and one of the Sedins are eventually grabbed. However, with Bitz we have a guy who will scare other teams from touching the Sedins. Burrows isn't scaring anyone, but no one wants to be grabbed or hit by Byron Bitz.

And for any of you who tell me "Bitz has no hands" or is just a 4th line checker, in the limited time he played with the Sedins he demonstrated skills far superior to most of our other forwards. This guy gets 1 game and 1 shift with the Sedins and dishes up 2 of the prettiest passes by a Canuck this season as well as an absolute rocket of a shot. This guy is seriously skilled and deserves to play with the twins.

Now I don't hate Burrows by any means, but his game has changed a lot since he started playing with the Sedins. Originally he kept it simple, went straight to the net and scored goals right in close but now that he understands the Sedin's cycle he tries and join it, leaving us with no net presence which is what the Sedins thrive on. Burrows has also become a better skater and stick-handler, so IMO his new style of play is far better suited to fast skaters and north-south players like Kesler, Booth, Higgins, Lapierre and Hodgson.

Here's what I would wish to see when Higgins returns, that is if AV sees what I see:

Sedin - Sedin - Bitz (reasons listed above)
Higgins - Kesler - Booth (already have great chemistry)
Burrows - Hodgson - Lapierre (Burrows and Lapierre showed nice chemistry when they were together)
Raymond - Malhotra - Hansen (these guys have all played together for long periods of time)
Posted Image

#85 bd71

bd71

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 709 posts
  • Joined: 07-July 11

Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:57 AM

Bitz is the best fit on the team for the Sedins right now and if its not obvious enough I'll try and explain why. Firstly, the Sedins scored 3 goals in a game and 1 shift with Bitz on their line, then AV goes right back to Burrows and the Sedins are shutout 2 games in a row. Firstly, Bitz is a bigger body than Burrows and he's keeping his game simple. Bitz, unlike Burrows, is also heeding the coach's advice and is taking the puck hard to the net. He's the only one on this team right now apart from Booth who's driving the net hard and creating a net presence which is how Burrows initially had plenty of success with the Sedins, and how Hansen did in his stint with them as well. Right now Burrows is getting too involved with the Sedins cycle and it results in a vacant crease so the goalie doesn't have to worry about point-shots at all, and we never have a forward in the slot for a shot because thanks to Burrows they're all retreiving the puck along the wall. Secondly, Bitz plays a much shorter cycle than Burrows, which benefits the Sedins style of play. Lately they're having their cycle disrupted when they try long passes along the boards, say from the half boards to behind the net, because there's more room for a defenceman to squeeze in and steal the puck. However Bitz has kept the puck very close to the net on all of his cycles - within the trapezoid. This benefits the Sedins because they're masters at the small touch passes to each other which is better done in close proximity. Also, it lets one of them or Bitz peel off to the front of the net as we saw on Daniel's goal with Bitz a while back. This would never happen with Burrows because the Sedins are too busy skating to open areas and moving around too much. Simply, Bitz isn't as good a skater as Burrows, but either are the Sedins - they work best standing still and passing short, then jumping into open space abruptly as opposed to constantly skating around in large circles which is easier to defend. Thirdly, Bitz is far more physical than Burrows along the boards. The best way to disrupt the Sedins' cycle is to play them physically as we've seen on countless occasions, but if Bitz joins the cycle the defence is in trouble because I haven't seen anyone able to knock Bitz off the puck when he's cycling down low yet. Burrows is about as small as the Sedins so he's easily squeezed off the puck along the boards, but with Bitz not only is it harder to knock him off the puck, but one tough defenceman has to try and contain him, leaving a Sedin with a forward who isn't as physical - again a perfect example on the Daniel goal from Bitz (backhand pass). Fourthly, Bitz is the biggest, scariest guy on our team and come playoff time, everyone will want to grab the Sedins in a headlock after a whistle. When Burrows is on their line he actually aggravates the other team more and makes them angrier, which essentially leads to a 5-on-3 in the offensive zone (our defencemen don't join the scrum or the faceoff exits the zone) and one of the Sedins are eventually grabbed. However, with Bitz we have a guy who will scare other teams from touching the Sedins. Burrows isn't scaring anyone, but no one wants to be grabbed or hit by Byron Bitz. And for any of you who tell me "Bitz has no hands" or is just a 4th line checker, in the limited time he played with the Sedins he demonstrated skills far superior to most of our other forwards. This guy gets 1 game and 1 shift with the Sedins and dishes up 2 of the prettiest passes by a Canuck this season as well as an absolute rocket of a shot. This guy is seriously skilled and deserves to play with the twins. Now I don't hate Burrows by any means, but his game has changed a lot since he started playing with the Sedins. Originally he kept it simple, went straight to the net and scored goals right in close but now that he understands the Sedin's cycle he tries and join it, leaving us with no net presence which is what the Sedins thrive on. Burrows has also become a better skater and stick-handler, so IMO his new style of play is far better suited to fast skaters and north-south players like Kesler, Booth, Higgins, Lapierre and Hodgson. Here's what I would wish to see when Higgins returns, that is if AV sees what I see: Sedin - Sedin - Bitz (reasons listed above) Higgins - Kesler - Booth (already have great chemistry) Burrows - Hodgson - Lapierre (Burrows and Lapierre showed nice chemistry when they were together) Raymond - Malhotra - Hansen (these guys have all played together for long periods of time)


Are you the agent that represents Byron Bitz???

This is like a presentation to get a player a contract increase.

#86 ZeusBro

ZeusBro

    K-Wing Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts
  • Joined: 01-January 12

Posted 14 February 2012 - 05:36 AM

Coho played amazing tonight probably why he was promoted to 2nd.

#87 DaMacNamedDre

DaMacNamedDre

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,032 posts
  • Joined: 13-October 11

Posted 15 March 2012 - 12:52 AM

Bitz in Raymond out.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Posted ImageBodee, on 18 April 2012 - 11:07 AM, said:

I haven't been a supporter of the Canucks for long. Mainly because firstly I know nothing about NHL and secondly ESPN America only started showing NHL 3 years ago.

http://forum.canucks.com/topic/328055-whats-wrong-with-me
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.