keslerian one Posted June 6, 2012 Share Posted June 6, 2012 I did not see Gilroy play when he was in college, but watching Schultz... it looks like this guy is actually a legit player who CAN crack the lineup of an NHL team. Just sayin' Do I think he will play good 10 minutes a game playing the third pair on the Canucks? Absolutely. He just needs to be better than Rome or Alberts, and he'll make the roster. If he can't even do that, then I don't understand what this fuss is about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttock Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 I did not see Gilroy play when he was in college, but watching Schultz... it looks like this guy is actually a legit player who CAN crack the lineup of an NHL team. Just sayin' Do I think he will play good 10 minutes a game playing the third pair on the Canucks? Absolutely. He just needs to be better than Rome or Alberts, and he'll make the roster. If he can't even do that, then I don't understand what this fuss is about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Millerdraft Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 I thought you were one of the more knowledgeable posters here, except for when I disagreed with you when you posted Milan Lucic could be part of the BOS package for Rick Nash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 I did not see Gilroy play when he was in college, but watching Schultz... it looks like this guy is actually a legit player who CAN crack the lineup of an NHL team. Just sayin' Do I think he will play good 10 minutes a game playing the third pair on the Canucks? Absolutely. He just needs to be better than Rome or Alberts, and he'll make the roster. If he can't even do that, then I don't understand what this fuss is about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorrcoq Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 "3 - if he makes this team, he will rack up the points" What guarantee is there of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted June 7, 2012 Share Posted June 7, 2012 Bobby Mac doing a little Q & A via twitter today: Q: @MacNasty2point1 @TSNBobMcKenzie who do you think the canucks will go after in free agency? If anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttock Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Note the "they will" vs. "IMO they will". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerrsil Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 you know, with the rumors of Luongo potentially going to TO for Gardiner, maybe hinges on the Schulz factor? dunno... could you imagine though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 you know, with the rumors of Luongo potentially going to TO for Gardiner, maybe hinges on the Schulz factor? dunno... could you imagine though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There's no way the Burke gives up Gardiner for Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RunningWild Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Good grief, talk about reading too much into things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buttock Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Too bad it doesn't really tell us much because we already knew, or should have known, or been 99% sure, that the Canucks would make a strong play for Justin Schultz, considering he is from BC, and all 30 teams are reportedly interested in his services. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There's no way Gillis will give up an all star goalie for Gardiner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There are not many teams that are eager to take on Luongo's baggage. Any team that might take on Luongo will want the Canucks to take something bad back. Then that team might throw in a decent prospect or pick. You'll counter with then Gillis will just keep Luongo. That is far from the Canuck's best interest. Luongo has already been shown that he is not a goalie that Vingeault will go to. Even if the Canuck's trade Schnieder, Luongo will want a fresh start. Keeping Luongo will create a huge problem around the team and make things a lot worse than trading Luongo and either getting a bad contract or nothing back. Gillis has two options. He can trade Luongo for whatever he can get which won't be that much or he can demote Luongo to the minors. A team might pick him up off waivers then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samurai Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There are not many teams that are eager to take on Luongo's baggage. Any team that might take on Luongo will want the Canucks to take something bad back. Then that team might throw in a decent prospect or pick. You'll counter with then Gillis will just keep Luongo. That is far from the Canuck's best interest. Luongo has already been shown that he is not a goalie that Vingeault will go to. Even if the Canuck's trade Schnieder, Luongo will want a fresh start. Keeping Luongo will create a huge problem around the team and make things a lot worse than trading Luongo and either getting a bad contract or nothing back. Gillis has two options. He can trade Luongo for whatever he can get which won't be that much or he can demote Luongo to the minors. A team might pick him up off waivers then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There are not many teams that are eager to take on Luongo's baggage. Any team that might take on Luongo will want the Canucks to take something bad back. Then that team might throw in a decent prospect or pick. You'll counter with then Gillis will just keep Luongo. That is far from the Canuck's best interest. Luongo has already been shown that he is not a goalie that Vingeault will go to. Even if the Canuck's trade Schnieder, Luongo will want a fresh start. Keeping Luongo will create a huge problem around the team and make things a lot worse than trading Luongo and either getting a bad contract or nothing back. Gillis has two options. He can trade Luongo for whatever he can get which won't be that much or he can demote Luongo to the minors. A team might pick him up off waivers then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There are not many teams that are eager to take on Luongo's baggage. Any team that might take on Luongo will want the Canucks to take something bad back. Then that team might throw in a decent prospect or pick. You'll counter with then Gillis will just keep Luongo. That is far from the Canuck's best interest. Luongo has already been shown that he is not a goalie that Vingeault will go to. Even if the Canuck's trade Schnieder, Luongo will want a fresh start. Keeping Luongo will create a huge problem around the team and make things a lot worse than trading Luongo and either getting a bad contract or nothing back. Gillis has two options. He can trade Luongo for whatever he can get which won't be that much or he can demote Luongo to the minors. A team might pick him up off waivers then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 From Lou's perspective I suspect that he wants to move on. Even if Schneider was traded he would still be faced with the questions about his 'perceived' playoff meltdowns. If Schneider was traded and went on to a great career then Lou would feel the fallout for that as well. As above I expect a great return for Lou. Hopefully a deal that put's Van over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 There are not many teams that are eager to take on Luongo's baggage. Any team that might take on Luongo will want the Canucks to take something bad back. Then that team might throw in a decent prospect or pick. You'll counter with then Gillis will just keep Luongo. That is far from the Canuck's best interest. Luongo has already been shown that he is not a goalie that Vingeault will go to. Even if the Canuck's trade Schnieder, Luongo will want a fresh start. Keeping Luongo will create a huge problem around the team and make things a lot worse than trading Luongo and either getting a bad contract or nothing back. Gillis has two options. He can trade Luongo for whatever he can get which won't be that much or he can demote Luongo to the minors. A team might pick him up off waivers then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ConnorFutureGM Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 That's why Florida wants him too. Personally. Gardiner, 5th to Edm for 1st Luongo Higgins Schroeder for 1st overall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.