Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ChuckNORRIS4Cup

Canucks Slump Without Ballard, Is Ballard The Key?

24 posts in this topic

All I will say is i thought he played very well after a slow start to the season, it was very unfortunate he got injured because i felt he was finally playing good before he got injured. He was fighting, he was defending, he was moving the puck well.

Any idea or time frame for his return?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, most people don't notice but Ballard does the little things pretty well. Blocking shots, keeping an active stick, and winning puck battles. Sometimes he can just get carried away by trying to do too much with the puck. It's gonna be very nice to have him back alongside Tanev, they played really well together.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so what if ballard came back and they were still slumping...whats our excuse then...were running out of people to pin it down on.

its not anyone person, our whole team is in a minor funk.

they can be brilliant at times and we are so pumped about them, and then they lose and we look for answers like it was this guy or that guy...or we call up this guy or scratch that guy.

I dont think we are hitting near enough, when our big guys are throwing big checks we can own the opposition....and YES Ballard will be welcomed back when he is out there throwing his big checks too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bally was sure playing well before he got injured, but the team's lack of success cannot be completely attributed to his absence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or maybe not having Tambellini with us anymore if finally starting to catch up...? =P

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does this mean we like Ballard again now??? Help me, I am so confused now, why you make this thread!!!!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's presence on this defence is actually very underrated. Not only has he proven to us that it is key to have a veteran on our 3rd pairing, but we often forget that he is such a veteran and has played in many NHL games before, so this may be similar to the Salo-effect.

When Salo is out of the lineup, the entire defence crumbles including younger guys like Edler and Bieksa in particular. Now Salo may be fine, but we're missing a key part of our defence in Ballard who is as much a veteran as Salo is in terms of NHL experience, and it is likely that having 2 full-time AHLers like Gragnani and Tanev on our bottom pairing is leaving guys like Bieksa and Edler with more responsibility in terms of positioning and communication which they simply aren't used to.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive said the same for a long time. An in form Ballard, playing on his natural side is imperative for our SC chances. I also saw him and Tanev as a key to our defensive depth.

Both are cool smooth and not easily rattled.........but Ballard also has a "nasty" side to him and you need that playing with a gifted rookie.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's something I've said before, the Canucks system is based around clogging up the neutral zone and the blueline to force the opposing team to dump the puck in. The defenceman then retrieve the puck and the Canucks attack with speed through the neutral zone whether that is by having the centreman circle around the net, the defenceman lugging it up, quick short passes, or a stretch pass.

Keith Ballard is our best defenceman at lugging the puck, although he coughs it up on occasion, and has great vision when it comes to the pass.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Record since Ballard has been out!

GP = 17

W   = 9

L    = 8

46 goals scored and 44 goals allowed!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard really is a good defencemen. He just get a bad rap becaues of the contract, but theres no doubt he helps our defense. Can move the puck, plays physical. Exactly what we need in our 5 and 6 defensemen. We are missing him believe it or not.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard would definitely be better option than Gragnani right now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a GF/GA average of 2.71/2.59. Our average for the year is 3.03/2.43.

Our goals for are down far more than our goals against are up. So the issue is more about offense than defense. And I'm pretty sure missing Keith Ballard, with his 14 points in 122 games as a Canuck, isn't the reason for that.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard's presence on this defence is actually very underrated. Not only has he proven to us that it is key to have a veteran on our 3rd pairing, but we often forget that he is such a veteran and has played in many NHL games before, so this may be similar to the Salo-effect.

When Salo is out of the lineup, the entire defence crumbles including younger guys like Edler and Bieksa in particular. Now Salo may be fine, but we're missing a key part of our defence in Ballard who is as much a veteran as Salo is in terms of NHL experience, and it is likely that having 2 full-time AHLers like Gragnani and Tanev on our bottom pairing is leaving guys like Bieksa and Edler with more responsibility in terms of positioning and communication which they simply aren't used to.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.