TheCammer Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Error-hoff, the minus machine? Really? The only checking he does is at the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Wow...you do realise both players were on the same when we went to the finals right? I don't think I've seen a dumber post than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlyCanucks Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 you gotta be kidding me? Starting this thread was a big mistake!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckRow Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Stanley cup final appearances: Bieksa -1 Ehrhoff - 0 End of discussion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Ehrhoff wanted too much cake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkstar Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Error-hoff, the minus machine? Really? The only checking he does is at the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bur14Kes17 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Errorhoff? Vancouver made erhoff... not the other way around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kass Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Theres no doubt hes not as Offensive as Ehrhoff but Ehrhoff couldnt play Better than he has in Situations he has been playing in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Luongo Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Bieksa wasn't a mistake and he will be great again come playoff time. The bigger mistake will be if we sign Edler to big money and long term. We need to get rid of Edler and Schneider(if we have to and not Luongo) and get Shea Webber if it takes a 3 team deal. This team needs solid tough defense and Edler is definitely not that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skadoosh Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Know what we should have done? We should have signed all of the defencemen in the league so nobody else had any then trade them Alberts for Giroux and and and and.. uh.. OK. OP is out of his mind, the stupid it burns, etc. Bring back the minus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Bieksa wasn't a mistake and he will be great again come playoff time. The bigger mistake will be if we sign Edler to big money and long term. <---- AGREE We need to get rid of Edler and Schneider(if we have to and not Luongo) and get Shea Webber if it takes a 3 team deal. This team needs solid tough defense and Edler is definitely not that. <---- COMPLETELY DISAGREE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bd71 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I am afraid that we might over value Edler, but he's a pretty tough defenseman. Maybe not a shutdown guy like you might want, which is why he shouldn't be overvalued.. but I think he's going to be effective in the playoffs. For a young, top-4 defenseman like Edler, if we sign him at 3.25 again I'd be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAILED-BY-THE-HAMMER Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 hostile thread. Bieska was the better signing for many reasons he wants to be here has chemistry with hamhuis team leader decent cap. whats with the edler bashing he is on pace for 50+points i hope he signs for a deal 4yrs between 3-4m a year then that would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rb4u Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Cap issue is not as easy as it sounds. Ballard's contract at 4.2 million wouldn't be enough to keep Erhoff . The Canucks offered him 5 million and Christian turned them down . Yes you could have waived Ballard to the minors and someone could have picked him up for nothing but we still be on the hook for Ballard's contract or at least half of it and it would still go against the cap. One more thing it doesn't matter how much the Canucks have made in last years playoff it has nothing to do with the Salary cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Ehrhoff kinda sucked in the playoffs last year, he only got 4 even strength points and he was terrible defensively. So yeah Bieksa showed up, Ehrhoff did not Bieksa 1 Ehrhoff 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttock Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 After last year's playoffs you would have had to be crazy to sign Ehrhoff over Bieksa, but for the record, the plan was always to sign them both if they were willing to accept reasonable deals. They offered Ehrhoff the same deal they offered Bieksa, and he said no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
î мцšт вяздк чфµ Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 wish i could minus the OP for this. Juice > Hoff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Luongo Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 hostile thread. Bieska was the better signing for many reasons he wants to be here has chemistry with hamhuis team leader decent cap. whats with the edler bashing he is on pace for 50+points i hope he signs for a deal 4yrs between 3-4m a year then that would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dangler696969 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Ehrhoff was a valuable player as a play maker. Bieksa was a fringe 7th defenseman right before the 2010-2011 season. He got a couple of good bounces, a lucky break with Ballard being down early in the season, and he got his mega deal. Bieksa is not a bad player, but certainly not worth the almost $4mil per season if he's not playing on the edge and dropping the gloves. His size is a liability. Ehrhoff had a certain intelligence about him. He would find the right shooting lane, or make sure that the puck was tippable. The pucks that bounced off the goalie would also be easy to tap into a wide open net. Just look at how few tap-in, or tip-in goals this year by the Canucks and you will know what we are dealing with here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Second of all, how much money they made in the playoffs (from us ticket holders) have everything to do with the ability to pay Erhorff the $50 million he wanted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.